Паника, McDonald’s и прочие прелести крипты: обзор мемов

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2022-06-10Last updated on 2024-08-10

Очередная суббота — время, чтобы оглянуться назад и вспомнить: а что вообще происходило на рынке в последнее время. Ну а чтобы процесс прошел без слез и нервных истерик, предлагаем погрузиться в прошлое через призму мемов

Рассказываем, какие посты и по какому поводу поднимали настроение участникам криптосообщества на этой неделе.

В понедельник биткоин опускался до $49 000. О причинах погружения BTC редакция BeInCrypto писала ранее. Стремительное падение главной криптовалюты напугало многих инвесторов и стало поводом для появления в сети мемов.

«Крипта падает. Тем временем: новички, ходлеры, трейдеры».

Не обошлось без шуток о том, что падение рынка в начале августа оказалось крайне несправедливым.

Также опытные криптаны не упустили возможность напомнить о том, что вакансии в McDonald’s по-прежнему открыты для потерявших все сбережения горе-инвесторов.

«Работа в McDonald’s, криптоинвестор».

Впрочем, многие инвесторы предпочли не паниковать, а закупаться криптой, пока она на локальных минимумах. Некоторые участники рынка сочли такие действия крайне опасными.

«Как я вижу покупку крипты на падающем рынке».

Стремительное падение в начале недели быстро перешло в коррекцию. Многих впечатлили темпы восстановления рынка. Больше всего, кажется, удивились ходлеры, которые уже мысленно попрощались со своими деньгами.

Любите мемы так же, как их любим мы? Тогда ловите «добавку» — обзор за прошлую неделю.

Related Reads

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbit10m ago

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbit10m ago

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbit24m ago

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbit24m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片