哈里斯支持率反超特朗普 8%,币圈恐迎新一波监管压力

深潮Published on 2024-08-14Last updated on 2024-08-14

哈里斯选择了 Brian Deese 和 Bharat Ramamurti 加入自己的顾问团队,这两人对加密货币均不友好。若她最终胜选,可能将让币圈人士失望。

撰文:Zhang joy,动区动趋 BlockTempo

根据 Polymarket 最新数据显示,美国副总统哈里斯在 2024 总统选举中的支持率已经反超了前总统川普,她的支持率从早期的 33% 飙升至撰稿当下的 53% 历史新高。

另一个下注金额金额较小的赌盘,市场预测哈里斯最终将成功胜选的机率更是已经达到 77%,而川普则下降至 22%,原本被川普压著打的民主党似乎有反超的迹象。

分析师:哈里斯将延续拜登政府加密监管威压

这次即将在 11 月举行的美国大选备受币圈人士关注,原因在于这是加密货币首次成为大选重要议题被拿出来讨论。共和党总统候选人、美国前总统川普已多次公开力挺加密货币,有望一改拜登政府立场,为加密货币带来有利的监管政策。

但民主党新晋候选人哈里斯的加密立场如何呢?

对此,Galaxy Research 研究主管 Alex Thorn 昨(13)日稍晚就在社交平台 X 上发文分析指出,有证据表明,哈里斯及其顾问团队,将延续拜登政府对待加密货币的态度:

「新证据表明,哈里斯将继续打压加密货币,她的顾问选择表明,她将延续拜登对加密货币的敌视态度,因为哈里斯正在与拜登政府中,两名反对加密货币的关键官员进行合作,他们是 Brian Deese 和 Bharat Ramamurti。」

为了印证自己的分析,Alex Thorn 详细补充了 Brian Deese 和 Bharat Ramamurti 反对加密货币的关键证据。他指出,Brian Deese 早在 2023 年 1 月就曾撰写过一篇文章,该文章美其名支持创新,实际上给加密货币扣上了「诈欺」和「危险」的帽子。

至于 Bharat Ramamurti,他和美国民主党议员 Elizabeth Warren 这一加密大反派也早就一起共事,并为 Warren 提供了经济政策建议。

同时,《Fortune》杂志还蹭将 Bharat Ramamurti 评为「白宫里的头号加密货币批评家」。

另一方面,Brian Deese 和 Bharat Ramamurti 二人还对美国的稳定币法案进行干预,主张让美国联准会和银行对稳定币进行全面监管…。

总而言之,一系列证据都表明,Brian Deese 和 Bharat Ramamurti 对加密货币均不友好,而哈里斯选择他们加入自己的顾问团队,或许预示著若她最终胜选,可能将让币圈人士失望了。

Related Reads

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手1h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手1h ago

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

The article discusses how companies in the AI era are competing for talent through strategic "title arbitrage," or the renaming of key roles to reflect and attract new, high-value capabilities. It uses Palantir's creation of the "Forward-Deployed Engineer" (FDE) as a prime example. This title reframed client-facing technical work from a peripheral "implementation" role into a core, high-status engineering function. The move was strategic, allowing Palantir to attract talent that blended technical skill with business acumen and to dominate the market's perception of this capability. The piece argues that job titles are an organizational language that signals the value and authority of certain work. Effective new titles, like "Data Scientist" or "Site Reliability Engineer," emerge when a role's strategic importance genuinely outgrows its old name. Conversely, mere title inflation without substantive change is ineffective. For AI companies, particularly in B2B, this is a crucial strategy. AI transformation creates new high-leverage roles (e.g., "Legal Engineer," "GTM Engineer") that combine domain expertise with technical automation. By naming these roles, a company can help clients internally legitimize these change-makers. This, in turn, builds market mindshare, associating the company with the new capability. In conclusion, as AI blurs the lines between product and service, the ability to accurately name and organize the critical, client-adjacent work that defines product learning will be a key competitive advantage. The first to define this new organizational language plants a flag in the market's mind.

marsbit2h ago

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片