加密市场行情突变,本轮暴跌因何而起?

深潮Published on 2024-07-25Last updated on 2024-07-25

抛开加密市场利好出尽的因素之外,美股暴跌、美联储降息仍有不确定性以及美总统候选人哈里斯从未对加密市场有过表态让市场蒙上一场阴影。

撰文:1912212.eth,Foresight News

以太坊现货 ETF 正式交易不过两天,市场便开始迎来大跌,有趣的是,以太坊在前段时间因利好而迎来的上涨,利好出尽之后的利空则使其跌幅远甚于 BTC 与 SOL。ETH 跌破 3200 美元,24 小时跌幅超 8%,以太坊生态代币迎来不小跌幅,比特币一度跌破 6.4 万美元,跌幅 3%,SOL 跌幅 2%。过去 1 小时全网爆仓 1.13 亿美元,其中多单爆仓 1.08 亿美元,空单爆仓 422.54 万美元。

CryproQuant 创始人兼 CEO Ki Young Ju 发文表示,Mt. Gox 向债权人还款后 Kraken 平台 BTC 现货交易对的交易量以及平台流入 / 流出量未出现范围外的异常,BTC 的下跌或由市场情绪导致,而不是真正的抛售导致的。

既然门头沟的抛售并未发生,到底哪些宏观负面因素在影响资金流动?

美股暴跌拖累全球风险资产

特斯拉及谷歌财报不及预期,触发投资者对 AI 泡沫的悲观情绪,拖累纳指和标普 500 大盘分别收跌 3.64% 和 2.31%,创 2022 年底以来的一年半最大单日跌幅,带崩美股股指全线熄火,道指大跌 500 点,小盘股指跌 2.1%,芯片股指跌 5.4%,中概股指跌近 2%。

科技巨头股总市值较十日前峰值缩水近 1.75 万亿美元。特斯拉收跌 12.33%,创 2020 年 9 月以来最大单日跌幅。英伟达跌 6.8%,Meta 跌超 5.6%,谷歌跌 5.04% 创 1 月底以来的半年最大跌幅,微软跌约 3.6%,亚马逊跌约 3%,苹果跌约 2.9%。

在美股等风险资产表现大跌眼镜之时,全球投资者避险情绪升温,作为流动性较强的加密资产,不可避免也受到波及影响,导致资金抽离引发下跌。

降息迫在眉睫,但仍需等待数据表现

加密风险资产受限于美联储利率影响明显。当美联储正式宣布降息之时,资金才会不断流出寻找更有收益的资产,从而推动包括股票、加密资产的价格上涨。

市场声音在呼吁尽快降息。

享有 FOMC 永久投票权、号称美联储三把手的前美国纽约联储主席杜德利今日就表示:我长期以来一直站在「更长时间维持利率高位」的阵营,我认为要控制通胀就必须把短期利率保持在当前或比当前更高的水平。但现在情况已经变了,所以我也改了主意。美联储应该降息,最好下周利率会议上就开始。

但目前市场普遍预估降息时间可能最早为 9 月,而不是提前。

今年上半年通胀态势和强劲就业数据使得联储更重视通胀风险,市场的降息预期也因此不断落空,进入下半年,伴随二次通胀风险的消褪与失业率的走高(4.1%),联储的风险管理姿态渐渐向“增长风险”倾斜。

目前即便想要在 9 月开始降息,仍有多个流程要走,且会议以前公布的经济数据也必须符合联储官员的预判,即通胀、就业和增长的走软,以对降息提供数据支持。

因此美联储立马降息仍有较大不确定性。

美总统候选人哈里斯对加密立场模糊

美国总统拜登在今日发表讲话宣布退出 2024 年总统竞选,并将专注于完成他任期内的总统职责。而哈里斯则正式成为川普的强劲对手。

虽然在预测市场 Polymarket 中,参与者预测川普赢得大选的概率为 62%,哈里斯的概率为 36%,但在路透社最近的民意调查中显示,哈里斯以微弱的优势(44%)领先于川普(42%)。

哈里斯还被 Bitcoin Magazine 首席执行官确认不会出席即将举办的比特币 2024 大会发表演讲。此外,相较于「懂王」的诸多加密观点,纵观哈里斯的过往动态,她目前为止从未对加密行业发表过评论,也从未对加密货币采取过官方立场。财务披露的数据显示,哈里斯和她丈夫也都没有涉足过加密领域。

唯一有间接联系的仅仅是在 2020 年的大选期间,哈里斯曾聘请 NBA 国王队的前首席技术官 Montoya,而 Montoya 曾使得国王队成为全球第一个接受比特币的球队,还推出过 NFT。Montoya 现任白宫总统助理,负责行程安排等,因此没有太大可能会其政策产生影响。

Related Reads

a16z Founder: In the Agent Era, What Truly Matters Has Changed

Marc Andreessen, co-founder of a16z, argues that the current AI boom is not an overnight success but the culmination of 80 years of research, now delivering practical results. He emphasizes that this era is defined by the convergence of four key capabilities: large language models (LLMs), reasoning, coding, and agents capable of recursive self-improvement. Andreessen describes the agent architecture—combining an LLM with a shell, file system, markdown, and cron/loop—as a fundamental shift beyond chatbots. This structure leverages existing software components, allowing agents to maintain state, introspect, and extend their own functionality. He predicts a move away from traditional GUI and browser-based interactions toward an "agent-first" world where software is primarily operated by bots, not humans, with people simply stating their goals. He draws parallels to the 2000 internet bubble but notes key differences: current AI infrastructure investments are led by cash-rich giants and quickly monetized. He highlights that scaling constraints involve not just GPUs but the entire chip ecosystem. Open source and edge inference are crucial for democratizing knowledge and enabling low-latency, cost-effective applications on local hardware. Finally, Andreessen identifies significant non-technical challenges: potential short-term cybersecurity crises, the need for "proof of human" identity solutions, financial infrastructure for agents, and institutional resistance from sectors like education and healthcare. He cautions that societal adoption will be slower than technological change.

marsbit5m ago

a16z Founder: In the Agent Era, What Truly Matters Has Changed

marsbit5m ago

The Code Was Fine, But It Was Still Hacked: What Is the 'DVN Configuration Vulnerability' Behind the Biggest Hack of 2026?

Title: Code Was Secure, Yet $293M Stolen: The 2026 DVN Configuration Breach Explained On April 18, 2026, Kelp DAO’s restaking protocol was exploited, losing 116,500 rsETH (worth $293M at the time) due to a configuration flaw—not a smart contract vulnerability. The attacker used a forged cross-chain message to drain funds via LayerZero’s bridge, then dispersed the stolen rsETH across Aave V3, Compound V3, and Euler to borrow real assets, ultimately escaping with $236M in WETH. The root cause was a critical misconfiguration in Kelp’s LayerZero V2 setup: the protocol used a 1-of-1 Decentralized Verifier Network (DVN) threshold, meaning only one node approval was needed to validate cross-chain messages. The attacker compromised that single node, allowing unauthorized minting of rsETH on Ethereum. This configuration choice—permitted by LayerZero but highly risky—left zero fault tolerance. In contrast, protocols like ApeChain using multi-node validation (e.g., 2-of-3 or 5-of-9) remained secure. This incident highlights a blind spot in DeFi security audits: tools like Slither and Mythril scan code for logic flaws but ignore configuration parameters. The 2022 Nomad hack ($190M loss) also stemmed from a config error, bringing total losses from such issues to ~$482M—rivaling private key breaches. The Kelp exploit underscores the need for standardized config audits and higher baseline security in cross-chain designs.

marsbit11m ago

The Code Was Fine, But It Was Still Hacked: What Is the 'DVN Configuration Vulnerability' Behind the Biggest Hack of 2026?

marsbit11m ago

The More Frequently They Are Updated, the More Similar Claude Code and Codex Become

OpenAI's recent release of GPT-5.4-Cyber demonstrates a striking convergence with Anthropic's Claude Mythos, reflecting a broader trend of product and strategic alignment between the two AI giants. This is particularly evident in their flagship coding assistants, Codex and Claude Code, which have evolved from distinct philosophies into increasingly similar tools. Initially, Codex emphasized speed and real-time interaction, acting like a fast, junior developer, while Claude Code focused on handling extreme complexity with methodical, large-context analysis. However, both have adopted near-identical solutions to core challenges, such as using isolated sub-tasks or agent teams to prevent context pollution during large-scale code modifications. Benchmark results show a tight race: Codex leads in terminal tasks, while Claude Code excels in complex software engineering benchmarks. Community feedback highlights nuanced differences; Claude Code is faster but can accumulate technical debt, whereas Codex is slower but more deliberate and autonomous. The open-source framework OpenClaw has accelerated this homogenization by standardizing workflows, eroding proprietary advantages. Ultimately, the competition has shifted from pure capability to ecosystem strategy, pricing, and user experience. As these tools become ubiquitous, the developer's role evolves toward higher-level problem definition and architectural thinking, beyond automated code generation.

marsbit12m ago

The More Frequently They Are Updated, the More Similar Claude Code and Codex Become

marsbit12m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片