联创损失近千万美元,Ronin又被盗了?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-02-23Last updated on 2024-02-23

Abstract

Ronin社区传出疑似被盗消息,带动RON币价短时下跌超10%

2 月 23 日上午,Web3 安全团队 Ancilia.nc 在社交媒体表示,监测到价值超过 3000 ETH 的 RON 被短时间内从 Ronin 桥中提取并存入 Tornado。疑似黑客地址的关联钱包(0x 73、0x 39、0x a 4)在 Tornado 预存了 0.1 ETH,并在相同时间内提取总计 3250 枚 ETH。

Ronin 又被盗了?社区的反应更多是不敢相信,「我刚刚开始看好他」,还有人调侃「那是不是可以趁低价买入,他们应该不会遭受第三次攻击了」。

联创损失近千万美元,Ronin又被盗了?

消息发酵后,RON 从 3.16 美元的位置断崖式下跌, 10 分钟内下跌至 2.74 美元,跌幅超 13% 。

联创损失近千万美元,Ronin又被盗了?

左图源@WazzCrypto

被盗鲸鱼地址是 Axie Infinity 联创

二十分钟后,Ronin 联合创始人 Psycheout 在该条推特下回复表示,Ronin 和跨链桥都没有问题,这只是一个鲸鱼钱包被盗,并通过 Tornado Cash 混走。「Ronin 桥拥有很高的安全性,经过了多次审核,当监测到有大量资产撤走时就会暂停提取」。

Psycheout 还继续追加评论,要求 Ancilia 团队删除推文。

联创损失近千万美元,Ronin又被盗了?

但令社区没想到的是,这位被盗的鲸鱼竟是 Axie Infinity 和 Ronin Network 的联合创始人 Jihoz。

在社区的被盗疑问发出一小时后,Jihoz 发布了一条推文,表示其两个个人地址遭到安全攻击。Jihoz 强调,此次攻击仅限于其个人账户,与 Ronin 链的验证或运营活动无关。同时,泄露的密钥与 Sky Mavis 的运营也没有任何联系。「我想向大家保证,我们对所有链上相关活动都采取了严格的安全措施」。

Pixels 创始人 Luke Barwikowski 和 Ronin 联创 Psycheout,以及 Ronin 社区成员都在 Jihoz 的动态下表示了安慰。此次「被盗乌龙」宣告结束,截止撰稿时,RON 已经回升至 3 美元附近,短时跌幅收窄至 5% 。

联创损失近千万美元,Ronin又被盗了?

「被盗 PTSD」, 2 年前的 6 亿阴影

其实私钥被盗是常发生的事情, 300 万 RON 的价值体量也不算太大,只占流通量的 0.1% 。上个月,Ripple 陷入被盗 2.13 亿枚 XRP (约合 1.12 亿美元)」危机时,XRP 短时跌近 4% ,而此次 Ronin 事件中的流失资产价值在 1000 万美元左右,却在 10 分钟内引起了 13% 的跌幅?这样的敏感和恐慌情绪很大程度上是源于 2 年前 Ronin 被盗 6 亿的阴影。

2022 年 3 月 23 日,Ronin 网络的九个验证节点中的四个 Ronin 验证器和一个由 Axie DAO 运行的第三方验证器被黑客控制。而 Ronin 官方团队在被黑客攻击 7 日后意识到这个安全漏洞,在这期间攻击者使用被黑的私钥来伪造假提款,从 Ronin 跨链桥中提取了 173, 600 个 ETH 和 2550 万美元的 USDC,价值 6 亿美元。

相关阅读:《Ronin 被盗官方梳理: 6 天前发现漏洞, 5 个私钥被盗

在团队宣布被盗后,RON 在一天内跌去 20% ,并在之后的一个月里持续下跌,缩水 84% 。2022 年的绝大部分时间,RON 的价格都在 1 美元以下。有这样的惨痛经历,在发现 Ronin 上的资产有可疑动向后,社区的第一反应肯定是「Ronin 又被盗了?」

不过此时的 Ronin 已经不同往日,近一年,随着 Ronin 不断完善其基础设施和实力链游 Pixel 的加入,社区目睹了 Ronin 从低谷走向复苏。2 月 9 日,RON 上线 Binance 交易对,在社区眼中,这是 Ronin 生态被资本肯定的信号。

相关阅读:《被盗 6 亿六百天后,Ronin 再登场

除了生态,Ronin 的安全性曾因「被盗金额达 6 亿、黑客攻击 5 日后才发现」这两点而备受社区质疑,但随着 Ronin 近年来将 9 个验证节点增加至 22 个,并在 2023 年 4 月推出委托权益证明 (DPoS) 后,其安全性已经大大提升。截止撰稿时,已经有 1.9 亿枚 RON 参与了质押。

Related Reads

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

Korean storage export data for the first 20 days of June shows substantial year-on-year increases in both value and price-per-kilogram for categories like DRAM, NAND, and SSDs. This signals a potential shift beyond simple demand recovery, indicating rising prices and a product mix shift towards higher-value items, possibly influenced by AI infrastructure needs. A key point is that the surge in price-per-kilogram is not simply a uniform chip price hike. It reflects a combination of actual price increases and, more importantly, an export structure increasingly dominated by high-value-density products like HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) and advanced DRAM, which are critical for AI servers. This suggests AI-driven demand may be spilling over from just HBM into broader memory markets. SK Hynix stands to benefit directly due to its leading HBM position. For Samsung and Micron, the implication is potential for greater margin elasticity if the tightness in high-end memory spreads to enterprise SSD and NAND prices. However, the storage sector remains cyclical. Risks include supply expansion, inventory changes, and potential slowdowns in broader AI capital expenditure. Ultimately, while the strong export data supports upward revisions for storage company earnings and fuels discussion of an "AI infrastructure bottleneck premium," a definitive valuation shift from a cyclical to a structural story depends on upcoming quarterly reports. Investors need confirmation from SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron that improvements in average selling prices, product mix, and, crucially,毛利率 are sustained over multiple quarters.

marsbit1h ago

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

marsbit1h ago

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO on June 12, 2026, with its market cap surging past $2.1 trillion. This valuation reflects its central role within Elon Musk's expansive, interconnected technological ecosystem. The article details how four core components form a synergistic closed-loop system: 1) **The "Brain" (xAI & Orbital Compute):** xAI provides AI models and massive ground/space-based supercomputing for simulation and decision-making across the system. 2) **The "Neural Logistics Core" (Starlink & Starship):** Starlink's low-latency satellite network enables global data transmission, while Starship's low-cost, reusable launch capacity aims to make large-scale space deployment economically viable. 3) **The "Physical Body" (Tesla & Optimus):** Tesla's manufacturing prowess and energy products support hardware production and power, pivoting toward mass-producing the Optimus humanoid robot for terrestrial and potential space-based labor. 4) **The "Human Interface" (Neuralink & X):** Neuralink seeks direct brain-computer communication, and the X platform provides real-time societal data. Together, these elements create three reinforcing "flywheels": manufacturing/logistics, data-driven iteration, and energy/compute/network synergy. This integrated approach promises lower costs, faster innovation cycles, and potential infrastructure-as-a-service offerings. However, it also concentrates technical, regulatory, and corporate governance risks. Ultimately, SpaceX's high valuation stems from its position as the indispensable infrastructural backbone—handling space transport, global communications, and future orbital computing—tying together Musk's entire vision for a self-reinforcing technological empire.

marsbit1h ago

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

marsbit1h ago

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

Snap's AR Obsession: A Decade of Betting Against the Odds On June 16, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel unveiled the new AR glasses, Specs, priced at $2,195, causing the company's stock (SNAP) to plummet nearly 10%. The launch was met with intense criticism online, with investors questioning why a consistently unprofitable company would stake its future on an expensive product its core young user base can't afford. Snapchat, known for pioneering features like ephemeral Stories and popular AR lenses (like the iconic dog filter), has a history of innovation often copied by rivals like Instagram and Meta. Despite this, it has struggled to translate first-mover advantage into commercial success. Since its 2017 IPO, Snap has reported annual net losses, with a Q1 2026 loss of $89 million. Its stock is down 94% from its 2021 peak, hampered by iOS privacy changes, competition, and a young demographic less attractive to major advertisers. In this challenging context, Spiegel is doubling down on AR. He calls 2026 a "crucible moment," having recently laid off 16% of staff while reportedly investing over $3.5 billion cumulatively in its AR glasses line over nearly a decade. The new Specs represent a significant leap from the 2016 camera-focused Spectacles, offering true AR overlays, gesture control, and standalone operation. However, at $2,195, it faces tough comparisons. While more advanced than Meta's $799 Ray-Ban smart glasses, critics point to its heavier weight, short battery life, and features largely replicable by a smartphone. Facing pressure from investors to cut losses on the Specs project, Spiegel has refused, framing it as essential to Snap's long-term vision. The company finds itself in a paradoxical position: cutting costs while heavily funding a decade-long, unproven bet. Some see Specs as an awkward but necessary step in AR's evolution, akin to early mobile phones. Whether Spiegel is a visionary outlier or a gambler destined to fail remains an open question, highlighting the tension between long-term ambition and short-term market demands.

marsbit1h ago

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

marsbit1h ago

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Kalshi, a leading U.S. prediction markets platform, is reportedly in early, informal discussions for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). The company's annualized revenue now exceeds $2 billion, fueled by its dominance of over 90% of the domestic prediction market activity. This growth stems from a surge in trading volume—reaching a total of $52.7 billion—and an increase in fee rates, largely driven by sports event contracts like the NBA playoffs and the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Monthly active users are approximately 2 million. Kalshi recently raised $1 billion in a funding round led by Coatue Management, valuing the company at $22 billion. It has also expanded its offerings to include Bitcoin perpetual contracts and plans to launch a dedicated trading platform, Kalshi Pro. However, Kalshi's path to an IPO faces significant regulatory hurdles. The core risk involves jurisdictional conflicts, as multiple U.S. states are challenging its operations under local gambling laws. For instance, Arizona has filed criminal charges against the platform, while states like Kentucky have filed lawsuits. Kalshi and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) argue that its event contracts fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction as "swaps." The outcomes of these ongoing legal battles could critically impact Kalshi's core revenue and its IPO timeline. Analysts suggest that while an IPO could theoretically occur by late 2026, a more likely timeframe is late 2027 or 2028, contingent on resolving legal issues and favorable market conditions. If successful, its fundraising could significantly exceed $1 billion, given its current valuation and revenue multiple.

Foresight News1h ago

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片