这轮DeFi项目UNI和CRV等能否破前高?|疑问解答

金色财经Published on 2024-07-08Last updated on 2024-07-08

1. Base链的Degen是什么?

Base链的Degen我前面曾经写过一篇文章专门介绍。它原本只是Base链上的一个MEME币,但后来Farcaster上面越来越多的应用开始用它作为消费代币,并且有团队专门用Degen为原生代币开发了基于Base链的第三层网络。

Degen可能未必是Base链上涨幅最大的MEME币,也未必是Base链上现在最热门的MEME币,但它大概率是Base链上现在使用得最广的MEME币。

2. SSV如何?

这个币我在以前的文章中聊过,它也算质押这一大类的项目吧。

质押类项目的商业模式都非常清晰,风险收益也比较容易分析,项目的天花板在哪里也比较容易看得到。

这类项目代币的估值是否合理,或者是否超过了项目的合理范围是很容易估算出来的。这样的项目一旦价格过于离谱很容易被套现、砸盘,所以币价的涨幅很容易顶到天花板。

对这样的项目它们的代币除了短暂的炒作可能会导致价格飙高以外,一旦热潮过后,它们代币的走势大概率就是那种稳步前进的状况,或许会比比特币、以太坊稍微好点,也或许还比不上。

所以这类代币还是更符合大机构的口味、适合大资金参与,对散户而言意义一般。

对我自己参与的质押类项目比如EigenLayer、Ether.Fi等我也是这个看法,要不是这些项目有薅羊毛的机会,我大概率也不会太关注它们。

3. 这轮DeFi表现太差了,UNI、SUSHI、CRV之类的还有破前高的机会吗?

在这轮走势中,经典DeFi项目的代币确实很不尽如人意,不过一些次新的项目比如Pendle表现还是不错的。

Oh2UioR8kFhjy45qNB2dOZDfSCbJvQtEFA1DMLve.png

不过总体而言,我还是认为DeFi项目代币的价格被压抑了。

DeFi项目是目前所有的细分领域中唯一能实现正营收的细分领域。但可能因为监管方面的障碍,这些项目的营收很难被正大光明地赋能到代币,所以它们代币的价格被严重限制了。

这个问题不解决,整个DeFi生态的代币其上涨空间恐怕都有限。

至于说它们能不能在接下来的牛市中破前高,我就猜不到了。

4. 在司法、财务、合同、档案等方面太多资料需要保存20年以上,去中心化存储在这些领域有多大发展空间?

我认为去中心化存储(尤其是永久存储)有很大的空间。但这个问题中提到的司法、财务、合同等这些材料是否能用到现在的永久存储(比如Arweave),技术上肯定是可以,但在现阶段,使用的障碍恐怕主要还是在成本和操作门槛。

我相信未来类似应用的成本和使用门槛降到足够低时,这个应用一定会爆发。

5. PEPE会不会成为第二个狗狗币或者屎币?

我觉得PEPE想成为第二个屎币可能性不大,因为它缺乏一个强有力的团队建设生态。能不能成为狗狗币那就要看有没有像马斯克这样的人不停地关注它。

如果没有这些条件,PEPE恐怕只能是被蹭热点的项目:大家想起来的时候就蹭一波,忘掉的时候就晾一边。

Related Reads

Hubei State-Owned Assets Achieve the Largest Return in History

After years of anticipation, Yangtze Memory Holdings Co., Ltd. (YMTC) has filed for an IPO on Shanghai's STAR Market, seeking to raise 33 billion yuan—the largest offering in the board's history. This move follows the recent listing of its peer, ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), which reached a market valuation exceeding 4 trillion yuan. Dubbed the "twin stars of domestic memory," both companies, founded in 2016 in Hefei and Wuhan respectively, symbolize China's push for semiconductor self-sufficiency. YMTC's journey began with its predecessor, Wuhan Xinxin, established in 2006. Backed by substantial state investment from Hubei and Wuhan, it evolved into a national memory base. The company achieved key technological breakthroughs, and now ranks as the world's third-largest and China's top NAND Flash manufacturer by sales. Its recent financials are strong, with Q1 2026 revenue of 47.04 billion yuan and net profit of 33.38 billion yuan. Post-IPO, its market value is widely expected to surpass 1 trillion yuan. The potential windfall highlights the success of long-term, patient capital from Hubei's state-owned entities. Key shareholders like Hubei Changsheng, Xintech, and government-backed funds have supported YMTC through years of development. Their collective stake could be worth hundreds of billions after the listing. This model mirrors other successes in Wuhan, such as Huagong Tech, where local state investment during a low point later yielded massive returns. The story reflects a broader national trend of regional transformation through strategic, high-tech investments. Hefei's bet on CXMT, now worth over 3.7 trillion yuan, propelled the city's A-share market cap to 4th nationally, showcasing how a major firm can reshape an entire local industry ecosystem. Similarly, Wuhan's photoelectronics cluster, now worth over 850 billion yuan, aims to become a world-class hub. The takeaway is clear: in the reshuffling of Chinese cities, patient, courageous state investment in core technologies—from memory chips to advanced manufacturing—is proving to be a decisive factor, turning long-term visions into economic reality.

marsbit12m ago

Hubei State-Owned Assets Achieve the Largest Return in History

marsbit12m ago

The Myth of AI Investment Collapses

"The AI Investment Myth Bursts: The Swift Collapse of a $45 Billion Fund The high-flying hedge fund Situational Awareness (SA), founded by 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner, neared total collapse in late July. Once a Wall Street darling, the fund saw its assets under management rocket from $1.5 billion to $45 billion in under a year, driven by a massively leveraged bet on the AI boom. Its core strategy was a 'Texas hedge'—simultaneously buying stocks seen as AI beneficiaries (like chipmakers) and shorting those deemed AI victims (like certain software firms). In reality, both sides of this trade were dependent on unbroken market confidence in AI. This strategy generated staggering returns, peaking at 439% year-to-date. However, it concealed extreme concentration, high leverage (reportedly 3-to-1), and liquidity risks from illiquid private holdings like Anthropic. When semiconductor stocks corrected sharply in late July, SA's long positions plummeted. Simultaneously, its short bets failed as 'AI victim' stocks rose, causing losses on both sides. The fund faced immediate, massive margin calls. With minutes to spare before a forced liquidation by its prime brokers, SA sold its entire public market portfolio at a discount to Citadel on July 30, narrowly avoiding a market-wide cascade. The fund's value crashed from $45 billion to roughly $10 billion (excluding its remaining Anthropic stake). The episode exposes the systemic risks embedded in the frenzied, highly leveraged chase for AI returns. It serves as a stark reminder of the old Wall Street adage: markets can stay irrational longer than investors can stay solvent. The crisis shifts focus from Aschenbrenner's AI predictions to whether capital markets will continue ignoring such dangerous concentration and leverage in pursuit of the next 'sure thing' narrative."

marsbit13m ago

The Myth of AI Investment Collapses

marsbit13m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片