卡玛拉对加密货币的打击?”她的顾问选择表明……”

币界网Published on 2024-08-14Last updated on 2024-08-14

币界网报道:
    Galaxy Digital的高管声称,哈里斯可能会延长对加密货币的打击。然而,彭博社的一位分析师认为,她可能对市场持中性或积极态度。

尽管Kamala Harris有加密重置计划,但一些业内人士越来越怀疑她在该行业的影响,特别是如果她赢得美国大选的话。

Galaxy Digital的研究主管Alex Thorn是最新一位对哈里斯发出警告的人。Thorn认为,哈里斯在聘请反加密货币作为她的经济顾问后,将扩大对加密货币的打击。

“她的顾问选择表明,她将保持拜登对加密货币的敌对态度。哈里斯正在与拜登政府的两名主要反加密官员Brian Deese和Bharat Ramamurti合作。”

对哈里斯反加密雇佣的看法不一

Thorn补充说,这两名官员也支持Choke Point 2.0。

“Deese和Ramamurti是拜登政府反加密运动的两位关键建筑师,包括chokepoint 2.0。”

从长远来看,Choke Point 2.0指的是美国监管机构对加密货币公司进入银行系统的限制。加密货币友好型客户银行是Choke Point 2.0的最新受害者。

据Thorn称,据称这些官员还影响并扼杀了稳定币立法。

就他而言,Bankless的Ryan Adams呼应了Thorn的观点,并称Harris的举动是,

“非常令人失望,但也是一个明确的信息。”

彭博交易所交易基金分析师詹姆斯·塞法特对哈里斯所谓的加密重置持讽刺态度,但也有一些保留意见。他说,

“与现任拜登政府相比,哈里斯政府将保持中立,可能对未来的空间持略微积极的态度。”

然而,另一位市场评论员Adam Cochran为哈里斯辩护,并声称最近的选择并不一定表明她对未来政策的不信任。

他补充说,她的顾问一直在与该行业接触。

“与此同时,她的顾问们正在与加密货币举行圆桌会议,与游说团体接触,并取得真正的进展。如果你想改变政策,就参与进来。”

Ro Khanna领导了上述大多数民主党发起的加密货币圆桌会议,并承诺支持两党对加密货币的态度。

然而,与唐纳德·特朗普不同,哈里斯没有澄清她的加密货币立场。

与此同时,哈里斯在预测网站Polymarket上赢得美国大选的几率比特朗普更高。哈里斯的获胜几率为53%,而特朗普为46%。

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit6h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit6h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片