PEXX 在种子轮融资为其创新型稳定币到法定货币支付平台筹集 450 万美元

深潮Published on 2024-07-18Last updated on 2024-07-18

PEXX 的支付平台让持有 Tether (USDT) 和 Circle (USDC) 稳定币的用户可以将数字资产直接转移到全球银行账户。

2024 年 7 月 9 日 - PEXX 今日宣布在融资中成功筹集了 450 万美元,它是一家专注于加密货币和区块链技术的先锋金融科技初创公司。这笔重大投资将推动公司创新型稳定币到法定货币支付平台的发展,有望彻底改变人们的货币资产跨境转移方式。

此次由web3领域早期风险投资机构EMO Capital进行战略投资的PEXX,此前曾由TNB Aura领投,全球早期风险投资公司 Antler跟投,Chainlink/Filecoin等加密项目早期风险投资人共同参与,这表明投资者对 PEXX 的愿景和潜力充满信心。 

PEXX 的支付平台让持有 Tether (USDT) 和 Circle (USDC) 稳定币的用户可以将数字资产直接转移到全球银行账户。此平台让任意个人和企业能够轻松完成货币资产跨境转移,而无需中介机构或银行账户。

“我们很高兴获得我们投资者的信任获得此次融资,这将让我们能够进一步开发 PEXX 稳定币到法定货币的支付平台,”PEXX 创始人兼首席执行官 Marcus Lim 如是说,“稳定币的使用和需求呈快速增长态势,稳定币的普及使用趋势已经愈发明确,以 USDT 和 USDC 为代表的加密货币直接兑换到银行账户的现实需求必将迎来持续的增长。”

这笔资金将用于激励 PEXX 的工程和产品团队,以及扩大其营销和业务拓展力度,首先从东南亚开始。

战投型投资机构 EMO Capital 除了提供本轮资金支持之外,还将为 PEXX团队在 Web3 营销策略、品牌建设等方面提供持续支持,其务实高效的投后支持团队将为PEXX团队在用户增长,业务拓展,品牌建设,合规方案,后续融资,战略并购等方面发挥关键作用。 

EMO Capital 联合创始人 Angelina Tu 表示:“许多支付机构正在努力将传统互联网用户带入 加密领域,但PEXX团队为‘加密世界’的用户在‘现实世界’的支付和消费提供了最佳的解决方案,搭建了一座合规、受尊重和受保护的桥梁。这与EMO本阶段的关注重点高度契合,我们给予 PEXX 坚定的支持。”

TNB Aura 创始合伙人 Vicknesh R Pillay 表示:“PEXX 解决了 B2B 跨境 Web3 支付领域的关键需求。有 Marcus 掌管团队,我们很高兴能够为他们改变金融支付格局的探索之旅提供支持。”

Antler 联合创始人兼管理合伙人 Jussi Salovaara 表示:“我们很高兴为 PEXX 提供支持,因为他们构建了一个具有变革意义的支付平台,将消除稳定币与传统银行之间的代沟。这种简化跨境支付的方法与我们培育创新型金融科技解决方案的愿景完全一致。”

PEXX 在 2024 年 5 月获得了 AUSTRAC 许可证,确保其遵守政府最高监管标准要求,让 PEXX 能够作为独立的汇款交易服务商和数字货币转账服务提供商来开展业务。这一成就凸显了 PEXX 恪守严格遵守规定、采取健全的安全措施,以及建立客户信任的承诺。

PEXX 提供无缝的支付解决方案,让用户和企业可以将稳定币(USDT 和 USDC)兑换成 16 种不同的法定货币。PEXX 支持直接转账到银行账户,将简化加密货币到法定货币的兑换流程,让用户可以在几分钟内将资金汇入指定银行账户,而不是像传统银行解决方案那样需要花费几天时间。 

PEXX 简介:

PEXX 的开创性稳定币跨境支付平台将简化全球资金转移。通过提供安全、快捷且经济高效的解决方案,PEXX 让用户和企业能够将 USDT 和 USDC 等稳定币兑换成 16 种法定货币,直接汇入银行账户。PEXX 的创新型支付平台将消除传统金融与加密货币之间的孤岛现状,支持实现流畅、高效的全球资金转移。

如需了解更多信息,请访问 linktr.ee/pexxme 或联系下述媒体关系团队。 

媒体垂询,请联系: 

PEXX 营销团队

PEXX Technology Pte Ltd

marketing@pexx.com 

如需帮助,请随时联系我们的社区经理:https://t.me/PEXXOfficial 

Related Reads

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

"Tokenizing Real Estate: Rights, Risks, and the Path to Liquidity" While tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) gains traction, real estate presents unique complexities. Beyond technical token issuance, critical challenges remain: enforcing legal rights, managing the underlying physical asset, and creating genuine secondary market liquidity. This article explores these issues through OneAsset, a Dubai-based commercial real estate (CRE) tokenization platform. OneAsset moves away from simply offering asset fragmentation. Instead, it focuses on institutional-grade infrastructure, prioritizing asset quality, legal enforceability, and operational fundamentals. Each property is held in an independent, single-asset vault, backed by a legally separate Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for bankruptcy remoteness. Investors acquire tokens representing the economic rights to a specific property, with precise legal claims defined by the underlying SPV structure. OneAsset emphasizes that tokenization cannot transform a poor-quality asset. Its initial focus is on institutional investors and quality Dubai-based CRE, selected for stable tenant cash flows and a clear regulatory environment. The platform integrates compliance by design, aiming to embed investor qualification and transfer rules directly into the token architecture. A core insight is that asset fragmentation does not automatically create liquidity. True liquidity depends on the asset's inherent quality—its location, cash flow, and valuation—as well as sufficient buyer demand. The goal is not just tradability, but making real estate rights more easily priced, verified, and reallocated. Looking ahead, the article discusses the potential for "AiFi" (AI-powered finance). For AI agents to autonomously allocate capital, investment assets like real estate tokens must become truly "machine-readable." This requires a high degree of standardization in legal rights, valuations, cash flows, and compliance data—a direction OneAsset is pursuing through its structured data reporting. In conclusion, real estate tokenization is shifting from a technology narrative to a focus on asset fundamentals. Blockchain can enhance efficiency and programmability, but it cannot replace sound underwriting, property management, or legal execution. The real work begins after the asset is on-chain.

marsbit24m ago

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

marsbit24m ago

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

After more than two decades, a legal parallel has emerged. In 1998, major U.S. tobacco companies settled for $206 billion, leading to strict advertising bans and warning labels that significantly reduced smoking rates. On August 26, 2026, Meta reached a landmark settlement with U.S. attorneys general, agreeing to pay up to approximately $18 billion and implement mandatory changes to Facebook and Instagram. This historic settlement, one of the largest against a tech company, stems from allegations that Meta deliberately designed addictive features like infinite scroll and push notifications, harming youth mental health and violating child privacy laws. Facing a potential $1.4 trillion lawsuit and a series of unfavorable jury verdicts, Meta chose to settle on the eighth day of trial to avoid a catastrophic ruling. The core of the agreement is not just the financial penalty, which Meta will pay over 10 years, but a series of strict, 10-year product mandates for young users. These include a hard two-hour daily time limit (combined across apps), a default "nighttime block" from midnight to 6 AM, restricted notifications during school hours, hidden "like" counts, an optional non-algorithmic feed, and stronger age verification. An independent auditor will monitor compliance. Crucially, roughly 30% ($5.3 billion) of Meta's payment is contingent on YouTube and TikTok adopting similar measures and paying around $5 billion each. This move aims to create an industry-wide standard and prevent Meta from being competitively disadvantaged. The settlement is being likened to Big Tobacco's "tobacco moment." By legally framing addictive algorithm design as a "public nuisance," it sets a powerful precedent. Nearly 3,000 similar cases are pending against other social media giants, signaling a fundamental shift in regulatory pressure. The era where platforms could deny the addictive impact of their designs on children is effectively over.

marsbit30m ago

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片