除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-02-05Last updated on 2024-02-05

Abstract

Farcaster作为一个加密社交的新阵地还会催生出更多的新项目和代币。

原文作者:深潮 TechFlow

最近一周,加密市场中频繁提及的话题,是 Farcaster。

作为一个建立在以太坊上基于 OP Stack 的社交协议,用户拥有以太坊钱包即可注册。

其界面和功能看起来都与推特类似,但与传统的 Web2 平台相比,Farcaster 强调用户对数据的控制,并允许社交数据在其生态系统内的不同应用程序之间进行转移。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

早在 2021 年,Farcaster 就已经完成了由 A16Z 领投的 3000 万美金的天使轮融资,且 Vitalik 等加密核心人物经常在其中发表见解。

而今,是什么让 Farcaster 再度火热?

从开发端看,近期 Farcaster 推出了 Frame 的新功能,它可以将任何 cast(你可以理解成 Farcaster 的推文或帖子)变成一个交互式应用;这个新功能为 Farcaster 生态系统带来了更多的可能性,包括在 cast 中内置的空投检查器和一键免 Gas 费的 NFT 铸造。

也就是说,Frame 很容易吸引加密开发者,为更多玩出花的加密业态铺路。

而在用户端,Faracaster 上的代币空投,则让财富效应更进一步传播,更多用户因为部分人早期的空投收益纷纷开始投机尝试。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

在多重因素刺激下,Farcaster 的用户量、发帖数和活跃度都显著提升, 手机端 warpcast 一度崩溃无法登录,而这种迹象或许也为叙事热点的轮转打开了一个新机会。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

当前的 Farcaster 生态中,有哪些代币和项目还值得进一步关注?

$Degen : Facaster 的 meme 龙头

币如其名,该代币更多包含着投机意味,同时也是 Farcaster 生态中目前的代币龙头。

该代币的起源非常简单,用户只要在 Farcaster 的 degen 频道中进行发言等其他活跃动作,就有可能会收到 $Degen 代币奖励。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

从本质上看,Degen 是一个 MEME 代币,更多在鼓励加密 degen 们在 Farcaster 上讨论投机信息。但如今 Degen 也从一众空投代币中杀出重围,成为了加密媒体近期关注的焦点。

代币生成在 Base 链上,当前 Degen 的市值已经来到 1.1 亿美金,且最近 24 小时价格迎来巨大上涨。

而在 1 月 26 日左右,Degen 的价格不过 0.0002 美金,目前看已经上涨了接近 15 倍。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

在 Degen 的代币经济学中, 15% 的代币总量已经被空投出去,而下一阶段还有 20% 左右的空投会产生,因此积极在 Degen 频道中做更多活跃的动作或有机会得到更多空投;而作为目前 Farcaster 生态的龙头 MEME,直接关注 Degen 二级市场本身的表现也是一个不错的选择。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

$ Frame:与 Frame 功能重名的代币

与 Farcaster 最近的推出的 Frame 功能同名的代币,目前市值不到 700 万美金,与$DEGEN 相差甚远,不过也意味着更多的机会。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

代币最初于 2 月 2 日在 Base 上创建,其目的是为了测试 Farcaster 上的 Frame 的功能而进行的实验,但随后演变成更多与 MEME 相关的一种符号。

目前$FRAME 将用于向 Farcaster 生态系统中的 Builder,特别是那些使用 Frames 构建的 builder 提供赠款、赏金和奖励。但空投代币已经领完,目前仅可在 Uniswap 等二级市场上进行购买。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

$Cast : 与发帖功能重名的代币

在 Farcast 的应用 app warpcast 中,你的每一个发帖都有一个名为「cast」的按钮,点击即可发送自己的帖子。除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

因此 cast 与发推的意思类似,也构成了 Farcast 最核心的功能之一。同样的,MEME 无孔不入,与该功能重名的$CAST 代币开始出现,截止发文时市值仅为 4 万美金。

需要注意的是,这种强行绑定层概念的代币风险与收益并存,可能会瞬间引起注意,也可能会快速被人遗忘。但与铭文早期的占山为王抢先命名一样,与核心概念绑定的越早,越容易吸引热度和关注。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

对于市值更小的代币,类似的还有 $Far(致敬 Farcaster 的名字),还请 DYOR。

$Points : 因玩笑诞生又老树开花的 MEME

早在去年 12 月,推特用户 Kyle McCollom 发了条推文,预测会有一个名为 Points 的 MEME 币出现,而且注定会失败。除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

这个看似随意的推文由一名加密行业的 OG Matthias 实现,他部署了一份合约,向 Farcaster 用户发起了 $Points 代币空投,并创建了一个铸币前端。

在去年 12 月中,Points 代币暴涨,曾一度较开盘时上涨 2800% 左右,但随后慢慢没了热度,价格也回到了冰点。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

之前,创始人 Matthias 甚至还直播销毁了 Points 代币供应的 75% ,颇有一种公开透明的娱乐精神。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

近期随着 Farcaster 又一次火热,Points 代币也迎来了阶段性上涨。从下图可以看到,Points 在 3 号左右突然快速拉升,随后又迅速回落。

作为一个 Farcaster 相关的早期 MEME,一点风吹草动必然会波及到该代币的表现,因此或许也可以将其加入观察清单,配合 Farcaster 的相关利好利空进行操作。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

NFT 相关

除了 MEME 以外,一些 NFT 项目也值得关注。

Farcaster OG:

官方发的 OG NFT,有一定的空投预期,当前地板价已经来到了 2.4 E。除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

Farcats:

以猫形象为主的 NFT 系列,官方描述其为 Farcaster 的吉祥物,以 1661 个独特且可收藏的 NFT 的形式出现。当前地板价为 0.7 E 左右

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

Castaways:

由 Farcaster 生态内最知名艺术家 0x en 创作,一千个独特的 Farcaster NFT 的集合。该系列最初是对 Farcaster「拱形」标志的模因可能性的探索,后来演变成一个拥有无数重新诠释的大型系列。

当前地板价 0.25 E 左右。

值得一提的是,该项目是一个老系列,去年 3 月就开始了 Mint,但是一直没有太多的热度,直到今年 2 月左右,Farcaster 翻红,所有的 NFT 才被 Mint 完毕。

除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

总体上来看,Farcaster 主应用的火热,给了 Meme 和 NFT 短期蹿升的空间,同时也更表明加密热点的快速轮转多诞生于社交讨论中。

Farcaster 作为一个加密社交的新阵地,其中必然还会催生出更多的新项目和代币;对普通玩家来说,必须积极参与到该社交平台中关注新话题的动向,尽可能的参与讨论,以博取空投的新机会,和发现早期新项目的信息差。

对 Farcaster 有兴趣的读者,也可以通过笔者的邀请链接进行注册,成功注册后也可以得到 50 个 warps,用于在应用中创建频道、Mint NFT 或进行更多操作。除了Meme币,Farcaster生态还有哪些项目值得关注?

原文链接

Related Reads

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit51m ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit51m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片