一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-01-29Last updated on 2024-01-29

Abstract

活动包括三重收益:Eigenpie积分、Eigenlayer积分和IDO份额。

原文作者:CapitalismLab

Magpie 针对 LRT 的 subDAO @Eigenpiexyz_io 今天开启了积分活动,这是目前为止 LRT 项目中给 TVL 提供者最大蛋糕的,项目有特色外加此前 Magpie 的 subDAO 有着不菲的收益,配置价值恒奥。

本 Thread 将分析 Eigenpie 的空投玩法,机制,前景,和收益预期,帮你明明白白地取得最大化收益。

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

A. 空投玩法

当前存 stETH 等 LST 进去可以获取三重收益:

  • Eigenpie 积分,对应总量 10% 的空投

  • Eigenlayer 积分 ( 2 月 5 日 Eigenlayer 开放存款后)

  • Eigenpie 对应总量 24% IDO 份额, 3 M FDV 低估值

  • 所存 LST 的基础收益(比如 mETH APR 是 7% 那你可以继续享受 7% )

积分会根据车队总规模提供增益,越大的车队增幅越大,最高两倍,所以最好抱团取暖。

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

B. 机制

Eigenpie 做的是为 isolate LRT(ILRT),每个 LST 发一个对应的 Token 隔离风险,参见下表

当前 Eigenlayer 上了这么多 LST,如果一个 LRT 项目笼统接受的话,那么这个项目要承担所有底层 LST 的风险,一旦某一个 LST 出现安全问题可能就会对其造成毁灭性的打击

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

所以就有了 Eigenpie 的 ILRT 可以隔离风险

隔离了风险也隔离了流动性,这是否会有问题呢?其实也不染,支持 LST 的 LRT 相比 支持 Native Staking 的 LRT,优势之一便在于可以充分利用底层 LST 的流动性。mrETH/rETH,mmETH/mETH 这些单独的 pair 其实更有利于和 LST 项目方合作激励流动性

C. 前景

这个项目有什么优势?毕竟发的的确晚了一些,但是目前的确有一块需求空缺尚未被填补:上了 Eigenlayer 的 LST 都迫切希望参与到 LRT 叙事中,而 Eigenpie 目前来看是最好的方案,每个 LST 又有独立的 LRT 不用担心给其他人做了嫁衣。像 mETH 这种利率更高的 LST,也可以继续发挥其优势。

Mint 出来的 mstETH 这些什么时候可以在 DEX 交易?是否会上 Pendle?

显而易见的是项目方有极大意愿和能力推进这些,无他,这些都可以带给 Magpie 旗下的 Cakepie,Penpie 这些 subDAO 丰厚的贿赂收益

如果你对 Magpie 的架构不了解的话,可以参考我们此前的推文

D. 收益预期

收益这边我们先看下代币经济:

• IDO: 40% 

• 空投: 10% 

• 激励 35% 

• Magpie Treasury: 15% (按照惯例不出售,staking 分红给 vlMGP)

基本是一个 FairLaunch 的操作,不同之处在于目前大部分 Fairlaunch 白名单内定比较多,而这个的 IDO 白名单大部分都明牌给 TVL 提供者

给到 TVL 提供者的权益是

  • 总量 10% 的空投

  • 60% 的 IDO 份额,IDO 占总量的 40% ,$ 3 M FDV 估值

就是说总量的 10% + 60% * 40% = 34% 都会给到 TVL 提供者,这占了初始流通的 34% / 50% = ~ 70% ,今后也没有 VC 抛压这些

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

目前 LRT 叙事非常火热,仅有 $ 7 M TVL 的 $RSTK 都有 $ 35 M mcap 和 $ 180 M FDV,目前已经发布其他几个项目的估值也非常之高

Eigenpie 最终的 TVL 多半会远高于 RSTK,如果按照 $RSTK 的 FDV 对标的话,TVL 提供者的总利润也可达: 10% * 180+ 60% * 40% *( 180-3)= $ 60 M

假设两个月后发币,平均 TVL 为 $ 200 M 的话,也是可以达到 ( 60/2)/200* 12 = 180% 的 APR,这还不包括底层 Eigenlayer points 的收益,在前 15 天作为早期提供者参与还有 2 倍的点数增幅

我们再看下此前 magpie 的 subDAO IDO 至今的涨幅

  • Penpie,IDO 3 M FDV, 14 倍

  • Radpie,两轮 IDO 平均 7.5 M FDV, 1.4 倍

  • Cakepie,IDO 20 M FDV, 2.4 倍

此番进军市场更大的 LRT 赛道,不但拿出了 3 M FDV,给到 TVL 提供者的空投和 IDO 份额均是当年 PNP 的数倍,不知收益是否会复刻甚至超越

总结:

1. 空投需要抱团取暖获取更大增幅,抱团链接:https://eigenlayer.magpiexyz.io/?ref=0x307225Bc52ef0fEDAa67b626996c0E74cEA924Ee

2. 特色机制为 ILRT 隔离各个 LST 的风险

3. 优势还有可以充分利用 Magpie 积累的 Pendle/Pancake 资源加速发展

4. 绝大部分权益明牌给到 TVL 提供者,IDO 额度透明的 Fairlaunch

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

原文链接

Related Reads

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit1h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit1h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit1h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit1h ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1h ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片