U.S. Treasury Backs Down Narrative That Hamas Relied on Crypto to Fund Terrorism

CoinDeskPolicyPublished on 2024-02-13Last updated on 2024-02-14

Abstract

The Treasury's top official on terrorism, Brian Nelson, said Hamas and other groups still prefer traditional financing, and crypto isn't figuring into their funding in a big w...

  • U.S. Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Brian Nelson testified on Wednesday that terrorist group Hamas has received very little support in digital assets countering earlier reports that it got tens of millions in crypto.
  • Still, he said his office is focused on the threat from digital assets and asked Congress to help provide more tools.

Just after Hamas' terrorist attacks in Israel last year, crypto took blame for helping fund such brutal killing. While the prominent media reports were later bashed by cryptocurrency experts, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's top official on terrorism financing confirmed to lawmakers on Wednesday the situation was blown out of proportion.

10
18K

While the Wall Street Journal in October had tied tens of millions of dollars in crypto payments to Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and others, citing a blog post by analytics firm Elliptic that was later edited, the account represented a misunderstanding of what assets actually fell into the hands of terrorists.

"We don't expect the number is very high," said Brian Nelson, the Treasury's undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, in testimony before the House Financial Services Committee.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Journal had largely revised the initial reporting after blockchain analytical firms Elliptic and Chainalysis offered data to refute it. Even after that reassessment, lawmakers such as Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) continued to use the data in arguments to support legislative efforts to saddle the crypto industry with strict rules in the name of national security.

"To be clear, Hamas is using crypto in relatively small amounts compared to what's been widely reported," Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) prompted Nelson at the Wednesday hearing.

"That's our assessment," Nelson answered, additionally clarifying that those groups have their eyes on other methods of support.

"We also assess that terrorists still prefer, frankly, to use traditional products and services," he said. The Treasury has targeted a number of businesses and regional financial firms with sanctions, accusing them of offering such aid.

Emmer asked the Treasury official to more formally correct the record about the relationship between digital assets and terrorism, noting "we have senators who are legislating on these false figures."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Despite Nelson's answers to Emmer, he'd said in his earlier, prepared remarks that the government is "focused on disrupting these groups’ ability to leverage digital assets."

"To root out illicit finance by players in virtual asset markets and forums, we need additional tools and resources," Nelson argued, saying he's eager to work with Congress on that.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Related Reads

Strong Growth, Moderate Rate Hikes, Controllable Oil Prices: The Market is Pricing a Non-existent Perfection

The global market is currently pricing in a contradictory "Goldilocks" scenario of robust growth, limited interest rate hikes, manageable energy supply shocks, and declining oil prices. Deutsche Bank strategist Henry Allen warns this leaves little room for error regarding policy, inflation, or geopolitics. While U.S. equities hit record highs and credit spreads are tight, signaling strong growth, interest rate markets price in only minimal Fed tightening ahead, despite inflation remaining above target. This combination is difficult to sustain. Historically, starting inflation levels suggest a much more aggressive Fed hiking cycle than currently anticipated, as seen in 2022. Furthermore, oil price declines contradict ongoing supply risks, with the Strait of Hormuz still disrupted. Market expectations for future supply recovery and lower prices depend on resolutions not yet achieved. Energy volatility and potential new inflationary pressures from AI-driven demand highlight persistent inflation risks. The core risk is that the multiple optimistic assumptions underpinning current asset prices fail to materialize simultaneously. Strong growth with loose financial conditions could force more aggressive Fed action, while prolonged energy disruptions could undermine disinflation. Markets have priced a near-perfect outcome with minimal margin for deviation, meaning any single factor disappointing expectations could trigger a broad repricing of growth, rates, and risk assets.

marsbit1h ago

Strong Growth, Moderate Rate Hikes, Controllable Oil Prices: The Market is Pricing a Non-existent Perfection

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片