一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-08-07Last updated on 2024-08-07

Abstract

本周的第一个撸毛机会是Bracket,一个旨在提高流动质押和流动再质押代币收益的平台。

原文作者:HANGRY

原文编译:深潮 TechFlow

早安,谦卑的撸毛党们!

尽管市场可能出现波动,但我们有一些新的农场来帮助你振奋精神。

以下是本周的谦卑撸毛。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

1.Bracket

本周的第一个撸毛机会是 Bracket,一个旨在提高流动质押和流动再质押代币收益的平台。

Bracket 刚刚在主网推出,你可以通过存入获得 Bars、ETH 收益和 LRT 积分。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

要开始赚取收益,只需存入你选择的流动质押或流动再质押代币即可。

你可以获得多种积分加成,如果现在存入,你将获得 200% 的积分加成。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

2.Elixir

接下来是 Elixir,一个旨在推动整个 DeFi 流动性的模块化网络。

我们之前提到过 Elixir,他们刚刚宣布了一项为期 10 周的新积分活动,针对新的 deUSD 稳定币。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

Elixir 采用类似于 Ethena 稳定币的方法,deUSD 是一种原生的收益生成稳定币,利用 stETH、sDAI 和资金利率套利。

持有者可以使用 deUSD 稳定币进行质押或提供流动性,从而赚取收益和积分。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

3.Avantis

本周的下一个农场是 Avantis,一个支持 RWAs 以及各种代币的 Base 上的永续交易所。

Avantis 当前正在进行针对交易者、流动性提供者和推荐者的积分计划。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

根据你的风险承受能力,用户可以选择在 Junior 或 Senior 级别存款,以赚取 USDC 的收益。

尽管他们的容量几乎已满,但这是一个在赚取 XP 的同时停放稳定币的理想之地。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

4.Smilee

接下来是 Smilee,一个波动率交易平台,使用户能够以高杠杆进行资产的多头/空头交易。

除了在 Arbitrum 部署外,Smilee 刚刚在 Berachain bArtio 测试网上线。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

Smilee 是最新一轮 ARB 激励的受益者,目前提供流动性的收益相当可观。

如你所见,流动性提供者可以根据选择的交易对赚取双位数甚至三位数的收益。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

5.Flat Money

本周的最后一个撸毛机会是 Flat Money,一个由 rETH 支持的资本高效平币。

Flat Money 本质上是一个去中心化的 Ethena,协议通过对自身的永续交易所进行对冲来捕获资金和质押收益。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

通过铸造 UNIT,你可以获得来自 Flat Money 交易所上 rETH 杠杆交易者支付的费用,收益通常在 20-30% APY 之间。

另一方面,交易者可以以极低的资金利率访问 ETH 永续合约,同时赚取积分。

一览本周值得关注的5个DeFi撸毛项目

原文链接

Related Reads

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit35m ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit35m ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit2h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit2h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit2h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片