观点:「链抽象」会成为「模块化」之后的大热门

深潮Published on 2024-08-05Last updated on 2024-08-05

「链抽象」短期内也会有 infra application 的叙事为主阶段。

撰文:Haotian

@ParticleNtwrk 获得 Binance labs 投资的消息引发了市场热议。有人说这是 $PARTI 提前锁定币安的市场信号,我反倒想再次强化输出下观点:「链抽象」会成为「模块化」之后的大热门,VC、交易所热捧之外,整个赛道上下游配套已经耕耘许久了。

1)虽然链抽象和模块化同宗同脉,但模块化目标提高开发组合效率,能促进市场基建面的繁荣,链抽象的目标则是增强用户体验为快速扩大增量用户进场铺路。因此,二者本质上都是向 Crypto 注入生产力效能,「链抽象」更接地气一些,是「模块化」的下一站。

2)「链抽象」乍一看也是空泛的叙事,但链抽象走向前台说明市场开发资源已经很充分,竞争环境已然很严峻了。道理很简单,模块化只需选中 DA 层、Execution 层、interoperability 层等任意一个层,打一个差异化的点就可以勾勒出一番宏大盛景,链抽象显然不能够了。

「链抽象」需要在市场运营面、资源触达面、资金累积面、用户体验口碑面等都要出彩才行。Particle Network 就是其中一个佼佼者。

3)「链抽象」背后有很强的 web2「成熟」产品力输入。都在诟病过往 web3 世界的钱包、链、协议等还是「草台班子」,但随着 web 主流资本、人才的卷入,web2 的产品、运营、商业体系也都逐步向 web3 渗透。很长一段时间,这类产品以默默耕耘为主,不过「链抽象」叙事走向焦点叙事舞台,会给它们更多浮出水面的机会。

4)除了 Particle 之外,我随便再例举上下游几个项目:

1)@ProjectZKM 基于 ZK 技术做统一流动性聚合调动中心,抽象了 EVM 和 BTC 等 Non-EVM 的链的流动性;

2)@dappOS_com 推出了 Solver 执行网络,从应用服务端切入带动 intent 交易范式的转移;

3)@ApertureFinance 集成 intent 定制化交易体验,通过应用在 B 端机构和 C 端用户方向已经累积了庞大用户基础;

4)@cyclenetwork_GO 主打 Bridgeless 的全链流动性统一服务协议,也有币安孵化支持;

此外,还有很多诸如 @NEARProtocol ,@bentobatch ,@khalani_network 等做前端体验优化甚至集成 AI Agent 的应用和服务平台等等。

从 ERC4337 等标准上游到做统一流动性调度层的服务协议,再到已经直面消费市场在 B 端和 C 端都有用户受众累积的应用,整个链抽象赛道相较之下偏成熟一些,有更切实际的应用场景和完善的商业预期想象空间。(二级市场的估值标准也会有所不同。

整体而言,「链抽象」短期内也会有 infra > application 的叙事为主阶段,很多担心有 Fomo 出一堆协议和链来,重走模块化的老路,但链抽象需要综合实力的比拼,洗牌和竞争会更快,关键其背后反衬出来的行业演化方向和成熟产品力的推动进步意义不容小觑,值得长期关注挖宝。

Related Reads

From Corning to Ciena: The 10X Stock Opportunities in the AI Optical Communication Chain

From Copper to Light: The AI-Driven Optical Communication Supply Chain and Investment Opportunities The exponential data demands of AI are pushing data centers beyond the physical limits of copper cables, forcing a critical transition to optical communication. This shift from electrical to photonic signals over distances greater than ~3 feet solves heat, power, and bandwidth constraints. The real investment opportunity lies not just in headline chipmakers, but across the entire essential photonics supply chain. **Key Investment Layers & Companies:** * **Glass & Fiber:** **Corning** is a dominant, irreplaceable supplier of advanced fiber to all major cloud/AI players (Meta, Amazon, Google, MSFT, OpenAI, NVIDIA), with multi-billion-dollar, multi-year contracts locked in years ahead of delivery. Its profit growth (93%) far outpaces revenue growth (36%), showing pricing power. * **Interconnects:** **Amphenol**, a consolidating giant in high-speed connectors (both copper and optical), shows robust growth (>80% in AI data centers) and expanding margins post-acquisition. **Credo Technology** bridges old and new worlds, extending copper's life in racks while moving into optics. It has hyper-growth but carries high customer concentration risk. * **Systems:** **Ciena** is a leader in coherent optics, enabling massive data capacity upgrades on existing fiber. It has a massive, growing order backlog ($~7B) and strong ties with cloud providers. * **Upstream & Enablers:** **AXT** produces mission-critical indium phosphide wafers for lasers, creating a supply bottleneck, but faces significant geopolitical/export license risk from its China-based manufacturing. **VEO Solutions** is the essential "picks and shovels" play, providing test equipment needed by every component in the optical chain, regardless of the eventual winner. A new pure-play photonics ETF (**FOTO**) offers a consolidated investment vehicle for this theme, though it is new and small. The core thesis is clear: the move from copper to light is inevitable and accelerating, with wealth creation spreading across this critical, multi-layered supply chain.

marsbit6m ago

From Corning to Ciena: The 10X Stock Opportunities in the AI Optical Communication Chain

marsbit6m ago

A Chip Company Releases AIDC Energy Storage Certification Standards. Why NVIDIA? Computing Power Reshapes Power Supply Logic. Who's in the Lead and Who's Left Out?

NVIDIA has released a "Battery Energy Storage System Self-Certification Guide," setting strict technical standards for energy storage systems specifically for AI data centers (AIDC). The guide focuses solely on certifying the Power Conversion System (PCS), not the batteries, with 10 mandatory performance metrics and 12 validation tests requiring real-world and simulation comparisons. Key requirements include rapid dynamic response to AI workloads, high-frequency system telemetry, and detailed electromagnetic transient models. The move is driven by the extreme and fluctuating power demands of next-generation AI hardware. Modern AIDCs require energy storage systems to act as intelligent, controllable grid assets, not just passive backup, to manage instantaneous, massive power load shifts that traditional UPS systems cannot handle. This redefines the competitive landscape for energy storage providers, shifting focus from capacity and cost to advanced control capabilities and system integration. While the market potential is significant—with forecasts of hundreds of GWh in new demand by 2030—the certification creates a high barrier to entry. It requires proven PCS delivery volumes and credible plans for rapid capacity scaling, favoring established, well-resourced players. Early movers like Fluence (partnering with Siemens) and several Chinese companies have secured projects ahead of the standard, but new entrants must now navigate this rigorous, costly, and time-intensive certification process to compete in the AIDC energy storage market.

marsbit53m ago

A Chip Company Releases AIDC Energy Storage Certification Standards. Why NVIDIA? Computing Power Reshapes Power Supply Logic. Who's in the Lead and Who's Left Out?

marsbit53m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片