Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-06-03Last updated on 2024-06-03

Abstract

新瓶装旧酒，名人效应老套路。

原文作者：深潮 TechFlow

大玩家又回来了。

在沉寂了半个月后，做多游戏驿站股票一战成名的 Roaring Kitty今天在推特上发布一张 UNO 卡牌游戏中的「翻转牌」。

Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

不管这条推文到底有何暗示 or 明示，由于 Roaring Kitty 个人形象已经和 Wall Street Bets Themed 这一概念深度绑定，此条推文一出，游戏驿站股票$GME 的 Solana 链同名代币$GME 短时上涨接近 300% ，而在 ETH 链的$GME 更是飙升近 800% 。

Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

新瓶装旧酒，名人效应老套路？

在上个月 Roaring Kitty 时隔三年首次发推，随之引发$GME 和同名代币大爆涨，在此期间 Roaring Kitty 不断地在推特发布各种不同的影视片段。

即使是此般看上去不知所云的表达却同样引起人们的 fomo，Roaring Kitty 在推特发出的每一条短片几乎都有同名的 memecoin 跟风炒作。

对于 Roaring Kitty 本人来说或许只是一时兴起地表达，但对于韭菜们来说却不能不在意，毕竟每条推文都可能是未经发掘的金矿。

与名人自身概念强关联的标的拉盘，这种事看着离谱，但对币圈玩家来说，早已见证了市场一波又一波的爱屋及乌。

马斯克通过推文多次表达对$DOGE 的喜爱之后，$DOGE 的价格貌似就与他的一言一行强绑定了。

在 21 年马斯克每一次提到 Dogecoin，随之而来的就是$DOGE 巨大的泵，屡次不爽。此般造富效应的影响力像雪球一样越滚越大，甚至到后来对于马斯克推文的监控已经到了卷毫秒级。

时至今日，马斯克依然是币圈的顶流，市场上仍有无数双眼睛紧盯他的每一条推特，期待能从某条推文中出现财富密码。

Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

之前炒作的“创始人与小动物”概念也是如此，V神的猫、Solana 创始人 Toly 的龙、Ploygon 创始人 Sandeep 的宠物象等等......

致使人们的趋之若鹜的必然不是可爱的小动物本身，宠物板块炒作的本质还是名人影响力的下沉。

名人自身的影响力吸引人们对标的 meme 炒作的目光，再加之部分名人自身也主动为 meme“带货”，就像油罐上的火星，遇之即燃。

当然作为影响力本身的名人们自是深谙其道，上周爆火的$Jenner 币原型Caitlyn Jenner蹭热点的速度也是相当快：

Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

哪些 GME 概念 Meme 值得关注？

同名股票代币

$GME

两个游戏驿站股票的同名代币$GME 是当前最火标的：

Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

$AMC

和$GME 的叙事类似，$AMC 也是美股$AMC 的同名代币，作为北美最大影院的$AMC 也是北美散户热衷炒作的标的，从价格表现看$AMC 也明显受到 Roaring Kitty 的推文影响，拉升接近 700% 后回落。

Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

人物同名代币

$Kitty是 Roaring Kitty 的同名代币，在 5 月 Roaring Kitty 时隔三年首次发推后旋即暴涨，今天也随着 Roaring Kitty 的新动态拉升将近 1000% 后回落。

Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

Wall Street Bets 概念

$WSB 与$WSM

还有直指华尔街赌注主题的$WSB 与$WSM

Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

Roaring Kitty再复出？哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

可见现在市场的需求越来越简单粗暴了，注意力经济的财富效应一次又一次地碾压纯基本面党，大家都需要自己的投入掷地有声，一则消息就能直接拉盘那是再好不过，所以现在 Roaring Kitty 的一张图片就能轻松推动上亿美元的资金流动。

马斯克的狗，V神的猫，Kitty 的 GME，其实一切都没变过......

注意力就像名人手中的令旗，只需伸手轻轻一挥，散户们说是召之即来也不为过。

只是注意力也有保质期，市场更愿意为不断涌现的新热点买单，即便这个新热点只是换了张皮的老故事。

Roaring Kitty 这次“复出”是否只是他的一时兴起还仍未可知，但可以确定的是加密市场永远不缺新鲜的热点和甘愿为热点买单的拥趸。

原文链接

Related Reads

Without It, There Would Be No ImageNet... Now It's Gone

Amazon is shutting down its crowdsourcing platform, Mechanical Turk (MTurk), on September 30th, ending a 21-year run. Launched in 2005, MTurk connected businesses with a global online workforce to perform small, repetitive tasks—known as Human Intelligence Tasks (HITs)—that were easy for humans but difficult for computers at the time. At its peak, it hosted over 500,000 workers worldwide. MTurk played a pivotal, though often unseen, role in the rise of modern AI. Its most famous contribution was to the creation of the ImageNet dataset. In the late 2000s, researcher Fei-Fei Li and her team faced the monumental challenge of manually sorting and labeling millions of internet images to build a large-scale visual database for training AI. They turned to MTurk, distributing the work to nearly 50,000 workers from 167 countries. This "human-in-the-loop" effort made the massive ImageNet project feasible. ImageNet, in turn, became the foundational benchmark for the 2012 ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. The victory of Geoffrey Hinton and his students' deep convolutional neural network, AlexNet, on this dataset dramatically demonstrated the power of deep learning, catalyzing the AI revolution that followed. Now, MTurk is closing. The platform has declined as the very AI it helped build has become capable of automating the simple tasks it once provided. Furthermore, the AI industry's data needs have evolved, shifting towards more specialized expertise for model tuning and evaluation, served by newer platforms. Ironically, some studies suggest MTurk workers themselves began using AI tools like ChatGPT to complete tasks, adding a layer of automation to the "artificial artificial intelligence" service. The shutdown marks the end of an era where human effort, distributed globally via the internet, laid the crucial groundwork for the intelligent machines of today.

marsbit13m ago

Without It, There Would Be No ImageNet... Now It's Gone

marsbit13m ago

Bill Gates' Latest Long-Form Article: The Real Trouble with AI is That We Aren't Ready

Bill Gates' latest essay, "The turbulent AI era is here. The choices we make now are critical," warns that society is unprepared for the profound social and economic transition AI will bring. While optimistic about AI's long-term potential in healthcare, education, and other fields, Gates focuses on the "transition period" over the next 10-20 years. He argues this transition differs from past technological shifts like the Industrial Revolution because AI automates cognitive labor itself, potentially reducing the total number of future jobs. Risks like enhanced cyber-attacks and social disruption are already emerging, not distant future threats. A key concern is "low-cost intelligence substitution," where AI performs defined tasks cheaper than humans, gradually thinning workforces. Gates introduces the concept of "Human Reserved" jobs—roles like nursing or delivering serious medical news—where human judgment and empathy should remain central, even if AI is technically capable. To manage the transition, he calls for new governance, stronger social safety nets, retraining, and international cooperation, especially between the US and China. Crucially, he proposes taxing AI usage and robots to slow displacement and fund social programs. The core dilemma Gates presents is that AI could become humanity's "greatest equalizer" or its "worst source of injustice," depending on whether its immense productivity gains are broadly shared or concentrate wealth and power. The fundamental challenge is not just advancing the technology, but adapting our social and economic systems to it.

marsbit28m ago

Bill Gates' Latest Long-Form Article: The Real Trouble with AI is That We Aren't Ready

marsbit28m ago

Just Now, Anthropic Unveils Physical MCP: Claude Begins Controlling the Real World

Anthropic has announced the Model Hardware Standard (MHS), a new standard enabling AI agents like Claude to safely control physical devices. Building on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), MHS standardizes communication between AI agents and hardware such as microscopes, robotic arms, and lasers, marking a significant step for AI from the digital into the physical world. Developed in collaboration with HHMI Janelia Research Campus, MHS uses standardized drivers to translate basic commands (e.g., read, write) into a format any programmable device can understand. This drastically reduces integration time from weeks to hours or minutes and allows agents to discover and operate new devices using natural language tags that describe machine properties and safety limits. Agents can control devices via MCP, command-line interfaces, or APIs. They can sequence operations, monitor results, adjust parameters in real-time, and generate deterministic scripts for long-running tasks. Early tests show Claude interacting with hardware exploratively, like a scientist, learning to calibrate a laser and scripting the process. Early adopters and partners include AWS, Automata, Danaher, Doosan Robotics, and Tecan, who are integrating MHS support into their platforms. While promising, challenges remain: Claude's physical reasoning is limited, requiring expert oversight, and MHS currently only works with programmable hardware. Anthropic plans further refinements and broader device support before open-sourcing the standard.

marsbit1h ago

Just Now, Anthropic Unveils Physical MCP: Claude Begins Controlling the Real World

marsbit1h ago

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

**Title: The Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate Over Any 4-Year Holding Period** This article analyzes which major, freely-tradable assets have historically never produced a nominal loss over any rolling 4-year holding window. It concludes that only two distinct categories achieve this: ultra-low-risk contractual assets and Bitcoin. Among traditional risk assets, none maintain a perfect 4-year record. The S&P 500 had negative 4-year periods (e.g., 1929-1932: -64.8%). The Nasdaq 100 fell roughly 60% from 2000-2003. Gold saw a ~47.7% loss from 1981-1984. US real estate declined about 23.3% from 2007-2010. Even long-term US Treasury bonds (e.g., 2021-2024: -19.8%) and corporate bonds can produce 4-year losses due to interest rate and market price risks. In contrast, the first category achieving 100% nominal success includes assets like rolling 3-month US Treasury Bills, 4-year certificates of deposit (CDs), and US Treasuries held to maturity within 4 years. Their "guarantee" stems from contractual obligations and credit backing (e.g., FDIC insurance, US sovereign promise), not price appreciation. The sole exception in the high-risk category is Bitcoin. Analysis of daily data from 2010-2026 across 4,419 rolling 4-year windows shows a 100% positive return rate. The worst 4-year period (April 2021 to April 2025) still yielded a +32.6% total return (~7.3% CAGR). This record is unique because Bitcoin has no issuer, promises no cash flows, and has endured severe drawdowns (70-90%), yet its market price has always recovered within a 4-year span. The key distinction is the source of the "100%": contractual assets offer known, low nominal returns, while Bitcoin's record stems purely from historical price appreciation despite extreme volatility. The article suggests that for Bitcoin, the ability to hold for 4+ years is more critical than active trading strategies.

marsbit1h ago

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

marsbit1h ago

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

This article details the dramatic rise and near-collapse of a hedge fund built by Leopold Aschenbrenner, a 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher. The fund, named Situational Awareness, amassed $45 billion in assets within two years. Its explosive growth stemmed from Aschenbrenner's influential 165-page manifesto predicting AGI's arrival by 2027 and his high-profile Silicon Valley connections. The fund employed an extremely aggressive strategy: high concentration and 400% leverage to bet long on AI infrastructure stocks while shorting legacy software firms. In July, this structure backfired when both sides of the trade reversed simultaneously—AI stocks plunged while shorted stocks rallied—triggering massive losses that nearly wiped out all equity. Major player Jane Street reportedly lost billions. The fund's leveraged public portfolio was ultimately sold at a discount to Citadel. The SEC is now investigating banks like Goldman Sachs for their role in facilitating the fund's high-leverage trades. The article compares this to past blow-ups like Archegos, highlighting systemic failures in risk management where the pursuit of short-term profits overrode due diligence. It questions whether such risky leverage concentrated in the AI sector, currently at record highs, poses a broader systemic threat. Ironically, Aschenbrenner, who studied AI safety at OpenAI, designed a fund structure prone to uncontrolled failure. Days after the crisis, he reportedly raised another $400 million for new investments.

marsbit1h ago

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片