随着投资者撤退、MATIC价格盘整持续

币界网Published on 2024-07-30Last updated on 2024-07-30

币界网报道:
  • MATIC 价格目前正在横盘整理,试图摆脱 0.54 美元以下的盘整。

  • 目前,只有略高于 8% 的 MATIC 持有者获利,其余的人仍在等待。

  • 尽管近期参与人数激增,但由于怀疑情绪依然存在,因此参与人数有所下降。

sYYL0e3Bc5bKPMvlb9JClQU7MtGmGZNhEjUTWSu2.jpeg

Polygon ( MATIC) 的价格在接下来的几个交易日中可能会出现缓慢复苏或不复苏。

其背后的原因在于投资者的行为,沮丧的情绪让他们不愿参与。

MATIC价格继续在 0.5 美元上方盘整

  • MATIC价格分析显示盘整于 0.5 美元上方。

  • MATIC的阻力位为 0.5729 美元

  • MATIC /USD 的支撑位为 0.5087 美元

7 月 23 日的MATIC价格分析证实, MATIC正在努力验证明确的趋势,因为它面临 0.5 美元左右的混合信号。 多头目前的目标是反弹至 0.55 美元以上。

Polygon 投资者失去动力

MATIC价格正面临近期缺乏增长的后果。目前,所有 MATIC 持有者中只有略高于 8% 的人获利,而大多数人仍在等待收益。 

利润实现的巨大差异影响了投资者的情绪和对市场的信心。因此,即使在近期价格飙升的情况下,参与度也明显下降。 

ix8RcQJdakFCMzm8OmgndcWWIjf0Si3Mo28LOY5i.jpeg

持有者普遍存在的怀疑态度加剧了这一趋势,许多投资者选择观望而不是积极投资。

这种悲观情绪和参与度的下降表明市场普遍缺乏信心。投资者不愿参与,这影响了整体流动性和交易量。不确定性正在创造一种谨慎的环境,价格不太可能出现大幅波动。

因此,MATIC的价格可能难以摆脱盘整阶段。如果参与度不提高,市场情绪不向更乐观的方向转变,MATIC 大幅上涨的可能性仍然很低。MATIC 要想实现突破,需要投资者信心增强,持有者参与度更高。

1xewUseXoj7QtOmjpKc5v8QRvnstosRke2hqgL4R.jpeg

展望未来,而非高于预期

MATIC价格为0.522美元,继续在 0.546 美元和 0.491 美元之间波动。这一区间已使山寨币保持盘整超过三周,这种情况可能会持续下去。

上述因素是造成这种情况的原因,如果它们的行为变得更加悲观,0.491 美元的支撑位可能会被打破。这将导致 Polygon 投资者进一步亏损。

Ww3wSryvF3UlucWTXzLMiJbrT1kZ7Xq99Xk6ZUA0.jpeg

然而,如果突破 0.54 美元的阻力位,复苏很有可能重启。同样,需要确保 0.54 美元作为支撑底线,才能将山寨币推高至 0.60 美元及以上。

尾结

从长远来看, MATIC 此外,Polygon 与不同行业合作以提高采用率,重点关注NFT解决方案和Ethereum可扩展性。随着 Polygon 继续扩大其产品范围,它在山寨币市场中占据了重要地位。 因此, MATIC可能是一个很好的长期投资选择。  

Related Reads

The War Without a Unified Name: The Domestic Tech Giants' World Model Landscape

The article outlines the diverse and fragmented landscape of "World Models" in China's tech industry, where major players are pursuing similar goals under different names like world foundational models, physical AI, or integrated within autonomous driving and embodied intelligence systems. The core aim is to enable AI to create an internal, dynamic environment for simulation, reasoning, and learning, reducing reliance on infinite real-world data. This "data engine" allows for unlimited generation, experimentation, and iteration. The report categorizes the approaches of different companies: * **Internet Giants:** Alibaba is developing models for linguistic, virtual, and physical worlds (Qwen-AgentWorld, HappyOyster, Qwen-RobotWorld). Tencent's HY-World focuses on 3D, game, and social scenarios. ByteDance leverages its vast video data for a potential "digital twin" model. Huawei integrates its model into industrial applications like smart cars and robotics without separately branding it. Baidu embeds world model capabilities within its Apollo autonomous driving and Ernie systems. * **Automakers:** Companies like NIO, Li Auto, XPeng, and Geely are using world models as virtual "driving schools" and "testing grounds." They generate complex scenarios (e.g., rain, snow) to train and validate autonomous driving systems in simulation, aiming for more capable and safer AI drivers. * **Autonomous Driving Suppliers:** Firms such as Momenta, Horizon Robotics, Haomo.ai, and DeepRoute.ai are building the underlying "world engines." They focus on large-scale video generation for simulation, reinforcement learning, and enhancing end-to-end autonomous driving models, often integrating these capabilities into commercial products. While startups bring focus and innovation, they face challenges like limited data, compute resources, and deployment channels. Large companies possess these advantages and are rapidly transitioning world models from research projects into core business infrastructure powering products in vehicles, games, and industry. The conclusion is that world models represent an evolution and convergence of existing AI fields into crucial industrial infrastructure, moving the competition from simply building a model to effectively deploying it to understand and interact with the physical world.

marsbit13m ago

The War Without a Unified Name: The Domestic Tech Giants' World Model Landscape

marsbit13m ago

The Crypto Industry Enters the 'Show Me' Era: Vision Alone Is No Longer Enough

The crypto industry has entered a "Show Me" era, where grand visions and white papers are no longer sufficient to gain traction. This shift is driven by increased skepticism, high-profile bad actors, and notably, the serious entry of traditional finance (TradFi) institutions like BlackRock, Fidelity, and JPMorgan Chase, which are launching real, scaled products such as tokenized funds and blockchain-based settlement. This raises the bar for what constitutes a credible project. The communication dynamic has fundamentally changed. The focus is no longer on "what you are building" but on "what you have built and who is using it." Startups must now provide a "proof stack": verifiable data like mainnet transaction volume and active wallets, genuine partnerships with signed contracts, and evidence of organic product-market fit from real users, not just investors. Announcements must be backed by concrete, chain-verifiable evidence. For communication strategies, this means leading with proven facts and hard data—even if modest—rather than speculative narratives. A compelling story must be grounded in demonstrated results. While vision remains important, the balance has inverted from 80% vision/20% substance to the opposite. This higher threshold ultimately benefits builders with genuine traction, filtering out noise and allowing their real signals to stand out clearly. The "Show Me" era is a permanent maturation, demanding that communication strategies prove value, not just promise it.

链捕手44m ago

The Crypto Industry Enters the 'Show Me' Era: Vision Alone Is No Longer Enough

链捕手44m ago

Meta Follows the Trend into Prediction Markets: Can It Avoid Repeating the Failure of the Metaverse?

Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook, has reportedly formed a team to develop "Arena," a new application focused on prediction markets. Users would use platform points to place bets on outcomes in politics, sports, and global events. This move follows Meta's massive, nearly $900 billion, losses from its heavily-invested metaverse division, Reality Labs. The prediction market industry is already showing strong demand, with leading platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket facilitating hundreds of billions in annual volume. Meta, with its 3.56 billion daily active users across its apps, possesses the unprecedented scale to bring this niche activity to a mainstream audience, similar to its past success in cloning features like Stories and Reels. However, Arena faces significant hurdles. Meta plans to start with a points-based system to avoid strict financial regulations, but this may dilute the core incentive of accurate prediction that real-money markets provide. More critically, Meta enters the space with a major trust deficit stemming from its past regulatory battles, notably the failed Libra/Diem stablecoin project, and its controversial history with political content and misinformation. The prediction market sector itself is under increasing regulatory scrutiny, with recent CFTC actions including fines and the first-ever insider trading case. While Meta's vast user base offers a unique opportunity to expand the market, its success hinges on navigating complex regulations and rebuilding the credibility necessary for a platform dealing with sensitive topics like elections. The outcome could range from Meta dramatically growing the industry to Arena becoming a high-profile regulatory target before it can scale.

Foresight News1h ago

Meta Follows the Trend into Prediction Markets: Can It Avoid Repeating the Failure of the Metaverse?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片