Astria EVM：成为Celestia生态系统活动中心的推动力

Odaily星球日报Published on 2023-12-22Last updated on 2023-12-22

Abstract

Astria EVM是一个由共享排序网络驱动的强大EVM Rollup。

Astria EVM：成为Celestia生态系统活动中心的推动力

随着区块链技术的不断演进，新的创新不断涌现，挑战现状，推动去中心化世界的可能性向前迈进。其中一个突破性的进展就是 Astria EVM，这是一个由共享排序网络驱动的强大 EVM Rollup，旨在成为 Celestia 生态系统内的活动中心。

Astria EVM 的动力：共享排序网络

在最近的发布中，Astria EVM 凭借共享排序网络的强大功能展现了自己的能力。这个网络是现代区块链技术的一个奇迹，提供了一个抗审查的、可靠的区块生产方法，承诺速度和可靠性。结合 Celestia 的基础设施，提供数据可用性，Astria EVM 成为了解决现有 EVM 面临的可扩展性、性能和去中心化挑战的解决方案。

EVM 已成为区块链时代的事实上的虚拟机，其在 Celestia 生态系统中的整合是一个战略举措，反映了该生态系统的雄心。通过将 Astria EVM 建立为活动中心，它有望促进模块化 Rollup 生态系统的增长，吸引 Astria 和外部生态系统的桥接资产。

开发和集成生态系统

Astria EVM 与 Dora 的多链搜索引擎的整合证明了其致力于提升链上交互的承诺。Dora 的平台作为一个可发现性层，嵌入链上交互，有望通过使区块链更易访问和用户友好来推动大规模采用。

对于热衷于探索 Astria EVM 潜力的开发者和爱好者，可通过 Astria 网络页面在 Dora 上访问该网络。开发者可以通过提供的 JSON RPC 端点连接，并使用 Faucet 进行测试。这种集成水平标志着一个包容的方法，Celestia 生态系统不仅仅是关于建设，还关于连接和增强整体区块链体验。

在 Astria EVM 上建设

Astria EVM 在 Dusknet-2 上的现场展示，利用 Celestia 的 Mocha 测试网，为开发者打开了一个充满可能性的世界。有了现成的基础设施和交互作为其核心功能，Astria EVM 邀请开发者贡献于一个繁荣的环境，这个环境是面向去中心化应用程序未来的。

有兴趣参与这一开创性旅程的开发者可以通过提供的表格联系。这种社区驱动的方法，重视合作和创新。Astria EVM 的文档提供了所有必要的细节，确保开发者清楚了解网络的功能和功能。

总结：Astria EVM 在区块链领域的先驱

Astria EVM 代表了区块链行业的一大步。通过结合共享排序网络的快速、抗审查能力和 Celestia 可靠的数据可用性，它提供了一个可扩展的、高性能的、去中心化的环境，用于 EVM Rollup。它的整合到 Dora 的搜索引擎，以及支持基础设施，不仅是作为一个工具，而是作为下一代区块链开发的灯塔。

随着区块链领域的持续扩张，Astria EVM 是如何创新解决方案可以改变我们与区块链技术的互动方式和感知的一个杰出例子。它立足于当前的区块链状态和去中心化、互联未来的巨大潜力之间的桥梁。

与 Astria EVM 社区互动

为了成为 Astria EVM 的开发的一部分，为 Celestia 生态系统做出贡献，开发者和区块链爱好者被鼓励参与该项目。通过积极参与、分享见解和在 Astria EVM 上建设，社区可以推动 Celestia 生态系统成为创新和活动的中心。

总之，Astria EVM 不仅仅是市场上的一个新产品，它是一种预示着将重新定义去中心化景观的演变的先兆。它在 Celestia 生态系统中的角色很明确 —— 成为推动模块化 Rollup 生态系统时代的活动中心，并确保它保持在区块链领域的先锋地位。

Related Reads

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit6m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit6m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手13m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手13m ago

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit48m ago

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit48m ago

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit54m ago

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit54m ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News59m ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News59m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片