盘点:国内虚拟数字人TOP50排行榜

01区块链Published on 2022-05-09Last updated on 2022-05-09

Abstract

虚拟人又称数字人,指人们在计算机上模拟出一个类似真人的虚拟人形象。

虚拟数字人是目前最火热的赛道之一。
虚拟人又称数字人,指人们在计算机上模拟出一个类似真人的虚拟人形象。自2021年下半年以来,虚拟数字人频频登上各类型节目、晚会和大型运动赛事,为观众带来耳目一新的体验。此外,传媒和金融等行业也纷纷推出相关虚拟数字人服务大众,一时间,虚拟人成为潮流。
目前,国内虚拟数字人相关产业生态已经初步完善。启信宝数据显示,在虚拟数字人相关企业的投资领域,2022年开年还不到一个月,虚拟人领域近百起融资累计金额已经超过4亿元,仅2021年国内就新增虚拟数字人相关企业超6万家。
从虚拟数字人的应用场景区分,大致能够分成两类。一类是身份型虚拟人,如虚拟化身和虚拟偶像,另一类是服务型(功能型)虚拟人。为进一步了解国内虚拟数字人的实际落地现状,零壹智库、01区块链联合《陆家嘴》杂志针对虚拟数字人发布第一期TOP50榜单(虚拟偶像TOP30和虚拟员工TOP20),并梳理虚拟数字人的产业链和相关公司。
一、虚拟偶像榜单
身份型虚拟人榜单拥有独立身份,被赋予具有个性的人格特征。在中国,内容生态发展具备较好的土壤,虚拟偶像赛道激烈,目前已经孵化出较多具备影响力的虚拟偶像。根据目前虚拟偶像的影响力,从粉丝数、内容产品、商业合作项目情况等,本文评出虚拟偶像TOP30榜单。

二、虚拟员工榜单
服务型(功能型)虚拟人能够投入生产和服务,以虚拟化身的形象执行偏标准化的工作。目前服务型虚拟人(也被称为虚拟员工)落地的领域包括虚拟新闻播报者、虚拟主播、数字讲解员、金融虚拟智能顾问等。根据目前服务型虚拟人的落地实况,包括虚拟人公司影响力、“业务能力”、以及落地场景的热度,本文评出虚拟员工TOP20榜单。

三、虚拟数字人相关企业
目前,国内虚拟数字人相关产业链主要能够分成四类:基础层、平台层、应用层和综合性厂商。
基础层看,虚拟数字人的生产制作主要分为硬件和软件两个部分,硬件包括芯片、显示设备、传感器等;软件包括交互软件、建模软件、渲染引擎等。
平台层是将技术层中各独立技术进行串联,应用在具体的项目设计中,主要包括建模、动捕、渲染等制作环节,以及虚拟数字人的外观设计、包装、宣传、落地和培养。
应用层是将虚拟数字人应用于各行业领域。目前,基于中国庞大的内容消费需求,在文娱、影视、传媒等领域推出的虚拟人有较好的发展基础,此外,在金融、文旅等领域,虚拟员工也逐渐受到重视。
此外,互联网巨头企业例如百度、阿里巴巴等以综合性厂商的形式出现在虚拟数字人产业,这类公司在底层技术、应用平台以及虚拟空间的打造上展现出较强的综合性实力。
下面,针对国内虚拟数字人产业相关公司,本文选取了部分具有代表性的公司做出介绍。

数据来源:零壹智库、01区块链根据公开资料整理

Related Reads

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

Hiring in Crypto: Balancing Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent As the crypto industry grows, founders face the dilemma of whether to prioritize hiring professionals with blockchain experience or those with traditional tech backgrounds who can learn. The key is recognizing that crypto companies are still tech companies at their core and should apply proven hiring best practices. Crypto-native talent offers immediate productivity and is essential for roles involving high-stakes, specialized work like smart contract development, where errors can be catastrophic. However, traditional professionals from large-scale software companies bring valuable experience in scaling products, operational flexibility, and expertise in areas like fintech, UX, and security, which are crucial as crypto products target mainstream adoption. Recruiting requires tailored approaches. Some candidates may be hesitant due to crypto's volatility or complexity, while others are excited by its innovative potential. Assess candidates' motivations, curiosity, and alignment with the company's vision early. Emphasize the opportunity to shape technology's future and address financial incentives, such as token-based compensation, which can offer liquidity compared to traditional equity. Onboarding is critical. Identify knowledge gaps during hiring and design education programs, mentorship, knowledge-sharing sessions, and resources like blogs or courses to accelerate learning. Pairing new hires with experienced crypto professionals helps bridge gaps and fosters collaboration. Ultimately, successful teams blend both crypto-native and traditional talent, leveraging their strengths to drive innovation and growth.

marsbit37m ago

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

marsbit37m ago

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

On April 19, a major DeFi security breach occurred, resulting in the loss of approximately $292 million. The attack targeted Kelp DAO’s rsETH bridge contract built on LayerZero, with 116,500 rsETH stolen. The attacker initiated the exploit using funds from Tornado Cash and manipulated the LayerZero EndpointV2 contract to transfer the assets. Kelp DAO confirmed the incident and temporarily paused rsETH contracts across multiple networks while collaborating with security experts for investigation. Initial analysis suggests the root cause was a compromised private key on the source chain, with the contract secured by only a 1/1 validator set, making it vulnerable to a single malicious transaction. The attacker used the stolen rsETH as collateral on lending platforms—including Aave, Compound, and Euler—to borrow more liquid assets like WETH, accumulating over $236 million in debt. Aave alone accounted for $196 million of this amount. In response, Aave froze its rsETH markets and stated it would explore covering potential bad debt through its Umbrella safety module, which holds around $50 million in WETH. This incident follows another large exploit earlier in April, where Drift Protocol on Solana lost $280 million. The repeated high-value attacks raise concerns about DeFi security, even affecting major protocols like Aave. Users are advised to exercise caution, diversify holdings, and limit exposure to on-chain protocols until more robust security measures are established.

marsbit2h ago

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片