Terraform Labs' LUNA and MIR Tokens are Securities, Judge Rules

CoinDeskPolicyPublished on 2023-12-27Last updated on 2023-12-29

Abstract

A federal judge issued summary judgements siding with the SEC's arguments that Terraform had illegally sold unregistered crypto securities.

A U.S. federal judge ruled on Thursday that Terraform Labs, creator of the ill-fated Terra and Luna cryptocurrencies, violated federal securities laws when it sold its cryptocurrencies to the public.

Judge Jed Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in a summary judgment that Terraform Labs failed to register LUNA and MIR – another cryptocurrency in the Terra ecosystem – as securities.

10

The summary judgment could shape an eventual trial over Terraform's securities violations. Judge Rakoff denied both parties' efforts to exclude testimony from opposing expert witnesses who have studied the trading activity that led to UST's depegging in May 2022.

Advertisement
Advertisement

But the judge blocked two other defense witnesses, one of whom would have testified on activity in Terraform's custodial wallets, and the other who would have given the jury an overview of Terraform's crypto economy.

The ruling falls in line with the regulators' assertion that most cryptocurrencies ought to be classified as securities and fall under the agency's purview. The court's judgment only recognizes the SEC's right to oversee two cryptocurrencies, Luna and Mir, however.

The SEC sued Terraform Labs earlier this year, following a rash of similar complaints it filed against several other key players in the cryptocurrency industry. The lawsuit's filing came just months after the notorious depegging of Terraform Labs' algorithmic stablecoin UST, which plunged the crypto industry into a deep winter.

Edited by Danny Nelson.

Related Reads

Aave Founder Dismisses Reports Of Payward’s ‘70% Discount’ Stake Purchase

Aave founder Stani Kulechov has dismissed reports claiming that Kraken's parent company, Payward, was negotiating to purchase a 15% stake in Aave Group at a steep 70% discount. The reported deal proposed a $71 million investment at a $385 million valuation, which was framed as a significant discount compared to AAVE's fully diluted token valuation. Kulechov rejected this narrative, stating AAVE would not be sold at such a discount, and highlighted Aave's protocol revenue. The article clarifies the distinction between different entities within the Aave ecosystem—Aave Group, Aave Labs, Aave DAO, and AAVE token holders—noting that an equity discussion in a related company does not equate to selling the protocol or transferring DAO control. It underscores the sensitivity of major DeFi protocols to strategic investment rumors and the importance of accurate terminology to avoid misleading readers. While strategic discussions are common in the crypto sector, Kulechov specifically denied the discounted sale framing. The situation highlights that future developments should be monitored via official Aave channels, and market reactions may depend on whether token holders view the denial as value-supportive or focus on potential future distributions. The key takeaway is the founder's rejection of the 70% discount story, while leaving room for strategic partnerships under different terms.

bitcoinist25m ago

Aave Founder Dismisses Reports Of Payward’s ‘70% Discount’ Stake Purchase

bitcoinist25m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片