尽管面临行业压力,印度仍维持高加密货币税率

币界网Published on 2024-07-23Last updated on 2024-07-23

币界网报道:

尽管行业领袖不断呼吁降低现行税率,但印度决定在2024/25财年维持其现有的加密货币税收法规。

财政部长Nirmala Sitharaman在周二提交的2024/25财年预算报告中证实了这一决定。

印度最新预算保持1%加密TDS

印度最新的预算报告是在临时预算保持加密货币交易1%的来源税(TDS)扣除率五个月后发布的,这是2022年4月制定的规则。

这一规定导致印度加密货币行业的交易量大幅下降。然后,它促使行业代表倡导将TDS税率降至0.01%,并对收益征收累进税。他们还呼吁有能力用收益抵消损失,以建立更公平的税收制度。

尽管有这些呼吁,但最近的预算报告表明,1%的TDS税率或对加密货币收入征收30%的统一所得税没有变化。此外,长期资本利得税从10%上调至12.5%,短期资本利得税则从15%上调至20%。

虽然这些变化对加密货币交易的影响仍不确定,但取消对所有投资者的天使税被视为一个积极的发展。此举可能会吸引更多的Web3初创公司,并发展印度的创业生态系统。

印度加密货币行业面临严格的现行政策

值得注意的是,鉴于政府对加密货币交易相关风险的多次警告,预计Sitharaman将维持目前的加密货币税率。

印度储备银行(RBI)历来反对加密货币。它在2018年禁止金融机构为加密货币行业提供服务,这一决定在2020年被最高法院推翻。

印度储备银行2024年5月的公告还重申了加密资产的投机性质,并批评去中心化金融(DeFi)是由投机而不是真正的经济交易驱动的。

尽管有严格的税收政策,印度加密货币行业仍然对未来的减税持乐观态度,这取决于其他国家推广加密货币或使其合法化等国际发展。

印度严格的税收制度并没有阻碍其在加密货币采用方面的全球领先地位,Chainalysis 2023年全球加密货币采用指数名列前茅就是明证。当地行业继续推动税收改革,希望未来有更有利的监管环境。

与此同时,最近的选举结果和加密货币交易所WazirX遭受的2.349亿美元黑客攻击可能将加密货币监管进一步推低了政府的优先事项清单。

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit3h ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片