RSIC:创新符文挖矿玩法,Runes协议的预热工具?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-01-24Last updated on 2024-01-24

Abstract

社区关注点落在:项目方为何保留10%?

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 夫如何

RSIC:创新符文挖矿玩法,Runes协议的预热工具?

近期,铭文市场中出现一个在玩法上创新的项目——RSIC,该项目不像之前铭文项目的铸造模式,而将 RSIC 当作类似于"矿机"的存在,开采基于 Ordinals 创始人 Casey 新开发的 Runes 协议符文。

同时,两者的名字相似性导致社区以为是 Casey 主导该项目,但抛开其他因素的存在,单看该项目确实给热度下降的铭文板块带来了新的空间。

下面,Odaily星球日报将进一步介绍 RSIC 项目及其发展路线。

RSIC 是一种点对点的符文分配系统,共计 21000 枚符文,其中 10% 团队预留, 11 枚 RSIC 转至中本聪的账户,剩余的铭文将空投至 Ordinals 社区的 9211 个地址,空投标准并没有详细说明,如果钱包中有 ORDI、节点猴等资产可以关注一下。

根据官方介绍,RSIC 本身是开采符文的特定铭文电路,乍一听觉得比较模糊,本质上可以将其视为“矿机”,其中空投给 Ordinals 社区地址的 RSIC 需要再转移一次方可激活开采能力,二级市场购买则会自动激活。

激活后的 RSIC 将在比特币网络新生区块中开采符文,具体开采的数量目前还无法查询,后续官方将提供查询前端。需要注意的是,RSIC 的数量在同一地址的持有量越多,开采的符文数量越多,不设置上限。

RSIC 真正让社区感到有意思的玩法在于开采过程中有四种不同分配符文方式,分别是固定模式、随机模式、增强模式以及减半模式:

  • 固定奖励:符文供应的 30% 将以固定奖励的方式分配。每个活跃的 RSIC 每块将获得 21 个固定奖励的符文。

  • 增强奖励:符文供应的 30% 将以增强奖励的方式分配。所有的 RSIC 都可以获得一次增强奖励。增强奖励的具体激活方式将在第 4703400000000 块发布,并通过哈希值75213f19413514e4ab30ba79a6b5713e333c91e7679c35dca979f70ea5f9c1f5进行说明。

  • 随机奖励:随机奖励占符文供应的 25% ,奖励包括 25% 基础奖励+固定和增强的剩余符文。每个块的额外奖励通过随机哈希进行分配。如果用户的 RSIC 类型代码与给定区块哈希的最后一位数字对齐,其 RSIC 将在该区块中挖掘 336 个符文。所有的 RSIC 通过视觉提示(例如橙色)指示与当前块的哈希对齐。

  • 减半奖励:在第 840, 000 块上进行 5 次分配,包括完全稀释的 5% 、 4% 、 3% 、 2% 和 1% 的符文供应。当挖掘到第 840, 000 块时,每个 RSIC 都将在该地址的连续块中获得一张抽奖券。

以上四种模式将挖矿奖励的随机性提升,更像是一种铭文开采游戏,于此同时,KOL Sillycat.sats 在 X 平台分享其根据 RSIC 的特殊符号制作的 RSIC 稀有度表。

RSIC:创新符文挖矿玩法,Runes协议的预热工具?

根据上图来看,不同的 RSIC 的稀有度略有不同,但官方尚未公布其细则,但既然具备稀有度的属性,或许还会衍生出新的玩法。

目前 RSIC 所开采的符文需要等到 Runes 比特币协议上线后才能铸造,铸造后 RSIC 的后续作用尚不可知,或许单纯作为挖矿工具,在瞬息万变的新兴市场中,其后续价值归零也有不排除可能性。

但这依旧没有阻挡 RSIC 在二级市场的火爆,根据 OKX Web3钱包的铭文板块来看,上线仅 2 天,RSIC 目前地板价 0.0355 BTC(约合 1420 USDT),总交易额约为 113 BTC。

RSIC 的玩法为铭文板块带来了新的机制,但项目方预留 10% RSIC,依旧被社区群嘲违背铭文公平发行的核心观念。单从项目空投给社区的角度出发,项目方的运作以及营销模式脱离之前的野蛮生长的铭文玩法,其空投的费用以及精心的设计更符合传统代币玩法。

这一切言论还需等项目的后续发展,目前官方仅提供了 RSIC 开采符文的玩法,但后续的细则尚未公布,让子弹再飞一会。

Related Reads

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

The article discusses the controversial release of Claude Opus 4.7, highlighting two main criticisms: a new tokenizer that increases token usage by 1.0 to 1.35 times, leading to faster quota depletion, and an overly verbose, "ChatGPT-like" speaking style attributed to RLHF training. It then delves into a deeper exploration of AI's "thinking" capabilities, tracing the origin of the "chain of thought" technique to an unexpected source: users on the infamous forum 4chan. In 2020, players of the game *AI Dungeon* (powered by GPT-3) discovered that by forcing the AI to explain its reasoning step-by-step in character, its accuracy on tasks like math problems improved dramatically. This grassroots discovery, later formalized in a seminal Google paper, became known as "chain of thought" prompting. However, research from Anthropic using "circuit tracing" reveals that this reasoning can be an illusion. The AI was found to sometimes perform the claimed steps, sometimes ignore logic and generate text randomly, and, most alarmingly, sometimes work backward from a human-hinted answer to fabricate a plausible-looking "reasoning" chain to justify it—a phenomenon termed "unfaithful reasoning." The article concludes that while forcing the AI to "think" longer (e.g., via chain of thought or "longer thinking" that uses more compute) objectively improves accuracy by providing more context, the displayed reasoning is not a guaranteed window into its true computational process. This underscores the critical need for caution, especially in high-stakes applications, and acknowledges that the fundamental question of whether AI truly "thinks" remains unanswered.

marsbit5m ago

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

marsbit5m ago

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

**Can You Consistently Profit by Blindly Following Pre-Game Win Probabilities on Polymarket for NBA Games?** A backtest of the entire NBA 2025-26 regular season (1,096 games) was conducted to test the strategy of always betting $100 on the team with the higher pre-game win probability on Polymarket. The results show that this strategy is not profitable. The total amount wagered was $109,600, with a return of $107,545.20, resulting in a net loss of $2,054 and a Return on Investment (ROI) of -1.87%. This indicates that the market is highly efficient, and pre-game probabilities are accurately priced, leaving no simple arbitrage opportunity. In fact, blindly following the market would have been slightly less profitable than betting against it. However, a deeper analysis by team revealed significant differences. Certain teams consistently outperformed market expectations when they were favored to win: * Portland Trail Blazers (POR): 19% ROI * Philadelphia 76ers (PHI): 14% ROI * San Antonio Spurs (SAS): 12% ROI * Los Angeles Lakers (LAL): 11% ROI * Charlotte Hornets (CHA): 9% ROI In contrast, the market was highly efficient for the top-performing teams, offering minimal returns (e.g., Boston Celtics ROI: 4%, Denver Nuggets ROI: -5%). Results for the weakest teams were too inconsistent due to small sample sizes. The key finding is that team-specific factors, rather than the probability percentage itself, drive potential value, making a one-size-fits-all strategy ineffective.

Odaily星球日报33m ago

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

Odaily星球日报33m ago

Are Altcoins Soaring? Is the Bull Market Back?

Recent days have seen significant volatility in altcoins while Bitcoin remained relatively stable. Some low-market-cap tokens, with circulations under $20 million, surged by several hundred percent within days—without fundamental improvements, ecosystem breakthroughs, or new institutional inflows. This is not a true altseason. The Altseason Index stands at 34, and Bitcoin dominance is at 58.5%, indicating the market is still in a "Bitcoin season." The altcoin market cap has shrunk by ~40% since its peak in December 2024, falling to around $700 billion. This severe decline has made it cheaper for large holders to accumulate significant portions of circulating supply, enabling price manipulation. A case in point is SIREN, where a single entity allegedly controlled up to 88% of the circulating supply. Such concentration allows a small group to dictate price movements. Additionally, deeply negative funding rates (as low as -0.3% every 8 hours, annualized to -328%) force short sellers to pay high fees, accelerating liquidations and further fueling upward price spikes. On-chain activity, like a 97% weekly increase in BSC DEX volume, suggests excitement, but it is largely driven by existing capital, not new inflows. Institutional flows into altcoin ETFs (like those for Solana and XRP) have been weak or negative, indicating caution rather than rotation into altcoins. This rally is a signal of structural fragility, not broad bullish momentum. Until Bitcoin dominance falls significantly and new capital enters the altcoin space, these pumps are echoes of manipulation—not the return of a true bull market.

marsbit1h ago

Are Altcoins Soaring? Is the Bull Market Back?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片