Coinbase、Ripple和另一家加密货币公司的高管现在向共和党权力掮客陈述他们的观点:报告

币界网Published on 2024-07-17Last updated on 2024-07-17

币界网报道:

据报道,美国顶级加密货币公司本周将派代表团参加密尔沃基举行的共和党全国代表大会。

Politico报道称,Coinbase、Ripple和风险投资巨头Andreessen Horowitz的官员计划参加此次活动,以促进支持加密货币的立法和监管议程。

据报道,这些公司还计划派代表参加下个月在芝加哥举行的民主党全国代表大会。

众议员达斯蒂·约翰逊(南达科他州共和党人)告诉政治报》,加密货币“显然是越来越多人感兴趣的问题”

随着2024年总统竞选的升温,共和党及其推定提名人唐纳德·特朗普越来越多地争取数字资产投票。

本月早些时候,共和党全国委员会发布了一个新的党纲,承诺支持加密货币,反对创建中央银行数字货币(CBDC)。

前总统特朗普在周末的一次暗杀企图中幸存下来,他将自己定位为对加密货币友好的候选人,尽管此前曾将数字资产描述为“一场即将发生的灾难”

他的2024年总统竞选活动也开始接受加密货币捐款,6月从Gemini加密货币交易所联合创始人Tyler和Cameron Winklevoss那里收到了价值200万美元的比特币(BTC)。

今年5月,陪审团裁定特朗普犯有34项重罪,涉及在2016年总统大选前伪造商业记录。

不要错过任何一个节拍-订阅以直接将电子邮件提醒发送到您的收件箱查看价格行动在X、Facebook和Telegram上关注我们冲浪每日Hodl Mix

生成的图像:Midjourney

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit2h ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片