$17.7M exits XRP ETFs – Is the 12% pullback just a blip?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-09Last updated on 2026-01-09

Abstract

Ripple's XRP experienced a significant 15% rally in early 2026, but recent on-chain data indicates a cooling-off period. Short-term holders have been taking profits, reducing their supply share and contributing to a 12-13% price pullback from recent highs. This activity led to approximately $400 million exiting Open Interest and marked the first-ever outflows from XRP ETFs, totaling $17.72 million. However, underlying fundamentals suggest potential strength. Ripple continues to secure strategic partnerships, including the acquisition of Slovexia to automate payments and a potential integration of XRPL with Amazon's AWS. These developments, coupled with a 30% surge in DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL) at the start of 2026, point toward real-world adoption and capital inflows. This fundamental growth may position the current price decline as a temporary blip rather than the start of a prolonged correction.

The impact of the 2025 cycle has kicked off earlier than expected this year.

Back in that cycle, FUD pushed risk assets below key levels, dragging prices back toward early-year lows into year-end. However, this pullback has delivered more than just a liquidity sweep that caught bears offside.

Instead, it has put real-use-case blockchains back in focus. In that sense, Ripple [XRP] fits the narrative perfectly, ripping nearly 15% in under 10 days during the early stages of the 2026 rally and firmly grabbing the spotlight.

That said, on-chain data suggests this thesis is now being tested.

From the chart, short-term XRP HODLers (1 week–1 month) have trimmed exposure, with their supply share sliding from 5.7% to 4.9% in just seven days, mirroring XRP’s almost 13% pullback from the $2.4 high.

Put simply, STHs are taking profits, pressuring supply. The result? Roughly $400 million was flushed from Open Interest (OI), while XRP ETFs saw their first-ever outflows, with $17.72 million exiting.

In short, XRP’s rally is cooling off, confirming that its 12% pullback isn’t a random blip. That said, the move raises the classic question: Is this just a temporary shakeout of weak hands, or the start of an extended correction?

On-chain data dips, but XRPL deals could turn XRP around

A key divergence is building under XRP, hinting at underlying strength.

Looking back at the 2025 cycle, XRP closed the year down 12%, but Ripple didn’t pause. Instead, it kept moving, locking in strategic partnerships aimed at capturing a slice of the trillion-dollar payments market.

Building on that momentum, Ripple has acquired Slovexia to automate payments, with around 50,000 daily transactions projected. Put simply, XRP will now be a payment option in their gateway for these transactions.

And it doesn’t stop there.

Amazon’s AWS is looking to partner with Ripple to integrate XRPL into its ecosystem. Consequently, XRP could become a payment option across a wide range of services, tapping into the big leagues of the tech industry.

In this context, XRP’s 15% “New Year” rally doesn’t look speculative.

Instead, with DeFi TVL up 30% in the first week of 2026, it’s an early sign that real adoption and capital inflows are driving momentum, making Ripple’s pullback feel like just a “blip” as fundamentals take center stage.

Final Thoughts

Ripple’s short-term holders are taking profits, trimming exposure, and causing minor supply pressure.
Strategic partnerships, along with a 30% DeFi TVL surge, signal real-world use and capital inflows, making the 12–13% pullback feel like just a blip.

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit5m ago

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit5m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News9m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News9m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit16m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit16m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit25m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit25m ago

In Order to Buy Investigational Weight-Loss Drugs, a Group of Americans Learn to Use Bitcoin Payments

To purchase the experimental weight-loss drug retatrutide, Americans like Zach are turning to Bitcoin despite initial skepticism. Retatrutide, an unapproved triple-agonist from Eli Lilly, offers significant weight loss but is inaccessible through U.S. channels. Buying from domestic resellers costs around $3,600 annually, whereas Zach found a Chinese seller offering a year’s supply for $240—with Bitcoin as the only payment option. This price disparity led him to learn cryptocurrency for the transaction. Online sellers of such “research chemicals” or peptides often use Bitcoin because traditional payment systems avoid the regulatory and legal risks. Chainalysis data shows crypto payments to grey-market peptide sellers reached $32 million in Q1 2026, suggesting an annualized volume exceeding $100 million, though this remains a fraction of the estimated $1-3 billion black market. The trend intersects with communities like DeSciNYC, where events on peptides draw crowds interested in biohacking and longevity, indicating shared interests between crypto and wellness circles. However, potential FDA moves to legalize certain peptides could shift demand away from the black market and reduce the need for crypto payments.

marsbit27m ago

In Order to Buy Investigational Weight-Loss Drugs, a Group of Americans Learn to Use Bitcoin Payments