盘点值得关注的七款高潜力DeFi产品

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-02-06Last updated on 2024-02-06

Abstract

本文将介绍几款有趣的DeFi产品。

原文作者：THE DEFI INVESTOR

原文编译：深潮 TechFlow

导读

本期文章旨在列举近期我频繁使用的一些创新 DeFi 产品。通过实践链上应用，相比仅仅阅读概念，能够更加容易地理解加密货币相关概念。更重要的是，早期采纳者因空投而获得的慷慨回报在许多情况下带来了巨大收益。本期我将介绍几款我强烈推荐的有趣 DeFi 产品。

Pendle 的再质押池

一些人可能已经知道的，Pendle是最大的收益交易协议。

通过使用它，您可以押注某个收益机会的收益是否会增加或减少，从您的资本中赚取固定收益等等。

但在本文中，我将主要关注其新推出的流动性再质押池，因为 Pendle 在利用再质押叙事方面做得非常好。

目前为止，Pendle 已经为 3 种流动性再质押代币推出了收益交易池：

  • Kelp DAO 的 rsETH

  • EtherFi 的 eETH

  • Renzo Protocol 的 ezETH

所有这些流动性再质押协议都是基于 EigenLayer 构建的，它们为其 ETH 存款者提供了一个实时积分程序。

Pendle 上再质押池的有趣之处在于，通过它们，任何人都可以对 EigenLayer 及流动性再质押项目的空投价值进行投机。

以下是 Pendle 上 rsETH 池的一个示例：

盘点值得关注的七款高潜力DeFi产品

  • 如果您相信 EigenLayer 和 Kelp DAO 的空投将非常成功：在 Pendle 购买 YT rsETH，以获得多达 27 倍的 Kelp DAO 积分和 9 倍的 EigenLayer 积分（这是一种高风险策略，因为您只有在这些积分价值相当大的情况下才能赚钱，您实际上是在购买积分）。

  • 如果您认为这些空投被高估了，且您更愿意在 ETH 上获得超过 30% 的固定 APY 而不是空投积分则购买 PT rsETH。

  • 如果您想保留您的 Eigenlayer 积分，同时在您的 ETH 上赚取额外收益 ，则可以为 rsETH 池提供流动性。

无论您是否看好 EigenLayer 生态系统空投，您都可以使用 Pendle 对它们进行预测，或者只是为了获得额外的收益。

Rabby 钱包

如果您还在使用 Metamask，我强烈推荐您试试Rabby 。

Rabby 是一款适用于以太坊和所有 EVM 链的加密钱包，由最受欢迎的 Web3 投资组合跟踪器 DeBank 背后的团队构建。

我喜欢它的几个理由：

  • 预签名检查以确保安全：这是我推荐 Rabby 的第一原因。钱包会显示您尝试签名的每笔交易的许多有用细节

盘点值得关注的七款高潜力DeFi产品

  • 更流畅的多链体验：当您使用 dApp 时，钱包会根据您访问的网站自动切换到相应的链

  • 交易模拟结果：对于与 dApp 的每次交互，钱包会显示您的预估余额变化

  • 撤销代币授权：作为额外的安全措施，您可以检查哪些 dApp 可以访问您的资金，并轻松撤销其权限

此外，在 Rabby 上进行特定操作还可以赚取 Rabby 积分，这些积分将来可能使你有资格获得 Rabby 空投。

其积分程序就在几周前推出。

Whales Market

Whales Market 是一个场外交易（OTC）去中心化交易所。

它似乎是 Solana 原生 dApps 中最有趣的一个。它与其他 OTC DEX 的不同之处在于，除了代币和 NFT 外，它还允许交易积分和未来空投配额。

盘点值得关注的七款高潜力DeFi产品

Whales Market 已经使其用户能够交易 EigenLayer、FriendTech 和 Hyperliquid 的积分，很快还将启用 Blast、Kamino、Drift 和 MarginFi 积分的交易。

如果你在收集空投，并且想要出售你未来的空投配额，或者你想要购买未来的空投配额，不妨查看该平台。

我也发现它对于估算你想要收集的空投的潜在价值很有用。

例如，目前 Whale Market 上 1 个 Hyperliquid 积分的价格是 2 美元，但在过去几周内波动很大。

RocketX

盘点值得关注的七款高潜力DeFi产品

现在有很多不同的加密货币桥。

但大多数桥的问题在于，它们只支持少数几个区块链，通常是最受欢迎的那些。

如果你想将你的资金桥接到 Cosmos L1或其他不太受欢迎的链上，在很多情况下，你可能会发现在不使用中心化交易所的情况下很难做到。

RocketX 本质上是一个混合的 CEX 和 DEX 聚合器。

对于你想要进行的每一笔跨链交换，它都会在数十个桥和中心化交易所中搜索你的订单的最佳价格。

它有趣的地方在于，它支持在超过 200 个区块链上转移资产，所以几乎每个相关的区块链都得到了支持。

对于那些有时候很难找到支持特定跨链交易的桥的人来说，我建议尝试使用 RocketX。

Picasso

盘点值得关注的七款高潜力DeFi产品

在 Ethereum 上，再质押无疑是目前最热门的话题。

其他区块链上关于再质押的讨论不多，但 Solana 无疑也是目前最热门的生态系统之一。

就在上周， Picasso发布了 Solana 上的第一个再质押项目。

用户现在可以在 Picasso 的再质押库中存入 SOL 或 SOL 流动性质押代币。这些再质押的资产将被用于在即将到来的 Solana-IBC 连接中保障验证者。

简单来说，由于 Picasso 的再质押，Solana 将首次以最小信任方式与 IBC 启用的链无缝互操作。

IBC 启用的链包括 Cosmos Hub、Cosmos SDK 链、Polkadot 和 Kusama 平行链等。

在 Picasso 上的 SOL 再质押者通过代币发行形式在其资本上获得 71% 的 APY 奖励。该协议的金库上限目前已满，但不久将会增加。

从长远来看，再质押有潜力显著增加L1代币的需求，所以很高兴看到再质押也在除 Ethereum 之外的其他链上扩展。

Orca

Orca 是 Kujira 构建的产品，Kujira 是 Cosmos L1 项目，其核心团队开发了广泛的产品。

简而言之，这个产品通过清算使购买资产价格有折扣。

通常在货币市场和交易所上，只有机器人可以参与清算过程。

Orca 通过允许任何人无需编码技能或机器人就可以出价竞购被清算的抵押品，使这一过程民主化。

在 Kujira 网络上，用户可以借助多种抵押资产借出 USK 稳定币。如果他们的贷款价值比率上升过高，他们的头寸将被清算，他们的抵押品将在 ORCA 上拍卖。

Orca 用户现在有可能以低于当前市场价格的折扣购买这些被清算的资产。他们需要做的就是在访问平台后决定：

  • 要出价哪些被清算资产

  • 出价金额

  • 出价的折扣（优惠）

完成这些操作后，Orca 将负责剩下的所有工作。

目前，被清算抵押品的出价价值相对较低（过去 7 天仅 26000 美元），因此并不是很多出价能够成交。

但随着 Kujira 生态系统的增长，这个价值很可能也会上升。

Avocado Wallet

Avocado Wallet是一个具有高级账户抽象化功能的智能合约钱包。

它由 Instadapp 创建，Instadapp 是以太坊上最受欢迎的 DeFi 项目之一，拥有超过 20 亿美元的总锁定价值（TVL）。

对于那些在许多不同区块链上使用 DeFi 的用户来说，Avocado 可以让您的链上活动变得更轻松，这要归功于它的一些关键功能：

  • 网络抽象：就像 Rabby 一样，智能合约钱包自动连接到每个你试图与之交互的 dApp 的正确网络

  • Gas 抽象化： Avocado 通过使用统一的 USDC gas 储备来抽象化 gas 费用。你只需使用任何网络的 USDC 充值，然后你在包括以太坊、Polygon、Avalanche 等主要链上的交易费用将以 USDC 计价（值得一提的是，Avocado 对 gas 费用收取 20% 的费用）

  • 跨链发送：你可以直接从钱包轻松地将资金从一个区块链发送到另一个区块链

由于它是一个智能合约钱包而不是普通钱包，因此您可以像使用 Metamask 或其他钱包连接到任何其他 dApp 一样连接到 Avocado。

盘点值得关注的七款高潜力DeFi产品

你不需要下载任何扩展程序。糟糕的跨链用户体验是加密领域最大的问题之一，Avocado 钱包是为此提供最佳解决方案之一的钱包。

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit35m ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit35m ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit52m ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit52m ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit1h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit1h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinist2h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinist2h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片