今晚空投的WEN,会是JUP前的隐藏财富密码么?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-01-26Last updated on 2024-01-26

Abstract

空投将分发给上百万个Solana地址。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Azuma

今晚空投的WEN,会是JUP前的隐藏财富密码么?

1 月 25 日,Jupiter 联合创始人 meow 于 X 平台宣布,将基于该项目最新推出的 LFG Launchpad 平台测试发行 meme 代币 WEN。

占总供应量 70% 的 WEN 将空投至上百万个 Solana 钱包地址,空投申领将于美东时间 1 月 26 日 10: 00 (北京时间今晚 23: 00)开放,持续至 1 月 29 日。

JUP 的前置预热

虽然 WEN 的代币名称系首次公布,但实际上 Jupiter 此前已就该 meme 代币的发行做过多次预告,只是一直没有透露具体名称而已。

早在 1 月 15 日 meow 宣布 JUP 将于 1 月 31 日 TGE 之时,便曾提及将在 JUP 之前进行两场测试性的发币试验,第一个代币将是 mockJUP,另一个则是某个 meme 代币,meow 当时还特别强调第二个代币将是一个真正的“meme coin”。

上周,Jupiter 官方完成了 mockJUP 的测试发行,有资格领取 JUP 空投的用户均可在一个较短的时间窗口内领取 mockJUP 的空投(现已关闭),尽管 meow 一直强调 mockJUP 毫无价值,但最终在社区的火热情绪下,该测试代币还是一度冲到了数千万美元的流通市值,大多数空投用户都拿到了一份还算不错的“猪脚饭”奖励。

今晚空投的WEN,会是JUP前的隐藏财富密码么?

本周早些时候,Jupiter 官方宣布将推出 Jupiter LFG Launchpad 平台的 Beta 版本,并透露将通过该平台来进行后续的 meme 代币以及 JUP 的发行。

昨日晚间,meow 的官宣则正式披露了该 meme 代币的最终名称为 WEN。

WEN 的 meme 属性

WEN 的 meme 属性来源于社区对于潜在空投的渴望与期待。

meow 表示,过去一个月内他几乎每天都会收到无数“Wen token”、“Wen airdrop”之类的问题,为此 meow 还特地用开玩笑的口吻写了一篇诗作为回应。在诗中,meow 写道:“Wens 意味着你们有多渴望 my shit,甚至有些人都已经想 dump my ass 了……”

今晚空投的WEN,会是JUP前的隐藏财富密码么?

出乎意料的是,meow 的这篇诗作在社区内收到了广泛欢迎。

为此,meow 选择了将其作为 NFT 铸造,但由于自己对于 NFT 并不太了解,所以 meow 委托 Ovols 团队执行了铸造操作,并将该 NFT 拆分成为了 1 万亿枚碎片 —— 从技术意义上讲,WEN 代币即为该诗作 NFT 的 FT 拆分。

WEN 的空投机制

根据现已披露的代币经济模型,WEN 的总供应量为 1 万亿枚,其分配将包括三个部分:

  • 70% 的 WEN 将空投并均分给超 100 万个 Solana 钱包地址,空投对象包括 Jupiter 用户、Ovols NFT 持有者、蓝筹 NFT 持有者、Genesis Saga NFT 持有者、mockJUP 测试用户等等;

  • 20% 的 WEN 将用于在 DLMM 构建流动性;

  • 10% 的 WEN 将保留至财库,其中 0.75% 的 WEN 将给予 Jupiter DAO, 0.25% 将给予 Jupiter 团队;

  • 空投申领结束后,所有未被申领的 WEN 均会被销毁。

Meow 补充强调,WEN 系 Ovols 团队使用 Jupiter 的 LFG Launchpad 所推出的代币,Jupiter 除了通过 LFG Launchpad 平台托管该项目并从财库份额中接收了总计 1% 的 WEN 之外,与该项目没有任何关系。

今日晚间 23: 00 ,WEN 的空投将正式开放申领,并持续至 UTC 时间 1 月 29 日 3: 00 (北京时间 11: 00)。由于所有符合条件的地址将均分空投奖励,这也意味着所有人拿到的空投数额都会相同,即 643652 枚 WEN。

今晚空投的WEN,会是JUP前的隐藏财富密码么?

考虑到此前 mockJUP 的测试空投已为许多用户提供了还算不错的价值回馈,WEN 作为 meow 预热时着墨更多的代币,今晚的开盘表现同样值得期待。

这或许会是 JUP 正式空投之前,属于 Jupiter 社区的一个隐藏财富密码。

Related Reads

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit13m ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit13m ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit25m ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit25m ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit29m ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit29m ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit34m ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit34m ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手39m ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手39m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片