Bankless:再质押项目ether.fi双倍积分策略与交互指南

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-01-16Last updated on 2024-01-16

Abstract

ether.fi能有效地将本地再质押流程转化为一个单一的存款过程。

原文标题:《Getting Started with ether.fi Staking》

原文作者:William M. Peaster,Bankless

原文编译:Luccy,BlockBeats

编者按:近期,LST 和 LRT 叙事在以太坊风靡一时,Bankless 高级作家、 Metaversal 创建者 William M. Peaster 撰文阐述了再质押成为加密货币领域的主流趋势的原因,并并通过案例分析深入了解其中的机遇和挑战。William M. Peaster 主要提到了一项新的再质押项目 ether.fi,文章中详细阐述了 ether.fi 的双倍积分策略,积分有机会换取空投资格,BlockBeats 将原文编译如下:

最近,流动质押代币(LST)在以太坊周围风靡一时。

您听说过这里的大公司,例如 Lido (stETH)、Rocket Pool (rETH) 和 Coinbase (cbETH) – 这些 LST 让用户能够保持流动性并获得 ETH 质押奖励,而无需运行自己的验证器设置。

一般承诺?将 ETH 存入以获取代表您存款的 LST,然后随心所欲地持有或使用 LST,与此同时,它会随着时间逐渐积累 ETH 的权益。

许多平台通过遵循这一模式崛起,但目前在 LST 领域,再质押这一技术正在引起极大的兴奋,它是由 EigenLayer 广泛推崇的一种方法。再质押利用 LST 存款来为希望获取外部安全基础设施的项目提供验证者服务的扩展。

Bankless:再质押项目ether.fi双倍积分策略与交互指南

这是一种双赢模式:存款人可以同时获得 ETH 的权益和来自利用 EigenLayer 的项目的验证收入,而这些项目则能够在不必建立自己的信任网络的情况下,采用以太坊的去中心化和安全性。

问题在哪里?在这个初期阶段,EigenLayer 设定了 LST 存款上限,迄今为止,每当上限提高时,限额都迅速达到。这种情况并不令人意外,因为目前对未来 EigenLayer 的空投存在着巨大的期待。

好消息是?有一个解决办法。EigenLayer 还提供本地再质押,即通过 EigenLayer 部署实际验证者的能力,令人感兴趣的是,这里没有存款上限。

更好的消息呢?有一些项目在这方面做得更简便,有效地将本地再质押流程转化为一个单一的存款过程。在这里需要注意的一个项目是 ether.fi。

Bankless:再质押项目ether.fi双倍积分策略与交互指南

在 2023 年推出的 ether.fi 创造了 eETH,这是一种通过 EigenLayer 本地再质押其底层 ETH 存款的 LST。除了权益奖励和在 DeFi 中使用 eETH 的可能性外,这种循环流动还使存款人能够同时获得 ether.fi 忠诚积分和 EigenLayer 再质押积分,两者都可能涉及到空投资格。

很有趣,对吧?

Bankless:再质押项目ether.fi双倍积分策略与交互指南

那么请注意,利用这个机会非常简单。您只需存入 ETH(最低 = 0.001 ETH)即可以 1: 1 的比例铸造 eETH,此时您的 eETH 余额将开始累积积分。流程如下所示:

· 前往 app.ether.fi

· 连接您的钱包

· 在 UI 中输入您想要的存款金额

· 点击「Stake」

· 用您的钱包签署权益交易

瞧,这就是使用 ether.fi 双倍积分策略所需的全部步骤。请记住,您可以通过同一个界面解质押并提取您的 ETH,只需点击界面中央的箭头按钮进入「提取」模式即可开始。

至于您的积分,您可以通过app.ether.fi/portfolio页面随时追踪您的 ether.fi 和 EigenLayer 分数。ether.fi 积分的计算公式是 ETH 质押量 x 1, 000 x 质押天数,例如,质押 1 ETH 一周将为您赚取 7, 000 积分。

无论加密货币领域接下来发生什么,再质押都会持续下去,所以不要沉迷于像 ether.fi 这样的「双重打击」再质押项目,在这些项目中,您可以通过单笔存款最大化您的回报。

原文链接

Related Reads

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit3h ago

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit3h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit6h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit6h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit8h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit8h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片