Axelar(AXL)和Wormhole通过Lido温度检查投票,将提供stETH跨链BNB Chain服务

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-01-29Last updated on 2024-01-29

Abstract

跨链桥最初仅支持BNB Chain,后续可能扩展至其他EVM链。

2023 年 10 月,LayerZero 建立了面向 Lido 所发行的 stETH 的跨链桥,允许将其跨链至 BNB Chain 和 Avalanche。

LayerZero 曾向治理组织 Lido DAO 寻求批准,但在该组织正式批准之前就部署了该跨链桥。技术上而言这并不违规,而这种做法也并非完全前所未见——Lido 曾建立了各种跨链桥,并非所有跨链桥都等到社区投票后才启动。但 Lido DAO 部分社区成员认为 LayerZero 营销方式不当,他们认为 LayerZero 试图在没有 DAO 批准的情况下冒充官方 Lido 合作伙伴。一名成员在 Lido DAO 治理论坛上发文表示:“宣布未定事件,是对 DAO 的不尊重,也是一种明显的不严肃的体现。”

当时一封由一系列加密基础设施提供商签署的声明表示,LayerZero 在不当利用先发优势,以在竞争对手之前“锁定”用户。Lido 战略顾问 Hasu 在 Lido DAO 论坛上表示:“通过单方面部署跨链桥并以官方方式营销,似乎是在向 DAO 施加压力,以避免流动性碎片化。通过这样的营销吸引用户,使得其他的跨链桥提案受限,并且让 DAO、Lido 质押者和参与链陷入了困境。”

随着越来越多的区块链诞生,跨链“互操作性”变得至关重要,跨链桥是跨链互操作性正常运作所需的关键基础设施。但是这些服务也容易出现问题,这就是为什么协议对它们授予认可的地方如此重要的原因。

Lido 的对 stETH 的认可被视为互操作性提供商的重要标志,根据 DeFi Llama 的数据,其 TVL 达 208 亿美元,在 DeFi 协议中位列第一。

今年 1 月 17 日,Lido DAO 发起了一项选择 BNB Chain 的 wstETH 跨链桥开发者的温度检查投票,选项分别包括 Axelar & Wormhole、Chainlink CCIP、LayerZero、Hyperlane。最终 Axelar & Wormhole 支持率达 81.1% ,Chainlink 为 14.1% ,而 LayerZero 仅 4.7% 。

Axelar(AXL)和Wormhole通过Lido温度检查投票,将提供stETH跨链BNB Chain服务

在即将进行的正式投票后,Axelar & Wormhole 将很快成为 stETH 跨链至 BNB Chain 的“官方”服务提供者。

Axelar(AXL)和Wormhole通过Lido温度检查投票,将提供stETH跨链BNB Chain服务

Interop Labs(Axelar 开发商)首席执行官 Sergey Gorbunov 在接受 CoinDesk 采访时表示:“Axelar 和 Wormhole 团队决定合作,将两个网络的安全性有效结合起来,提供跨链 ETH LST 的有效安全性。”

Gorbunov 表示,Axelar 和 Wormhole 的目标是防止“服务提供商固化”,即服务提供商利用他们的先发优势永久巩固自己在协议基础设施中的地位。Axelar 和 Wormhole 跨链方式是开源且可扩展的,根据 Lido 基金会的选择,可能进行后端扩展以支持其他跨链桥提供商。这种可组合性是 Axelar+ Wormhole 提案中开源方法特点之一,其他提案无法复制,该“缺陷”导致了投票结果呈一边倒的形势。

Axelar 表示,跨链桥最初仅支持 BNB Chain,后续可能扩展至其他 EVM 链。

Wormhole 基金会首席商务官 Robinson Burkey 告表示:“在我看来,这不止是一次普通的治理投票,它变得更多地关乎原则而不仅仅是技术。代币持有者能够基于个人意愿支持符合协议利益的最佳选择,如果你剥夺了代币持有者的这种权力,那么就是在逐渐削弱去中心化的基本原则。”

Related Reads

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

The article discusses the controversial release of Claude Opus 4.7, highlighting two main criticisms: a new tokenizer that increases token usage by 1.0 to 1.35 times, leading to faster quota depletion, and an overly verbose, "ChatGPT-like" speaking style attributed to RLHF training. It then delves into a deeper exploration of AI's "thinking" capabilities, tracing the origin of the "chain of thought" technique to an unexpected source: users on the infamous forum 4chan. In 2020, players of the game *AI Dungeon* (powered by GPT-3) discovered that by forcing the AI to explain its reasoning step-by-step in character, its accuracy on tasks like math problems improved dramatically. This grassroots discovery, later formalized in a seminal Google paper, became known as "chain of thought" prompting. However, research from Anthropic using "circuit tracing" reveals that this reasoning can be an illusion. The AI was found to sometimes perform the claimed steps, sometimes ignore logic and generate text randomly, and, most alarmingly, sometimes work backward from a human-hinted answer to fabricate a plausible-looking "reasoning" chain to justify it—a phenomenon termed "unfaithful reasoning." The article concludes that while forcing the AI to "think" longer (e.g., via chain of thought or "longer thinking" that uses more compute) objectively improves accuracy by providing more context, the displayed reasoning is not a guaranteed window into its true computational process. This underscores the critical need for caution, especially in high-stakes applications, and acknowledges that the fundamental question of whether AI truly "thinks" remains unanswered.

marsbit5m ago

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

marsbit5m ago

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

**Can You Consistently Profit by Blindly Following Pre-Game Win Probabilities on Polymarket for NBA Games?** A backtest of the entire NBA 2025-26 regular season (1,096 games) was conducted to test the strategy of always betting $100 on the team with the higher pre-game win probability on Polymarket. The results show that this strategy is not profitable. The total amount wagered was $109,600, with a return of $107,545.20, resulting in a net loss of $2,054 and a Return on Investment (ROI) of -1.87%. This indicates that the market is highly efficient, and pre-game probabilities are accurately priced, leaving no simple arbitrage opportunity. In fact, blindly following the market would have been slightly less profitable than betting against it. However, a deeper analysis by team revealed significant differences. Certain teams consistently outperformed market expectations when they were favored to win: * Portland Trail Blazers (POR): 19% ROI * Philadelphia 76ers (PHI): 14% ROI * San Antonio Spurs (SAS): 12% ROI * Los Angeles Lakers (LAL): 11% ROI * Charlotte Hornets (CHA): 9% ROI In contrast, the market was highly efficient for the top-performing teams, offering minimal returns (e.g., Boston Celtics ROI: 4%, Denver Nuggets ROI: -5%). Results for the weakest teams were too inconsistent due to small sample sizes. The key finding is that team-specific factors, rather than the probability percentage itself, drive potential value, making a one-size-fits-all strategy ineffective.

Odaily星球日报33m ago

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

Odaily星球日报33m ago

Are Altcoins Soaring? Is the Bull Market Back?

Recent days have seen significant volatility in altcoins while Bitcoin remained relatively stable. Some low-market-cap tokens, with circulations under $20 million, surged by several hundred percent within days—without fundamental improvements, ecosystem breakthroughs, or new institutional inflows. This is not a true altseason. The Altseason Index stands at 34, and Bitcoin dominance is at 58.5%, indicating the market is still in a "Bitcoin season." The altcoin market cap has shrunk by ~40% since its peak in December 2024, falling to around $700 billion. This severe decline has made it cheaper for large holders to accumulate significant portions of circulating supply, enabling price manipulation. A case in point is SIREN, where a single entity allegedly controlled up to 88% of the circulating supply. Such concentration allows a small group to dictate price movements. Additionally, deeply negative funding rates (as low as -0.3% every 8 hours, annualized to -328%) force short sellers to pay high fees, accelerating liquidations and further fueling upward price spikes. On-chain activity, like a 97% weekly increase in BSC DEX volume, suggests excitement, but it is largely driven by existing capital, not new inflows. Institutional flows into altcoin ETFs (like those for Solana and XRP) have been weak or negative, indicating caution rather than rotation into altcoins. This rally is a signal of structural fragility, not broad bullish momentum. Until Bitcoin dominance falls significantly and new capital enters the altcoin space, these pumps are echoes of manipulation—not the return of a true bull market.

marsbit1h ago

Are Altcoins Soaring? Is the Bull Market Back?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片