特朗普宣布!

币界网Published on 2024-07-28Last updated on 2024-07-28

币界网报道:


中国基金报 安曼

一觉醒来,比特币沸腾了!

美东时间7月27日,美国前总统特朗普在比特币2024大会上宣布,如果他能重返白宫,他将把比特币列为美国战略储备资产。


在他讲话期间,比特币价格上演V型大逆转,一度突破6.9万美元。不过截至发稿,比特币价格再度回落至6.8万美元一线。


值得注意的是,特朗普此前在担任美国总统期间,曾宣称比特币“不是钱”,并批评它是“高度不稳定,毫无根据的东西”。他警告说,加密资产助长了非法地下市场的发展。

“我们在美国只有一个真正的货币,它比以往任何时候都更强大,”特朗普在2019年的推文中写道。“它被称为美元!”

特朗普大反转

为了获得加密货币群体的选票,特朗普拼了!

在美国田纳西州纳什维尔举行的比特币2024大会上,美国前总统特朗普出席并发表了主题演讲。会上,特朗普宣布,如果他能重返白宫的话,他将确保政府100%保留其拥有的比特币,并会将比特币列为美国战略储备资产。

据了解,目前,美国政府拥有超过21万枚比特币,这些比特币是通过非法行动如暗网市场四路和庞氏骗局BitConnect等没收的。截至目前,这些比特币的价值约为140亿美元。

特朗普表示:“我将制定我的计划,以确保美国成为地球上的加密货币之都和比特币超级大国。”

特朗普还给出了计划的大致轮廓。例如,如果当选,将任命一个比特币总统委员会。将保留美国所有的比特币工作岗位。希望加密货币在美国被开采。为了方便加密数字领域采矿,将在供电领域加大力度,发展燃料发电、核电以及其他环境友好型发电方式等。

他还称,在他担任总统期间,永远不会有央行数字货币(CBDC)。

他向台下一众欢呼的比特币支持者承诺。“我当选的第一天就会解雇美国证监会主席根斯勒。”据悉,尽管美国证监会在今年1月批准了11只比特币ETF现货的上市和交易,但是根斯勒个人对于比特币和加密货币投资的风险保持了明确的警示态度,并且强调了更多的监管重要性。

美国首位接受加密货币捐款的总统竞选人

值得注意的是,周六演讲结束后,特朗普还在纳什维尔举办了一场小型的筹款活动——参与的门槛从6万美元至84万美元不等。组织比特币2024大会的Bitcoin Magazin首席执行官David Bailey承诺要为特朗普筹集1亿美元的捐赠,并动员超过500万选民支持特朗普。

事实上,特朗普对加密货币政策的大反转,早有预兆。今年5月,还是美国共和党总统竞选提名人的特朗普就宣布,他接受比特币、以太币、狗狗币、索拉纳币和其他加密货币作为捐款,成为首位接受数字货币捐款的总统竞选人。

本月早些时候,特朗普还任命支持比特币和加密货币的前风险投资家詹姆斯·万斯为其2024年的竞选伙伴。

据外媒报道,特朗普已经与特斯拉CEO埃隆·马斯克讨论了加密货币政策。他还在自己的海湖庄园接待了加密矿业公司的高管,并发誓要减轻Ross Ulbricht的刑期,而Ross Ulbricht曾因运营暗网市场丝路而被判无期徒刑。该网站为确保匿名性,仅以比特币为交易介质。

这一系列操作显然赢得了部分加密货币支持者的选票。近日,据CNBC报道,特朗普竞选团队的人员此前透露,从5月份以来,该团队已经收到了价值超过400万美元的各类加密货币,捐助者来自12个州。

另据OpenSecrets的数据,加密行业捐助者为2024年大选投入的资金超过了之前所有周期的总和。

不仅特朗普态度转变,当地时间周五,美国独立总统候选人小罗伯特·肯尼迪在演讲中承诺,若他能当选总统,将启动一个400万枚比特币的储备计划,并将要求政府每天购买550枚比特币,直到储备达到400万枚。这反映了加密货币用户在本届选举期间已成为一股逐渐壮大的政治势力。

编辑:舰长

审核:木鱼

版权声明

《中国基金报》对本平台所刊载的原创内容享有著作权,未经授权禁止转载,否则将追究法律责任。

授权转载合作联系人:于先生(电话:0755-82468670)

Related Reads

Interview with PPP: How the World Cup Ignited the Prediction Market, and How to Find "Replicable Smart Money"?

Interview with PPP: World Cup Ignites Prediction Markets, How to Find “Replicable Smart Money”? With the World Cup underway, prediction markets are experiencing a historic surge in data and activity. However, most ordinary users struggle to achieve consistent profits amidst the volatility. Simply chasing "smart money" signals on social media is often ineffective due to slow manual execution. Even dedicated copy-trading tools can be misleading, as high total profits don't guarantee a strategy is suitable or sustainable for others to follow. Prediction market strategy platform PPP (Prediction Position Platform) argues that not all profitable addresses are fit for copying. Truly replicable "smart money" must demonstrate stable, long-term profitability across key metrics like win rate, max drawdown, and strategy consistency. PPP aims to solve this by building a system that structures complex on-chain data into actionable strategies for users. It employs a dual AI-modeling and manual-review process to analyze addresses based on performance, risk, capital allocation, and more, filtering out偶然性盈利 to identify statistically reliable strategies. The platform categorizes these strategies into two main products: a "Strategy Square" featuring long-term, vetted strategies with strict criteria like a six-month minimum track record, and a "Trading Leaderboard" highlighting shorter-term, high-performing opportunities from the past 30 days. Both are presented with clear style descriptions (e.g., "high implied win rate, high volatility"). Currently accessible via a Telegram Bot, PPP offers features like one-click trading, address copying, and an AI address analysis tool. It uses a subscription model and a non-custodial wallet. A trial run by the author yielded significant short-term gains, though subsequent drawdowns highlighted the importance of risk management and adjusting copy parameters per strategy. PPP’s core value lies not just in copy-trading, but in compiling and structuring混沌的交易信号 into replicable strategies, reducing information asymmetry in prediction markets. While it can’t guarantee future profits, it provides a more systematic, higher-probability entry point for users navigating the uncertain but opportunity-rich landscape, especially during events like the World Cup.

Odaily星球日报4m ago

Interview with PPP: How the World Cup Ignited the Prediction Market, and How to Find "Replicable Smart Money"?

Odaily星球日报4m ago

Bitcoin at 59,000 Is Not the Bottom, One Last Drop Needed! Chain Data and Liquidity Analysis: Where is BTC's True Bottom?

Based on analysis by trader Mr. Beggar, Bitcoin's (BTC) recent low of $59k is likely not the final cycle bottom. He argues that while a bottom is near, a final downward movement is still probable to target liquidity below that level, making a deeper low healthier for a sustainable reversal. Mr. Beggar's framework combines on-chain data for long-term cycles and liquidity-based technical analysis for shorter-term trades. His "four deep bear buying models" include Cointime Price (market cost weighted by coin holding time) and AVIV (an enhanced MVRV indicator), which currently suggest prices are nearing cyclical bottom zones. While a PSIP (Percent Supply in Profit) signal has flashed below 50%, it alone is not considered definitive; typically, the first signal is not the final bottom. He presents three potential scenarios for the current market: 1) a direct drop from here, 2) an upward liquidity sweep (stop hunt) of the recent high near $67.3k before declining, and 3) a direct reversal without new lows. He heavily discounts the third scenario due to significant un-swept liquidity in the $59k-$62.3k range, suggesting the market must revisit these levels. Mr. Beggar shares that he used on-chain signals to identify potential cycle tops in late 2024/early 2025 and later established low-leverage BTC-denominated short positions. He emphasizes the importance of risk management and staying within one's expertise ("strike zone"), warning against investing in assets like AI/semiconductor stocks simply because they are rising.

marsbit33m ago

Bitcoin at 59,000 Is Not the Bottom, One Last Drop Needed! Chain Data and Liquidity Analysis: Where is BTC's True Bottom?

marsbit33m ago

From Signal Monitoring to Strategy Copy Trading: How PPP Lowers the Barrier to Trading on Polymarket?

From Signal Monitoring to Strategy Copy Trading: How PPP Lowers the Barrier to Polymarket Trading The surge in trading demand on prediction markets like Polymarket, especially during events like the World Cup, exposes a common challenge for novice users: emotional and impulsive trading due to a lack of stable strategies and reliable signals. Prediction Position Platform (PPP) addresses this by serving as a Telegram-based tool for strategy discovery and automated copy-trading on Polymarket. PPP offers a suite of features through a subscription model. Key functionalities include 24/7 market signal monitoring (tracking smart money movements and rapid probability shifts), an "AI Address Analysis" tool to evaluate trader performance metrics, and specialized sections like a "World Cup Zone" for quick access to related markets. Its core value lies in two curated lists: the "Strategy Square," which identifies addresses suitable for long-term tracking based on comprehensive metrics like returns, win rate, and drawdowns, and the "Trading Leaderboard," highlighting recently outperforming addresses for short-term opportunities. Users can manually analyze any address or set up automated copy-trading with customizable parameters like investment amount and stop-loss. After initiating copy-trades, users can manage all positions from a unified dashboard, adjusting parameters or stopping follows as needed, and review historical performance data. Crucially, PPP employs a non-custodial wallet model, meaning user funds remain in their own self-custodied wallets, enhancing security and trust. In summary, PPP aims to reduce the learning curve and trial-and-error cost for Polymarket users by aggregating signals, curating and analyzing profitable traders, and facilitating automated, yet manageable, copy-trading execution.

Odaily星球日报33m ago

From Signal Monitoring to Strategy Copy Trading: How PPP Lowers the Barrier to Trading on Polymarket?

Odaily星球日报33m ago

From the White-Haired Stock God to the Billion-Dollar Fund Titan: The Smart People Shorting NVIDIA Are Getting Rich Using the Same Framework

From "white-haired stock god" to billionaire fund manager, those profiting from shorting NVIDIA share a common framework. The article analyzes the critical bottlenecks in the AI hardware supply chain, which have become key investment focal points. The core argument is that the real constraint on the AI boom isn't software or algorithms, but fundamental physical infrastructure. The piece dissects nine major bottlenecks, organized around the lifecycle of an AI accelerator circuit board. *Before the Board*: The pre-manufacturing stage faces constraints in EDA tools, new materials (like GaN, SiC, InP) replacing silicon, and the critical, non-renewable supply of helium for semiconductor fabrication. *On the Board*: The primary bottlenecks are High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), essential for unleashing GPU power, and advanced packaging (e.g., CoWoS), required to integrate components. Both are in severe shortage. *Between Boards*: Chip-to-chip communication is hitting limits with copper, pushing photonics and optical interconnects (CPO) as the next-gen solution, with NVIDIA heavily investing in this area. *Around the Board*: Power delivery requires new materials (GaN/SiC) for efficient voltage conversion from 48V to sub-1V. High-density AI racks (120kW+) are forcing a shift from air to liquid cooling as the standard. *Beyond the Board*: The ultimate bottleneck is electricity. AI data centers consume power equivalent to mid-sized cities, and grid expansion lags far behind demand, causing project delays and a scramble for power contracts. Prominent investors like Leopold and "white-haired stock god" are heavily betting on these infrastructure bottlenecks. Leopold's fund, for instance, holds no NVIDIA stock but uses massive put options to short the semiconductor sector while going long on power and physical infrastructure. His thesis is that while chip competition may eventually erode margins, the scarcity of foundational elements like electricity is more persistent. The framework's validity is tied to the supply-demand gap. Major new capacity in HBM and photonics is scheduled for 2027-2028, but demand continues to outpace it. Experts like Intel's CEO suggest no relief before 2028. However, the article warns of a potential reversal around 2028-2029 if AI capex slows and new capacity floods the market, turning scarcity into oversupply. Until then, the imbalance persists.

链捕手1h ago

From the White-Haired Stock God to the Billion-Dollar Fund Titan: The Smart People Shorting NVIDIA Are Getting Rich Using the Same Framework

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片