European Central Bank Shows It’s Serious About Enabling Digital Euro Offline Use

CoinDeskPolicyPublished on 2024-01-10Last updated on 2024-01-11

Abstract

The bank plans to allocate the lion’s share of its $1.3 billion contract budget for providers to work on enabling offline payments for a digital euro.

  • The European Central Bank last week sent out five calls for applications looking for providers to build out services around a potential digital euro.
  • More than half of the $1.3 billion contract budget is earmarked for offline payments development.
10

The European Central Bank (ECB) is offering a big chunk of cash to contractors who can enable offline payments for a retail digital euro.

In calls to find providers for a range of features, including risk management, information security and a user application, the ECB revealed plans to allocate as much as 1.2 billion euros ($1.3 billion) to potential contractors. More than half is earmarked for the offline payments service.

While around 100 economies worldwide are considering issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) as a way to sashay into the digital age and compete with private cryptocurrencies, among major jurisdictions, the 27-nation European Union is showing particular interest in preparing for one.

Advertisement
Advertisement

For the past few years, the ECB has been exploring issuing a digital version of the euro, the currency used by around 340 million people in 20 EU countries. In 2023, the bloc’s executive arm even proposed legislation for the digital currency, outlawing interest and large holdings, while promising offline payments from day 1.

Although officials at the ECB have repeatedly said the work on a digital euro is not a commitment to issue one, the calls for providers indicate promises made in the legislative proposals could be putting pressure on it to deliver.

Last week, alongside the application calls, the bank published an update on the development of a rulebook for the CBDC.

The $1.3 billion may seem like a lot of money, but what the ECB’s asking for is no mean feat, Jonas Gross, chairman of industry group the Digital Euro Association (DEA), said in an interview. For the ECB’s expectations, the budget seems reasonable, he said.

“My first reaction was, oh, man, this is really a lot of money,” said Gross. “But when you think about it's a contract that goes for a few years, where the ECB really expect the partners to deliver a product that’s … really kind of perfect to be implemented on the market.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Offline payments

More than half the budget, as much as 56%, is promised to potential providers of the offline component of the CBDC, Gross pointed out.

“This, I think, shows that this is serious, they want this, … you could also interpret it in that there are still some open questions, and there is just a lot of expertise from vendors required to get this on the street,” Gross said.

Enabling offline payments is widely viewed as one of the most important hurdles to overcome when it comes to implementing CBDCs. The ECB is planning two digital euros for retail payments, with one of them exclusively for offline use with holdings too held offline. Gross said he envisions one app that enables both versions, and says building such a product in a user-friendly way may be a challenge.

Choosing providers

Who the ECB ends up choosing to build out these services is also an open question. In 2022, the ECB was lambasted by EU lawmakers for choosing U.S. tech giant Amazon to create an e-commerce prototype for the digital euro.

Gross said the ECB might shy away from “exotic” choices and stick to traditional finance players with some presence in Europe this time.

Advertisement
Advertisement

These developments follow the ECB moving its digital euro project to a “preparation phase” in October to flesh out a rulebook and select providers to help build the platform. A decision on issuing a euro comes after legislation is finalized in the European Parliament, but with proposals facing political pushback, approval is not guaranteed.

Edited by Sheldon Reback.

Related Reads

Jensen Huang: Prompts are Becoming Obsolete, Loops are the New Paradigm

Jensen Huang, alongside AI leaders like Peter Norvig, Boris Cherny, and Andrew Ng, is advocating for a shift from "prompt engineering" to "loop engineering" as the new paradigm for AI development. Instead of manually crafting individual prompts, the focus is now on designing autonomous loops—systems where AI agents execute tasks, self-validate results, and iterate until completion without constant human oversight. A loop is a management framework that enables agents to operate independently. Key implementations are seen in Claude Code (with features like /loop, /goal, and /schedule) and OpenAI Codex, which employ multiple agents working in parallel within isolated environments. A core principle is the separation of roles: one agent (or model) performs the task, while an independent agent (or a smaller, separate model) validates the output to ensure objectivity. The article outlines a practical roadmap for implementing loops, starting with a "four-condition test" to assess suitability, building a minimal viable loop, and emphasizing critical pitfalls to avoid, such as lacking hard stop conditions or allowing loops to handle tasks requiring human judgment. This evolution is framed as the fourth major shift in AI interaction: from Prompt Engineering (crafting instructions) to Context Engineering (providing background information), then to Harness Engineering (building tool-enabled environments), and finally to Loop Engineering (creating self-sustaining systems). This progression reflects a consistent trend of increasing abstraction, moving human involvement from direct instruction to system design and rule-setting. The concept has academic roots in frameworks like ReAct, which formalized the "reason-act-observe" cycle. While loop engineering promises greater automation, experts caution about managing token costs and warn against outsourcing understanding—AI can assist, but deep problem comprehension remains essential.

marsbit35m ago

Jensen Huang: Prompts are Becoming Obsolete, Loops are the New Paradigm

marsbit35m ago

GPT Designs GPT

OpenAI has unveiled its first custom AI chip, Jalapeño, a move signaling a strategic shift beyond being a mere model company. While many see it as a challenge to NVIDIA, its core aim is to control the entire intelligent production pipeline—from models and chips to data centers and energy. The key driver is the evolving competitive landscape: model advantages are shrinking, while the computational gap in areas like cost-per-token, system throughput, and energy efficiency is becoming the true long-term barrier. Jalapeño is primarily an inference chip, targeting the massive and growing "inference tax"—the daily operational cost of generating tokens for services like ChatGPT and APIs. By designing its own hardware optimized for its specific workloads and future product roadmaps (even using AI to aid the chip design process), OpenAI aims to drastically reduce token generation costs and improve system efficiency. This creates a potential flywheel: better models help design better chips, which lower costs for running next-generation models, supporting more users and products, which in turn provides more data to refine future chips. The strategy mirrors Apple’s integrated approach, building a closed loop where hardware, software, and applications are co-optimized. In the long term, OpenAI is not trying to become the next NVIDIA (a supplier of "shovels" to all AI companies) but to own and operate the entire "mine"—selling the end product of intelligence itself. This move marks OpenAI's ambition to evolve from creating the smartest models to controlling the foundational infrastructure of AI production.

marsbit1h ago

GPT Designs GPT

marsbit1h ago

Ethereum Foundation Interim Executive Director Speaks Out: What Is Our Mission?

The Ethereum Foundation's core mission is to ensure Ethereum remains a truly permissionless, censorship-resistant, private, and open infrastructure for large-scale, sovereign coordination. The article clarifies the EF's focus and dismisses irrelevant objectives, such as pursuing institutional popularity or short-term speculation. Its core work centers on eliminating systemic weaknesses. This involves fortifying Ethereum across multiple layers—protocol, access, user, and institutional—against exploitation, control, or surveillance. Key initiatives include minimizing harmful MEV and preventing privileged control over transaction flow, making unconditional privacy a foundational default, ensuring staking remains permissionless and decentralized, and strengthening user-facing access points to uphold autonomy. Concurrently, the EF aims to seize strategic opportunities. These include leading the transition to post-quantum cryptography, achieving a fully verifiable protocol stack, establishing Ethereum as private digital cash, integrating user-owned AI agents with personal wallets, and demonstrating that trusted-neutral infrastructure can competitively handle disintermediated coordination at an institutional scale. The article also addresses recent organizational changes, stating that personnel departures were due to strategic realignment, role fit, or natural evolution. It clarifies the approach to spin-outs, emphasizing that external funding will be provided only for work critical to the EF's mission that reduces Ethereum's dependency without creating new risks or mission drift. Ultimately, the EF is committed to building an enduring, neutral system that reshapes global coordination, focusing relentlessly on the principles of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and sovereignty (CROP).

链捕手1h ago

Ethereum Foundation Interim Executive Director Speaks Out: What Is Our Mission?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片