回顾PlusToken案 加密市场如何再次被其牵动敏感神经

币界网Published on 2024-08-09Last updated on 2024-08-09

币界网报道:

作者:Revc,

一、前言

加密市场情绪还未在8月6日的暴跌中恢复,而8月7日一则关于Plustoken消息,再次牵动加密市场的敏感神经。

据Lookonchain的监测,数百个已经休眠了3.3年的钱包开始转移大批量的以太坊(ETH),可能涉及789,533枚ETH,约合20亿美元。链上追踪显示,这些资金来自一个名为“Plus Token Ponzi 2”的钱包。该钱包在2020年将789,533枚ETH分散到数千个钱包中,此后自2021年4月以来一直未有任何动静。

据链上分析师余烬监测,Plustoken相关钱包大部分已在2021年被出售,目前归集的仅有25,757枚 ETH。随机市场情绪获得安抚。

随后Arkham在X平台表示,Plustoken钱包与数十个钱包相关联,仅在过去12小时内就转移了4.647亿美元的ETH。

二、Plustoken事件梳理

案件背景

PlusToken 于2018年5月推出,声称是一个多功能跨链去中心化钱包和“智能狗搬砖”套利平台。通过宣传“币王”、“千倍币”、“8个月上涨82倍”等吸引眼球的口号,迅速吸引了大量投资者加入。该平台利用传销模式,通过推荐码邀请新会员,并要求缴纳至少500美元的加密货币作为门槛,以获取平台收益。

发展过程

2018年5月:PlusToken 推出

平台以“区块链钱包”和“智能搬砖”为幌子,吸引大量投资者。仅一年时间,注册会员数达到270万,最大层级达到3293层。

2019年6月27日:提现问题暴露,运营停滞

PlusToken 开始无法正常提现,引发了投资者的恐慌。尽管平台官方未对此作出解释,部分投资者依然选择相信平台,导致更多资金继续涌入。在平台停止运营后,Plustoken 账户仍然收到价值1.5亿人民币的加密货币,

2020年11月26日:二审宣判

2020年11月26日,江苏省盐城市中级人民法院对PlusToken案进行了二审判决,裁定没收该案中扣押的加密货币,并将所得资金及收益依法上缴国库。

三、资金去向

PlusToken通过庞氏骗局骗取了全球投资者20亿至29亿美元的加密货币。该平台主要依赖场外交易(OTC)渠道进行大规模的资金进出,并通过复杂的链上资产转移和混币服务来规避追踪。部分资金被用于购置房产和豪车,而其他部分则通过OTC市场变现。

2020年6月,78.95万枚以太坊(ETH),当时价值约1.919亿美元,从一个PlusToken钱包中被转移,并通过数百个中介钱包进行分散转移。

在2021年6月至9月期间,大部分Plustoken钱包中的以太坊(ETH)通过多个地址被转入了Bidesk交易所(该交易所于2021年底倒闭)。随后,这些ETH又从Bidesk交易所被转移至火币交易所。仅通过四个Bidesk存款地址转入的ETH数量就达到了268,843枚。

资金收缴国库

Plustoken涉及的加密货币总价值超过150亿元人民币。根据裁定书,执法部门共查获了194,775枚比特币、833,083枚以太坊、140万枚莱特币、2760万枚柚子币(EOS)、74,167枚达世币(DASH)、4.87亿枚瑞波币(XRP)、60亿枚狗狗币(DOGE)、79,581枚比特现金(BCH)和213,724枚泰达币(USDT)。最终,涉案组织者因传销诈骗被判刑,平台资金被依法没收。

小结

Plustoken相钱包的活动继续牵动投资者的敏感神经,并影响了近期ETH的走势。根据链上数据分析,这次钱包转移可能来自案件中已刑满释放人员操作。除了对市场行情的影响外,人们更为关注的是投资者在事件中遭受的巨大损失。自案件爆发以来,加密货币的价格已经上涨了数十倍。然而,在加密行业的早期阶段,许多投资者未能守住自己的财富。如果将当前的加密行业比作北美的淘金时代,它正释放出广阔的发展与财富增长空间。投资者需要确保资产安全,避免陷入庞氏骗局,从而享受时代发展的红利。

Related Reads

Billions in USDT Flee Korea. Police Powerless in the Fight Against Money Laundering

South Korea is facing a severe and rapidly escalating challenge with crypto-based money laundering. Police data shows cases surged 152-fold in the first half of 2026 compared to all of 2025, with laundering now constituting 79.4% of all detected crypto-related crimes. The primary method is the "Hwanchigi" scheme, which uses cryptocurrency transfers to move illicit funds overseas, bypassing the regulated banking system. Tether (USDT) is the preferred vehicle for converting proceeds from drug trafficking, illegal gambling, and phishing into dollars before moving them to offshore exchanges. Despite enhanced monitoring and enforcement efforts, a stark gap exists between detection and prosecution. While authorities tracked and blocked millions in illegal assets in high-profile cases, arrests have lagged dramatically. In the first half of 2026, only 18 arrests were made despite over 1,200 detected cases. Customs seized approximately $4.92 billion in illegal foreign exchange operations, with over 90% of crypto-related crimes for prosecution flowing through unlicensed channels. The situation highlights a systemic disconnect: blockchain analytics can track transactions nearly in real-time, but the judicial process moves slowly. This asymmetry raises questions about whether detection statistics alone are a meaningful measure of effectiveness in combating money laundering, as the low cost and high speed of these schemes allow criminal networks to scale faster than law enforcement can respond.

cryptonews.ru1m ago

Billions in USDT Flee Korea. Police Powerless in the Fight Against Money Laundering

cryptonews.ru1m ago

The $6.4 Billion CRO Accumulation Plan of Trump Media Group Falls Apart

A $6.4 billion plan to create a publicly-listed CRO treasury company, announced a year ago by Trump Media & Technology Group (DJT), Crypto.com, and SPAC Yorkville, has been terminated. The ambitious deal, which aimed to accumulate approximately 6.3 billion CRO tokens (nearly 20% of supply at the time), never progressed beyond a framework agreement. Related plans for a prediction market integrated into Truth Social and ETF custody services by Crypto.com were also shelved, scaled back to a simple marketing partnership. The collaboration followed significant political alignment, with Crypto.com donating to Trump's inauguration and a pro-Trump super PAC, and its CEO meeting with Trump. The SEC also closed an investigation into the exchange shortly before the deal was announced, raising conflict-of-interest concerns. Officially, the termination was attributed to an unfavorable market environment. CRO's price has fallen roughly 70% since the announcement, and the broader market for publicly-traded digital asset treasuries has cooled significantly, with Bitcoin nearly halving from its late-2025 peak. The only completed transaction from the 2025 agreements remains intact: Trump Media's ~$105 million CRO purchase and Crypto.com's $50 million purchase of DJT stock. The termination aligns with DJT's strategic pivot away from crypto; the company is now pursuing a multi-billion dollar all-stock merger with nuclear fusion firm TAE Technologies, shifting its focus to clean energy.

marsbit16m ago

The $6.4 Billion CRO Accumulation Plan of Trump Media Group Falls Apart

marsbit16m ago

Tiger Research: The $43 Million Gray Area of Asian Prediction Markets

Tiger Research: Asia's $43 Million Grey Zone in Prediction Markets Western jurisdictions have created regulatory pathways for prediction markets through derivatives law (like the U.S. CFTC framework) or flexible gambling licenses (like the UK's "betting intermediary" category). In contrast, Asia lacks a comparable regulatory architecture. The absence of a general gambling license framework adaptable to private operators, coupled with closed financial product definitions (e.g., positive lists of assets in Korea and Japan), leaves prediction markets in a regulatory grey area. This lack of a clear classification—whether as gambling, financial derivatives, or a novel third category—has not stopped market activity. Significant liquidity, evidenced by over $52 million tied to a single South Korean election, flows to offshore platforms. However, this results in forgone tax revenue (estimated at $4-43 million annually per major Asian market), no consumer protection, and no oversight for market integrity. The core issue is not cultural opposition to gambling, which exists legally in many Asian markets, but a missing institutional design. Without a deliberate regulatory pathway, authorities are left with suboptimal options: expanding criminal sanctions or blocking access, which fail to address the underlying economic activity or achieve key policy goals. Establishing a regulatory foundation requires initiating a formal public discourse to first define prediction markets' legal status and societal value, a foundational step that has yet to occur in most Asian jurisdictions.

marsbit26m ago

Tiger Research: The $43 Million Gray Area of Asian Prediction Markets

marsbit26m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片