Coinbase报告第二季度收入14亿美元:ETF如何帮助盈利

币界网Published on 2024-08-02Last updated on 2024-08-02

币界网报道:
    Coinbase报告称,2024年第二季度的收入为14亿美元。该交易所公布了第三个盈利季度。

全球加密货币采用率的增长和机构投资者的增加意味着,尽管加密货币存在波动,但加密货币交易所的收入仍在增加。

因此,美国领先的加密货币交易平台Coinbase发布了2024年第二季度报告。根据报告,该交易所连续第三个季度盈利。

Coinbase报告收入14亿美元,但收入下降11%

2024年第二季度,Coinbase的收入为14亿美元。然而,收入比上一季度有所下降。

2024年第一季度,该交易所报告了16亿美元;因此,最近的14亿美元比上一季度下降了11%。

值得注意的是,该交易所的14亿美元收入使其净收入达到3600万美元。Coinbase在其官方报告中表示,

“尽管我们的收入连续下降,但我们的盈利能力在第二季度表现稳健。净收入为3600万美元,受到与我们的投资组合相关的3.19亿美元税前加密资产损失的影响。其中绝大多数未实现。”

报告继续说,

“这些损失代表了2.48亿美元的税后费用。我们调整后的息税折旧摊销前利润为5.96亿美元,我们的资产负债表仍然强劲,因为我们在第二季度末拥有78亿美元的资源,比上季度增加了7.33亿美元。”

在过去的几个月里,11%的收入下降是由加密货币的波动引起的。同样,该交易所的交易量也有所下降,导致收入下降。

该交易所报告收入下降27%,至7.81亿美元,仅报告服务收入增加至5.99亿美元。

然而,该公司的股票在过去六个月里上涨了64.56%,股价年初至今上涨了35.54%。

尽管公布了盈利能力,但在第二季度报告中,交易所股票在过去24小时内下跌了5.22%,截至发稿时为11.72。

ETF的利润

Coinbase是大多数ETF的主要托管人,这使交易所从托管费中受益匪浅。对于新手来说,Coinbase收取0.2%的托管费,使其相对实惠。

随着现货ETF的兴起,Coinbase是10只比特币[BTC]ETF和8只以太坊[ETH]ETF的托管人。这使得该平台在这些领域占据主导地位,尽管它只占第二季度收入的一小部分。

Alesia Haas指出了ETF的重要性,并补充说,

“ETF对我们的行业来说非常棒。它们确实在我们的产品平台上产生了飞轮式的活动,并在整个生态系统中产生了更深入的参与。”

Coinbase呼吁明确监管

通过第二季度报告,该交易所注意到最近监管变化更加明确,这已经变得有益。

Brian Armstrong指出了监管清晰的重要性以及制定明确规则和政策的必要性。他在声明中补充说,

“90%的机构投资者表示,监管的明确性将增强他们对加密货币投资的信心。因此,Coinbase将继续在法院、国会和11月的选举中推动明确的规则。”

因此,根据交易所的说法,美国需要建立清晰度,就像欧洲的MICA一样。

阿姆斯特朗认为,这种清晰度至关重要,将增加机构投资和其他大投资者的投资。该交易所指出,他们在第二季度花费了2600万美元来推动监管清晰度。

Related Reads

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

The article "Giants Launch the Context War, Reconstructing AI's Moat" discusses how leading AI companies—OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google—are shifting their competitive focus from model size to acquiring, managing, and utilizing user context (Context). Initially, Context referred to the length of text a model could process, leading to a "arms race" for longer context windows. However, the competition has evolved through three key phases: expanding text capacity (long context windows), enabling memory across sessions, and finally, integrating AI into real user environments like browsers and desktops to capture dynamic task states. Each company is pursuing a distinct strategy. OpenAI is building Context around the ChatGPT account, turning it into a central hub that accumulates user understanding across various integrated applications and tools. Anthropic, lacking a major user base, focuses on high-value verticals like coding, empowering its Claude model to actively gather Context through GUI interaction (Computer Use) and system connections (MCP protocol). Google, with vast existing user data from products like Search and Gmail, faces the challenge of restructuring this data into actionable, AI-understandable Context for its Gemini model within its ecosystem. The core argument is that the nature of competitive advantage in AI is changing. The internet era prized network effects—connecting more users. The AI era values "individual depth": the ability to build deep, task-specific understanding of a user. This creates a new moat through 1) the compounding value of accumulated Context, 2) deep integration with user tools and permissions, and 3) the establishment of trust for complex tasks. Therefore, the battle for Context is fundamentally about capturing "task entry points" and converting existing digital ecosystems into environments where AI can effectively understand and act, rather than merely scaling user numbers.

marsbit21m ago

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

marsbit21m ago

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手7h ago

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手7h ago

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbit10h ago

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbit10h ago

Dan Koe's New Essay: Escaping the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive the AI Replacement Wave?

Dan Koe argues that the true threat in the AI era isn't technology itself, but a reliance on others for one's livelihood and happiness. The core problem is "wage slavery"—spending life on unfulfilling work. To survive and thrive, one must escape this by building their own enterprise. The key is developing five elements: Agency (initiative), Taste (discernment), Persuasion, Persistence, and Iteration. These boil down to problem-solving skills and experiential knowledge, which cannot be learned passively but only through doing your own projects. The solution is to become "unemployable" by shifting your identity. This requires: 1) Radically changing your environment to force growth, 2) Choosing a medium (like content creation) that provides real feedback through trial and error, and 3) Mastering either code or, preferably, media (content). Content creation is more valuable because its subjective nature and need for human perspective create a durable advantage over generic AI output. To start, define your life's work by answering foundational questions about your innate knowledge, unique abilities, and contrarian beliefs. Then, immediately act by publishing your first piece of content. The cycle of creating, receiving feedback, and iterating is the essential path to developing the skills needed for an independent, meaningful career and financial resilience.

marsbit11h ago

Dan Koe's New Essay: Escaping the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive the AI Replacement Wave?

marsbit11h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片