告别高估值泡沫:探索更可持续的代币发行模式

币界网Published on 2024-08-12Last updated on 2024-08-12

币界网报道:

作者:Ethan Luc 来源:coindesk 翻译:善欧巴,

阻碍主流区块链采用的主要因素仍然是普遍的看法,即该领域仍然过于注重投机。为了建立可持续的生态系统并吸引更多用户,协议必须从根本上重新考虑代币的分配方式。重点必须从虚高的估值和投机性价格行为转向长期效用和透明度。

今年,加密货币市场见证了代币发行的复苏,其中许多都采用了“低流通量、高完全稀释价值 (FDV)”策略。该计划很简单:以高价发行,以数十亿美元的估值领先,并围绕项目的潜力进行炒作。这种策略受到了广泛的批评,但对于许多追逐关注的项目来说,它已被证明是不可抗拒的。问题是什么?它完全是人为的。

“低浮动量、高 FDV”模式涉及将总代币供应量(浮动量)的一小部分释放到市场,同时为每个代币分配高价。这为项目创造了一个具有欺骗性的 FDV,许多代币持有者未能说明仍有待流通的剩余代币供应量。

虽然这种方法可以产生巨大的初始兴趣,但采用这种模式的许多项目看到的只是短期利益,而长期利益会逐渐瓦解。这不是一种可持续的方法,会分散所有加密项目的注意力,而这应该是真正的重点——长期实用性和协议采用。比特币花了数年时间才建立起用户群——而如今,项目只需一次大规模发布就能做到这一点。

加密货币必须做出更大胆的赌注,重新将行业重点放在分销和效用上,同时避免价格投机。

有一种更好的方法来管理代币发行——一种优先考虑长期效用和有机增长而不是投机收益的方法。协议开始尝试替代模型。例如,基于区块链的社交平台 FRIEND 以 100% 的浮动发行,从第一天起就将所有代币分发给社区。在 Lava Network 采取了截然不同的方法后,我相信行业必须采用区块链项目应如何处理代币分配和估值的新标准。

市场导向方法

通过分享区块链访问层 Lava 的经验和见解,我希望我们能够激发人们转向更负责任和可持续的代币发行实践。共同打造一个更强大、更具弹性、让所有参与者受益的区块链生态系统。

这种替代代币发行策略以通过去中心化交易所 (DEX) 交易实现的市场衍生 FDV 为中心,旨在减少投机行为并有机地培养信徒和长期网络参与者社区。通过确保更高的初始流通量和上限供应量,这种方法将重点更多地放在代币的内在效用和项目的实际潜力上,而不是投机定价。

这一策略有几个主要好处:

  1. 减少投机:有了更高的初始流通量,市场可以根据代币的效用和需求(而不是投机性炒作)更准确地为其定价。

  2. 有机增长:市场衍生的 FDV 培育出一个专注于项目长期成功和效用的社区。

  3. 透明度和信任:通过避免估值过高的陷阱,这种方法可以与社区和利益相关者建立更大的信任,确保未来的道路更加稳定和可预测。

尽管有些人可能认为市场衍生的 FDV 方法可能会导致初始增长放缓或低估的风险,但稳定、可持续的协议的长期利益远远超过这些短期担忧。

区块链领域最近的评论也强调了变革的必要性。例如,Azeem Khan 在 CoinDesk 上发表的一篇文章正确地主张,应放弃虚高的估值,以吸引散户投资者并重振 VC 代币市场。虽然这种观点承认高 FDV 的缺点,但它主要侧重于通过保持较低的估值和制造市场炒作来吸引散户投资者。

然而,这还远远不够。长期可持续的方法不应仅仅降低估值,而应创造真正的价值和效用,让散户投资者和更广泛的社区产生共鸣。重点应放在透明度、现实的估值和促进有机增长上,而不仅仅是眼前的市场兴奋。

构建可持续的区块链生态系统

区块链行业仍处于起步阶段,而如今代币发行的管理方式将决定生态系统的未来。市场衍生的 FDV 方法呼吁其他项目优先考虑透明度、长期效用和社区信任,而不是短期收益。

区块链行业正处于十字路口。继续走低流通量、高 FDV 发行的道路只会导致更多的市场不稳定和投资者的失望。通过采用市场衍生的 FDV 方法,项目可以建立更强大、更具弹性的生态系统,让所有参与者受益。现在是时候让行业专注于打造真正的产品了,而不是专注于下一个闪亮的新代币。

Related Reads

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

Hiring in Crypto: Balancing Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent As the crypto industry grows, founders face the dilemma of whether to prioritize hiring professionals with blockchain experience or those with traditional tech backgrounds who can learn. The key is recognizing that crypto companies are still tech companies at their core and should apply proven hiring best practices. Crypto-native talent offers immediate productivity and is essential for roles involving high-stakes, specialized work like smart contract development, where errors can be catastrophic. However, traditional professionals from large-scale software companies bring valuable experience in scaling products, operational flexibility, and expertise in areas like fintech, UX, and security, which are crucial as crypto products target mainstream adoption. Recruiting requires tailored approaches. Some candidates may be hesitant due to crypto's volatility or complexity, while others are excited by its innovative potential. Assess candidates' motivations, curiosity, and alignment with the company's vision early. Emphasize the opportunity to shape technology's future and address financial incentives, such as token-based compensation, which can offer liquidity compared to traditional equity. Onboarding is critical. Identify knowledge gaps during hiring and design education programs, mentorship, knowledge-sharing sessions, and resources like blogs or courses to accelerate learning. Pairing new hires with experienced crypto professionals helps bridge gaps and fosters collaboration. Ultimately, successful teams blend both crypto-native and traditional talent, leveraging their strengths to drive innovation and growth.

marsbit57m ago

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

marsbit57m ago

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

On April 19, a major DeFi security breach occurred, resulting in the loss of approximately $292 million. The attack targeted Kelp DAO’s rsETH bridge contract built on LayerZero, with 116,500 rsETH stolen. The attacker initiated the exploit using funds from Tornado Cash and manipulated the LayerZero EndpointV2 contract to transfer the assets. Kelp DAO confirmed the incident and temporarily paused rsETH contracts across multiple networks while collaborating with security experts for investigation. Initial analysis suggests the root cause was a compromised private key on the source chain, with the contract secured by only a 1/1 validator set, making it vulnerable to a single malicious transaction. The attacker used the stolen rsETH as collateral on lending platforms—including Aave, Compound, and Euler—to borrow more liquid assets like WETH, accumulating over $236 million in debt. Aave alone accounted for $196 million of this amount. In response, Aave froze its rsETH markets and stated it would explore covering potential bad debt through its Umbrella safety module, which holds around $50 million in WETH. This incident follows another large exploit earlier in April, where Drift Protocol on Solana lost $280 million. The repeated high-value attacks raise concerns about DeFi security, even affecting major protocols like Aave. Users are advised to exercise caution, diversify holdings, and limit exposure to on-chain protocols until more robust security measures are established.

marsbit2h ago

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片