一文速览 Web3 教育协议 EDU3：背景、构成与代币分配

长文源：foresightnewsPublished on 2023-11-06Last updated on 2023-11-07

Abstract

EDU3 由 DeSchool 团队开发，将于明年上线原生代币 EDU3，其中 50% 归属于社区。

EDU3 由 DeSchool 团队开发，将于明年上线原生代币 EDU3，其中 50% 归属于社区。


撰文：Peng SUN，Foresight News


近日，Web3 在线教育基础设施 DeSchool 团队正式发布其开发的 EDU3 协议白皮书 v1.0，其团队开发的所有产品均采用 EDU3 代币。与此同时，DeSchool 与链上简历 Booth 创始人 shawn 称明年将向社区与早期使用者空投 EDU3 代币。作为华人项目，EDU3 的明牌空投值得关注一下。今天，Foresight News 简要介绍一下 EDU3 协议是什么，它的代币分配与空投情况如何。


一、「协议，而非平台」


关于 EDU3 协议的起源，《DeSchool 协议化：Web3 原生教育基础设施》一文有过一段简要的描述：


2021 年，Caesar Lynch 离开硅谷的加密技术公司，思考如何改变 Web3 原生教育基础设施缺失的行业现状。在跟 SeeDAO 发起人白鱼多次探讨后，Caesar Lynch 和他的技术团队决定开发名为 EDU3 的教育协议，并把公司成立在香港。


基于该协议，DeSchool 团队相继开发了 deschool.app、链上简历 booth.ink、echo.world 等 DApp。如今，DeSchool 开发团队试图以 SDK 的形式将协议提供给社区，以简化 Web3 开发与使用门槛。据 DeSchool 团队称，通过 SDK 形式提供的 EDU3 协议支持开箱即用；帮助开发者做到零后端，极少资源投入就能快速上线 Web3 教育应用。


二、EDU3 协议构成与激励方式


目前，EDU3 协议在内容、身份、激励、NFT、声誉等方面的构成较为完备，包括：永存知识图谱、跨生态身份绑定、链上通用学历、共创教材 NFT、激励策展网络与教育社会信誉。这基本构成了教育的各个阶段：教材、知识获取、知识共享与传播、评价、学历认证、链上简历与人才招聘等。其生态参与者则包括质押者、生态开发者、内容创作者、策展者与内容消费者。


EDU3 整体架构都是围绕基于 Arweave 存储的「内容创作」，只有源源不断的优质新内容产出，才会带动策展、质押与消费，这样 DApp 也才会有活跃度。EDU3 的激励机制也较为简单，在时间维度上，生态参与者越早参与，那么获得的 EDU3 也就越多。


三、经济模型与空投详情


EDU3 协议原生代币为 EDU3，将在 2024 年底前进入市场流通，此前以积分形式发放。EDU3 可用于支付或抵扣存储 Arweave 的费用、流媒体与带宽费用、EDU3 教材共创 NFT 发放费用以及围绕内容创作与分发未来可能产生的费用等。在商业模式上，EDU3 协议的收入来自于手续费与内容销售。


EDU 总量为 10 亿枚，其中 25% 分配给团队（2.5 亿枚），15% 分配给投资人（1.5 亿枚），10% 分配给 SeeDAO（1 亿枚），50% 则分配给社区（5 亿枚）。在分配给社区的 50% 代币供应中，早期使用 EDU3 协议的 DApp 社区成员将获得其中 3% 的追溯空投奖励（3000 万枚），剩余 4.7 亿枚（47%）EDU 可通过「参与度挖矿」系统获得，用户可以通过加入 EDU3 生态 DApp 成为社区成员进入「参与度挖矿」系统。参与度挖矿以 M 天为一个轮次，用户可质押 EDU3、基于 EDU3 协议开发、创作、策展、消费等方式参与，每一轮参与得越早、活跃度越高，获得的代币也就会越多。


EDU3 协议将于 2024 年启动「参与度挖矿」，对用户来说还有充裕的时间参与。



参考资料：
《EDU3 协议白皮书 v1.0》
《DeSchool 协议化：Web3 原生教育基础设施》

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit13m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit13m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit23m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit23m ago

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist32m ago

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist32m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片