从新发布的Litepaper出发，聊聊Treasure Chain的游戏生态梦想

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-02-06Last updated on 2024-02-06

Abstract

TreasureDAO推出了游戏链，而这条链就是为了实现不同游戏之间互操作性的，进而实现Web3特色的游戏生态。

原文作者：蓝狐笔记

根据 Treasure 链今天出炉的 litepaper，简单聊聊 Treasure DAO（Magic）的游戏生态梦想。

Treasure Chain 是 Treasure DAO（Magic）推出的一条游戏链。对于刚开始了解 magic 的小伙伴们，简单来说，TreasureDAO（Magic）试图做一个游戏平台，用户通过进入 Treasure 链平台，可以体验各种不同的 web3 游戏，同时，这些游戏之间并不是孤立存在，会有互通，比如角色、道具、玩法的互通，换个复杂一些的话来说，就是具有互操作性。（更多介绍也可以搜索之前关于 magic 的帖子）

为了实现这个计划，TreasureDAO 推出了游戏链，而这条链就是为了实现不同游戏之间互操作性的，进而实现 web3 特色的游戏生态。在这条游戏链中，经济机制的基础是 magic，这是它联系不同游戏的纽带，也是实现其链安全的基石。magic 之于 Treasure chain 正如 eth 之于以太坊的关系。

1.infinity chain 的梦想

从 TreasureChain 的简易白皮书看，它有一个游戏生态的大梦想。它计划的未来并不是完全固定于某个 L2 上，也不是一个单一的基于 L2 的游戏应用链，它有一个 infinity chain（无限链）的概念。早期主要利用 arbitrum 的 rollup 技术来构建，但不会限于 arbitrum 技术，除了 Arbitrum，未来也计划与 OP、Zksync、polygon 和 immutable 平台实现互通，它最终目标是成为跨 Rollup/ 链的游戏平台。对于用户来说，不用管底层是 arb、op、Zksync 或者其他各种 L2/ 链技术，用户从 Treasure 平台进入之后，不会感知到多种链或 L2 本身存在。magic 链会跟各种 L2 或 evm 兼容链打通，开发者可以构建自己的游戏链，并通过去中心化共享排序器，实现不同 L2 之间游戏间的互操作。到了最后，Treasure 链的核心就是去中心化的共享排序器。

2.TeasureChain 对开发者的好处

对 web3 游戏开发者来说，为什么不是直接在 arb、op、zksync、starknet 等上直接开发游戏，而是通过 TreasureChain 来进行？其中的一些好处是，除了游戏之间的协同效应之外，它还计划提供一些其他游戏链可能缺乏的服务。例如，一些功能丰富的发行堆栈（包括链上和链下功能）、更低费用（DAC 数据可用性委员会）、玩家账户体系（支持无障碍登录等）、游戏专属 NFT 交易市场、游戏代币 AMM 市场（流动性）、本地支付、分析工具、社区用户、玩家为中心的服务功能（统一入口、锦标赛、任务和奖励系统、消息通知、邮件通知等）、开发套件（TDK，为开发者将各种功能引入到游戏中）、管理平台（用户管理、查看游戏数据和关键指标、管理任务、锦标赛等）等。也就是，跟 xai 和 ronin 等游戏链相比，magic 试图打造出自身的特色。

随着 Arbitrum Stylus 的发展，更多开发者利用自己熟悉的语言来构建游戏。Treasure 链计划利用 Arbitrum 的跨链消息传递实现与 Arbitrum 生态的其他游戏连接，这样可以进一步发展器游戏生态。Treasue 链也会使用 Stylus 来构建，同时采用 DAC 的模式，也就是数据可用性委员会来存储链上数据，降低费用。DAC 中的委员最初由基础设施以及游戏领域的知名组织组成，需要通过 DAO 投票批准。排序器最初由 Treasure DAO 的核心贡献者维护，同时计划向 DAO 提议来自排序器的收入会烧毁（收入收取 magic，会造成 magic 通缩，其通缩的程度跟排序器收入相关），后续逐步过渡到去中心化的排序器阶段。

3.Magic 与 Treasure 链管理和经济机制

Treasure DAO 由 magic 持有者管理，关于 Treasure 链的重大决策均通过 DAO 方式来进行，其中包括 DAC 的批准、链的启动、排序器收入的烧毁等决策。

其中大家关注较多的是 magic 代币在 Treasure Chain 生态中的作用，目前为止，从其简易白皮书披露来看，包括了如下几点：

magic 作为 Treasure 游戏链的 gas 费用；
magic 用于 Treasure 游戏链的质押代币，负责安全；
Magic 作为 TreasueDAO 治理代币；
Magic 作为游戏市场交易媒介；
Magicswap 的流动性提供交易对代币；
未来排序器的收入用于烧毁 Magic。

最后，Treasure 链的测试网计划于 2024 年第一季度推出；主网计划于 2024 年第三季度推出。

风险警示：以上所有分析仅是对技术和市场的片面观察，不一定对，请务必保持自己的判断并做好风险控制。

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit36m ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit36m ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit52m ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit52m ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit1h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit1h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinist2h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinist2h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries