$17.7M exits XRP ETFs – Is the 12% pullback just a blip?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-09Last updated on 2026-01-09

Abstract

Ripple's XRP experienced a significant 15% rally in early 2026, but recent on-chain data indicates a cooling-off period. Short-term holders have been taking profits, reducing their supply share and contributing to a 12-13% price pullback from recent highs. This activity led to approximately $400 million exiting Open Interest and marked the first-ever outflows from XRP ETFs, totaling $17.72 million. However, underlying fundamentals suggest potential strength. Ripple continues to secure strategic partnerships, including the acquisition of Slovexia to automate payments and a potential integration of XRPL with Amazon's AWS. These developments, coupled with a 30% surge in DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL) at the start of 2026, point toward real-world adoption and capital inflows. This fundamental growth may position the current price decline as a temporary blip rather than the start of a prolonged correction.

The impact of the 2025 cycle has kicked off earlier than expected this year.

Back in that cycle, FUD pushed risk assets below key levels, dragging prices back toward early-year lows into year-end. However, this pullback has delivered more than just a liquidity sweep that caught bears offside.

Instead, it has put real-use-case blockchains back in focus. In that sense, Ripple [XRP] fits the narrative perfectly, ripping nearly 15% in under 10 days during the early stages of the 2026 rally and firmly grabbing the spotlight.

That said, on-chain data suggests this thesis is now being tested.

From the chart, short-term XRP HODLers (1 week–1 month) have trimmed exposure, with their supply share sliding from 5.7% to 4.9% in just seven days, mirroring XRP’s almost 13% pullback from the $2.4 high.

Put simply, STHs are taking profits, pressuring supply. The result? Roughly $400 million was flushed from Open Interest (OI), while XRP ETFs saw their first-ever outflows, with $17.72 million exiting.

In short, XRP’s rally is cooling off, confirming that its 12% pullback isn’t a random blip. That said, the move raises the classic question: Is this just a temporary shakeout of weak hands, or the start of an extended correction?

On-chain data dips, but XRPL deals could turn XRP around

A key divergence is building under XRP, hinting at underlying strength.

Looking back at the 2025 cycle, XRP closed the year down 12%, but Ripple didn’t pause. Instead, it kept moving, locking in strategic partnerships aimed at capturing a slice of the trillion-dollar payments market.

Building on that momentum, Ripple has acquired Slovexia to automate payments, with around 50,000 daily transactions projected. Put simply, XRP will now be a payment option in their gateway for these transactions.

And it doesn’t stop there.

Amazon’s AWS is looking to partner with Ripple to integrate XRPL into its ecosystem. Consequently, XRP could become a payment option across a wide range of services, tapping into the big leagues of the tech industry.

In this context, XRP’s 15% “New Year” rally doesn’t look speculative.

Instead, with DeFi TVL up 30% in the first week of 2026, it’s an early sign that real adoption and capital inflows are driving momentum, making Ripple’s pullback feel like just a “blip” as fundamentals take center stage.


Final Thoughts

  • Ripple’s short-term holders are taking profits, trimming exposure, and causing minor supply pressure.
  • Strategic partnerships, along with a 30% DeFi TVL surge, signal real-world use and capital inflows, making the 12–13% pullback feel like just a blip.

Related Questions

QWhat was the amount of outflows from XRP ETFs mentioned in the article?

A$17.72 million exited XRP ETFs, marking their first-ever outflows.

QAccording to on-chain data, what did short-term XRP HODLers (1 week–1 month) do that contributed to the pullback?

AShort-term XRP HODLers trimmed their exposure, with their supply share sliding from 5.7% to 4.9% in just seven days, taking profits and creating supply pressure.

QWhat two major partnerships or acquisitions does the article highlight as potential catalysts to turn XRP's price around?

AThe article highlights Ripple's acquisition of Slovexia to automate payments and a potential partnership with Amazon's AWS to integrate the XRPL into its ecosystem.

QThe article suggests the recent 12-13% pullback might not be a random blip but could be due to what larger market phenomenon?

AThe pullback is presented as a potential result of profit-taking by short-term holders and a flush of Open Interest, mirroring a pattern from the previous cycle where FUD pushed risk assets below key levels.

QWhat key metric surged 30% in the first week of 2026, which the article cites as a sign of real adoption and capital inflows?

ADeFi Total Value Locked (TVL) surged by 30% in the first week of 2026.

Related Reads

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit28m ago

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit28m ago

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1h ago

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片