这轮DeFi项目UNI和CRV等能否破前高?

金色财经Published on 2024-07-08Last updated on 2024-07-08

来源:道说区块链

1. Base链的Degen是什么?

Base链的Degen我前面曾经写过一篇文章专门介绍。它原本只是Base链上的一个MEME币,但后来Farcaster上面越来越多的应用开始用它作为消费代币,并且有团队专门用Degen为原生代币开发了基于Base链的第三层网络。

Degen可能未必是Base链上涨幅最大的MEME币,也未必是Base链上现在最热门的MEME币,但它大概率是Base链上现在使用得最广的MEME币。

2. SSV如何?

这个币我在以前的文章中聊过,它也算质押这一大类的项目吧。

质押类项目的商业模式都非常清晰,风险收益也比较容易分析,项目的天花板在哪里也比较容易看得到。

这类项目代币的估值是否合理,或者是否超过了项目的合理范围是很容易估算出来的。这样的项目一旦价格过于离谱很容易被套现、砸盘,所以币价的涨幅很容易顶到天花板。

对这样的项目它们的代币除了短暂的炒作可能会导致价格飙高以外,一旦热潮过后,它们代币的走势大概率就是那种稳步前进的状况,或许会比比特币、以太坊稍微好点,也或许还比不上。

所以这类代币还是更符合大机构的口味、适合大资金参与,对散户而言意义一般。

对我自己参与的质押类项目比如EigenLayer、Ether.Fi等我也是这个看法,要不是这些项目有薅羊毛的机会,我大概率也不会太关注它们。

3. 这轮DeFi表现太差了,UNI、SUSHI、CRV之类的还有破前高的机会吗?

在这轮走势中,经典DeFi项目的代币确实很不尽如人意,不过一些次新的项目比如Pendle表现还是不错的。

不过总体而言,我还是认为DeFi项目代币的价格被压抑了。

DeFi项目是目前所有的细分领域中唯一能实现正营收的细分领域。但可能因为监管方面的障碍,这些项目的营收很难被正大光明地赋能到代币,所以它们代币的价格被严重限制了。

这个问题不解决,整个DeFi生态的代币其上涨空间恐怕都有限。

至于说它们能不能在接下来的牛市中破前高,我就猜不到了。

4. 在司法、财务、合同、档案等方面太多资料需要保存20年以上,去中心化存储在这些领域有多大发展空间?

我认为去中心化存储(尤其是永久存储)有很大的空间。但这个问题中提到的司法、财务、合同等这些材料是否能用到现在的永久存储(比如Arweave),技术上肯定是可以,但在现阶段,使用的障碍恐怕主要还是在成本和操作门槛。

我相信未来类似应用的成本和使用门槛降到足够低时,这个应用一定会爆发。

5. PEPE会不会成为第二个狗狗币或者屎币?

我觉得PEPE想成为第二个屎币可能性不大,因为它缺乏一个强有力的团队建设生态。能不能成为狗狗币那就要看有没有像马斯克这样的人不停地关注它。

如果没有这些条件,PEPE恐怕只能是被蹭热点的项目:大家想起来的时候就蹭一波,忘掉的时候就晾一边。

Related Reads

The Real Battlefield of AI Lies in the 'Dark Forest'

The article "AI's Real Battlefield is in the 'Dark Forest'" discusses the shifting dynamics in the global AI landscape, contrasting the strategic directions of Chinese and U.S. AI developers. Chinese companies like Alibaba (with its "HappyHorse" video model), ByteDance (Seedance 2.0), and Kuaishou (Kling 3.0) have taken the lead in text-to-video generation, surpassing OpenAI’s now-discontinued Sora. These models are deeply integrated into their parent companies’ content ecosystems (e.g., Douyin, Kuaishou), serving to reduce content creation costs and enhance user engagement rather than operating as standalone profit centers. In contrast, U.S. firms are pivoting toward high-stakes enterprise and security applications. Anthropic’s Claude Mythos model demonstrates advanced capabilities in autonomously discovering and exploiting software vulnerabilities, prompting concern at the highest levels of U.S. financial and governmental institutions. OpenAI responded with its own GPT-5.4-Cyber, signaling a strategic shift from consumer-facing products to enterprise-grade tools focused on cybersecurity and programming. The divergence is attributed to fundamental differences in resources and market structures. U.S. companies, backed by vast computational resources (e.g., Amazon and Google supply Anthropic with substantial funding and TPU access), can pursue deep, specialized R&D in high-value B2B sectors. Chinese firms, facing significant compute power constraints and a less mature enterprise SaaS market, have found success by leveraging their massive consumer platforms and optimizing for cost-efficiency. The article warns that the AI race is entering a "dark forest" phase—a reference to competitive dynamics where cybersecurity capabilities could determine digital sovereignty. While Chinese models like Zhipu AI’s GLM-5.1 show promise in narrowing the gap in coding proficiency, the author stresses that achieving parity in security-critical AI will require asymmetric strategies, including greater investment in coding models, adaptation to domestic hardware, and exploring international markets in the Global South.

marsbit1h ago

The Real Battlefield of AI Lies in the 'Dark Forest'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片