Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-07-30Last updated on 2024-07-30

Abstract

现货ETF和稳定币带来新需求,FTX现金分配可能推动资金流入。

原文作者:Crypto, Distilled

原文编译:白话区块链

Coinbase 刚刚发布了 2024 年第三季度的《加密货币展望》。这份报告内容丰富,@DistilledCrypto 读完了全部 60 页,总结了以下你需要了解的 10 个主要要点。

Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

1、MVRV 与市场趋势

当 MVRV 高于其 365 天平均值时,表明市场处于强劲的上升趋势中。

在 MVRV 有支撑的情况下出现的回调,通常是买入机会。

目前,MVRV 已经从支撑位反弹,这表明上升趋势依然存在。

Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

2、比特币从周期低点的投资回报率

比特币已经完成了四个市场周期,每个周期都有牛市和熊市阶段。

在本轮周期中,自 2022 年 11 月的低点以来,比特币上涨了约 400% 。

这一周期类似于 2018 年至 2022 年的周期,当时比特币从低点上涨了 2000% 。

Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

3、较小的回调

比特币牛市周期通常伴随着指数级增长和大幅回调。

本轮周期有所不同,呈现出较小的回调:有八次回调在 5% -20% 之间,两次在 20% -30% 之间,且没有超过 30% 的回调。

Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

4、加密货币相关性下降

在第二季度,加密资产的相关性下降:以太坊的相关性为 0.7 ,一些山寨币低于 0.5 。

这种脱钩现象表明市场对 Token 基本面的理解更加深入。

随着监管透明度的提高和机构采纳,预计相关性将进一步下降。

Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

5、波动性认知与现实

认知:对许多投资者而言,数字资产的波动性过大。

现实:加密货币市场的波动性与一些市值庞大的主流科技股相当。

Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

6、现货 ETF 的影响

现货 ETF 为比特币带来了显著的新需求,而新的比特币供应仍然仅限于矿工的奖励。

自现货 ETF 开始交易以来,ETF 的需求大大超过了比特币的发行量。

Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

7、以太坊市场周期

以太坊已经完成了两个完整的市场周期。

本轮周期自 2022 年开始,自 2022 年 11 月以来,以太坊上涨了超过 240% 。

这一周期类似于 2018 年至 2022 年期间,当时以太坊从低点上涨了 6000% 。

Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

8、以太坊的总锁定价值(TVL)

TVL 追踪智能合约和去中心化应用(dApps)中山寨币和稳定币的价值。它反映了金融活动和流动性。

在第二季度,TVL 增长了 9% ,表明以太坊区块链上的活动有所增加。

Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

9、FTX 现金分配

FTX 将进行现金分配,如果接收者将其重新投资,可能会导致大量加密货币流入。

关键日期: 8 月 16 日(受托人投票)和 10 月 7 日(法院批准的最后期限)。

10、稳定币

稳定币的市值为 1625 亿美元,在两周内增加了 20 亿美元,超过了 3AC 前的水平。

作为加密货币流动性的体现,稳定币是长期价格预测的重要指标。

随着资本的流入,难以支持看跌的市场前景。

Coinbase2024年Q3前瞻:上升趋势明显,加密相关性下降

最后,感谢 @CoinbaseInsto 和 @glassnode 提供的见解!本文纯属教育内容,不构成投资建议。

原文链接

Related Reads

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

On August 19, 2026, the U.S. Treasury unexpectedly announced it would at least double the size of its long-term Treasury buyback operations, starting September 9. The move triggered an immediate market reaction, with the 30-year yield falling 9 basis points. This intervention came against a backdrop of the 30-year yield hitting a 19-year high of 5.34% the previous day, driven by persistent inflation, high oil prices, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health with public debt surpassing $40 trillion, and a global "buyers' strike" for long-dated bonds. Treasury buybacks involve the government repurchasing older, less liquid bonds from the market via reverse auctions to improve market functioning, not to reduce overall debt. While the action provided tactical relief and signaled the Treasury's willingness to intervene, analysts caution it does not address core structural issues: massive fiscal deficits, high borrowing needs, and fading demand from traditional buyers like foreign central banks. For investors, the announcement offered short-term support for long-duration bond ETFs and boosted assets like gold, which rose 2.7%. However, it's unlikely to significantly lower mortgage rates or alter the challenging environment for long-term bonds. The key takeaway is the distinction between a tactical market operation and the unresolved structural pressures that continue to push yields higher, requiring close monitoring of upcoming economic data, Treasury auctions, and potential signals of more aggressive policy measures.

marsbit6m ago

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

marsbit6m ago

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

Following an unscheduled announcement from the U.S. Treasury Department on August 19th, investor discussions have intensified regarding the potential for future policy interventions in long-term bond markets. The Treasury increased the maximum size of its regular buyback operations for 10-to-30 year bonds from $2 billion to $4 billion, citing a desire to improve liquidity. This move came shortly after a surge in long-term yields, with the 30-year Treasury yield briefly touching 5.34%. Market analysts, rather than focusing on the modest operational size, have interpreted the timing—outside the normal quarterly communication window—as a significant signal. The move has been dubbed the "Bessent Put," implying the market's growing expectation that Treasury officials, led by Deputy Secretary Josh Bessent, may act to prevent a disorderly rise in long-term borrowing costs. This perception represents a potential shift in the market's view of the government's "policy reaction function." The underlying pressures on long-term bonds are multifaceted, including large fiscal deficits, increased Treasury supply, a rise in corporate debt issuance for AI infrastructure (creating a "crowding out" effect), and uncertainty around foreign holdings, particularly from Japan. Geopolitical risks in the Middle East further complicate the policy landscape, potentially creating conflicting pressures between fighting inflation and managing financing costs. However, the article clarifies that this Treasury buyback program is distinct from Quantitative Easing (QE). It is a debt management operation, not a Federal Reserve balance sheet expansion. While the announcement opens the door for market speculation about more forceful tools like Yield Curve Control (YCC) or a return to QE, analysts note that conditions would need to deteriorate significantly for such measures to be implemented. For now, the "Bessent Put" reflects a change in market expectations about possible policy boundaries, not an imminent launch of new monetary stimulus.

marsbit6m ago

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

marsbit6m ago

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

"Is Stablecoin Truly Necessary for Cross-Border Payments? While stablecoins are often praised as superior for cross-border transfers—especially if the recipient desires crypto—their advantage is less clear in traditional cross-currency scenarios (e.g., USD to Mexican Peso). The existing correspondent banking system is slow and costly (≈15% fees) due to multiple intermediaries. Modern fintech solutions like Wise have dramatically improved this by using a netting model: they hold local currency pools and settle payments domestically, avoiding actual cross-border fund movement. This offers near-instant transfers with low, transparent fees (averaging ~0.52%). The 'stablecoin sandwich' model (convert fiat to stablecoin, transfer on-chain, convert to local fiat) offers similar user experience but doesn't inherently provide major cost or speed advantages over fintech. Its on-chain transfer is cheap, but fiat conversion spreads remain. Stablecoin's real innovation is 'unbundling' the cross-border payment stack. Instead of requiring a proprietary global network like Wise, businesses only need reliable on- and off-ramps in specific corridors. This lowers market entry barriers, fosters competition among local providers, and can drive down costs, particularly for niche or underserved corridors (e.g., US to Africa). While vertical integration may reoccur, the open, permissionless nature of the underlying blockchain layer makes monopolistic pricing difficult. The long-term benefit is the potential redistribution of value—previously captured as intermediary rents—to consumers through lower costs."

marsbit10m ago

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

marsbit10m ago

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

Ethereum has surged above $2,300, a level not seen in over three months, marking a significant recovery and technical breakthrough by reclaiming key resistance levels, including the weekly EMA50 for the first time in the current bear market. The rally has been fueled by a combination of factors: improved market risk appetite, positive regulatory sentiment, and a major short squeeze where over 88% of recent ETH liquidations were short positions. The ETH/BTC ratio has also broken its long-term downtrend, indicating renewed strength for Ethereum relative to Bitcoin. Fundamentally, Ethereum spot ETFs have shown strong inflows, outperforming their Bitcoin counterparts in recent months. Wall Street institutions like Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan have notably increased their ETH exposure, while several banks have added or expanded positions in ETH ETFs. On-chain fundamentals remain robust, with the proportion of staked ETH reaching a new all-time high of nearly 33.7%. Data indicates long-term holding sentiment, as small wallet holdings increased while large outflows were often directed towards staking or contracts, not selling. However, potential headwinds include declining staking yields and community debate over proposals to adjust staking rewards at high participation levels. The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade, featuring improvements to validator exit efficiency, could enhance liquidity and further attract institutional stakers. While the rebound is supported by sentiment, capital flows, and fundamentals, its sustainability hinges on continued positive developments.

marsbit10m ago

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

marsbit10m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片