牛市将至?如何做好准备在疯狂牛市中驾驭叙事?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2023-11-02Last updated on 2023-11-02

Abstract

牛市比你想象的要“疯狂”。

原文作者:IGNAS | DEFI RESEARCH

原文编译:深潮 TechFlow

牛市将至?如何做好准备在疯狂牛市中驾驭叙事?

没那么快:这是新牛市的开始吗?

利率已经达到几十年来的最高水平,由于高通胀,人们难以支付账单,两场重大战争正在进行中,标普 500 指数下跌了 9% 。就在我写这篇文章的时候,甚至谷歌的股价也下跌了 10% 。

尽管宏观环境看起来熊市,比特币(BTC)持续在 34000 美元以上稳定了一个多星期。你现在一定将“Wall Street Cheat Sheet: The Psychology Of Market Cycles”看了一百多遍,现在看起来我们正在经历一场“怀疑”式的牛市。

四个多月前,Delphi Digital 发布了一份引人注目的市场研究报告,名为“催化剂叠加——叙事将推动基本面”?

这份报告是付费的,但我在 X 中写了一个摘要,解释了叙事如何发展,并确定了促使它们出现的催化剂。

牛市将至?如何做好准备在疯狂牛市中驾驭叙事?

Delphi 确定了三个重要的核心叙事:美联储的流动性周期、战争和新政府政策。他们解释了每一个如何在短期和长期内影响和将继续影响加密货币。这篇文章在准确性方面有预见性,许多负面事件现在正在转变为积极的事件。自那时以来:

  • 美国证券交易委员会在对抗 Grayscale(以及 XRP)的法庭上失败,为 Grayscale BTC 现货 ETF 铺平了道路,并使 Gary 在美国证券交易委员会的职位岌岌可危。在与币安、Coinbase 等的进一步失败中,将(希望)继续积累更多的火势,推动牛市。

  • 中国已经开始通过提供 1370 亿美元的预算支持来打击通货紧缩,加密货币历史上一直受益于由中国推动的流动性扩张。

  • Blackrock 等的比特币现货 ETF 获批准几乎是确定的。这将继续为加密货币领域带来急需的流动性。

尚不清楚美联储何时开始降低利率,但最糟糕的加息似乎已经过去。Arthur Hayes 认为,法定货币时代的结束和人工智能的崛起将有助于加密货币的发展。

随着宏观催化剂的演化,它们与 2024 年 4 月的比特币减半完美契合。宏观周期的重复模式是为什么比特币如今如同过去一样走过了相似的轨迹。

牛市将至?如何做好准备在疯狂牛市中驾驭叙事?

那么,这是牛市的开始吗?我相信是的。

但即使我错了,我可以等待任何下跌,继续学习和研究加密货币,为未来的牛市做好准备。我不能坐在一边,错过了疯狂的牛市。

牛市比你想象的要“疯狂”

Inverse Finance($INV)只是上一轮疯狂牛市的一个例子。然而,INV 的推出始于 YFI 代币。

yEarn 收益聚合器仅由 Andre Cronje 一人创立,它需要我们所称的“治理”:对设置费用、规则等进行维护和决策。

因此,他们发布了 YFI,“一个完全没有价值的 0 供应代币”。

“我们再次强调,它没有任何金融价值。没有预挖,没有出售,不可以购买,不会在 Uniswap 上出现,没有拍卖。我们一个都没有。”

——YFI 博客

任何人都可以在 Curve 等协议上提供流动性(据我所知),并免费获得 YFI。我提供了流动性,让我惊讶的是,我获得了 1000% 的年化收益率!

我无法理解一个看似“无价值”的代币如何能以每个代币数千美元的价格交易。 Twitter 上的加密货币话题充满了关于 YFI 价格的猜测,从 0 美元到 100 万美元不等。但 YFI 是一个全新的概念,我们传统的投资框架并不适用。YFI 彻底改变了我们对代币发布的理解。

最终,我以每个 YFI 约 3000 美元的价格出售了我的 YFI,几个月后,它的价格飙升至 90000 美元。这是我错过的 2900% 的潜在收益。我当时没有准备好市场可能变得多么疯狂。

从那以后,我始终保持开放的思维,对那些最让我困惑的事情保持开放的态度。这些事情可能会消失,也可能彻底改变行业的动态。DeFi 和 NFT 是这方面的重要例子,它们诞生了一代富有的 Degen,就像早期的 BTC 和 ETH 买家一样。

YFI 只是七个改变了我的理解和代币经济动态的代币之一。其他六个是 AMPL、OHM、COMP、CRV、NXM 和 SNX。

但所有这些代币都有疯狂的故事和有价值的教训。Olympus DAO,一个四位数年化率的庞氏骗局,只要没有人出售——(3.3),就可以将 OHM 的市值膨胀到 43 亿美元!相比之下,这已经超过了 AVAX 现在的市值。

一切都很顺利,直到庞氏骗局崩溃。

Olympus PTSD 导致我不喜欢 Friend Tech 3.3 游戏。不要天真地被新的营销技巧所迷惑(Olympus 应该是 DeFi 2.0)。在上涨途中,至少要卖出部分利润。

牛市将至?如何做好准备在疯狂牛市中驾驭叙事?

当牛市回来时,将出现更多的牛市 Meme、WAGMI 的呼声、承诺更大的新庞氏计划,你会看到一些 degen 赚得非常丰厚的故事。简而言之,我们将变得鲁莽,牛市会比你想象的更疯狂。

牛市将至?如何做好准备在疯狂牛市中驾驭叙事?

我们需要谨慎,但不要过于谨慎,以免错过“千载难逢”的机会。我们需要调整思维,但保持冷静说起来容易做起来难。

如何在即将到来的疯狂牛市中驾驭叙事

在加密领域,总会有一个牛市。即使在这场熊市中,我们也有 PEPE 突然出现,最近还有 SocialFi 的崛起。

一个人如何知道从哪里寻找新叙事的早期线索?我在上面提到的 Delphi 文章分享了为什么叙事很重要以及它们如何形成。

叙事至关重要,因为它们帮助我们理解这个复杂、令人生畏和看似随机的世界。当明确的沟通不可能时,我们依赖共享的知识、常识和社会规范来做决策。这些决策通常依赖于突出的线索,被称为谢林点。

“两个人分别面对着一列数字[ 2 , 5 , 9 , 25 , 69 , 73 , 82 , 96 , 100 , 126 , 150 ],并且如果他们分别选择相同的数字,他们将获得奖励。如果这两个人是数学家,他们很可能会选择 2 ——唯一的偶数质数。非数学家很可能会选择 100 ——这个数字对于数学家来说并不比其他两个平方数独特。文盲可能会因为它的特殊对称性而选择 69 ——对于那些对数字感兴趣而不是数学的人来说,这可能出于不同的原因。”

——Delphi Digital.

加密 Degen 们很可能会聚集在 69 这个数字上,出于 meme 的原因,你认为比特币的历史最高价是 69000 美元是巧合吗?

换句话说,决策多样性至关重要;它推动了市场。尽管人们受情感和故事的驱使,但市场通过集体共识和叙事繁荣。这些叙事帮助我们理解周围似乎随机发生的事件。

PEPE 成功地吸引了一群无聊但渴望获利的加密社区的想象力。在没有其他重大事件发生的市场中,PEPE 令人着迷的故事使它崭露头角,而与 Doge 和 Shiba Inu 等竞争对手相比,市值较小的优势真的有助于鼓舞士气。

但熊市很棘手,因为这些机会很少且往往短暂。牛市中,多个叙事同时出现,因此机会丰富。而且事情会比你想象的要疯狂。

我的建议是要保持开放的思维,尝试那些最让你困惑的新事物,研究它们,永远不要一次性全部出售你获得的新代币。即使那些受到批评或负面看法的代币也值得探索。挑战现状的新想法常常会引发老一代的不安感。

这正是比特币对传统金融(TradFi)所做的事情,也是 Ordinals 对比特币极端主义者正在进行的事情。比特币极端主义者对 Ordinals 的批评是我看好它的原因之一。这表明即使他们也认识到其重要性,并认为它值得关注。

我相信加密市场奖励那些早期发现新兴叙事并保持开放思维以迅速适应新市场动态的人。即使表面上以基本面为驱动的“真实收益”代币最终也成为另一个待售叙事,我事实上在叙事出现(和下降)之前之后检查了“真实收益”代币的表现,以确认这一点。

有哪些牛市叙事

我曾经提到,叙事是由新的技术创新与引人入胜的叙事相结合而产生的。

其中之一是具有 Ordinals、Stacks 和 BitVM 的比特币 DeFi,旨在增强比特币智能合约功能而无需分叉。

但以下是我认为可以在牛市中爆发的几个叙事,得益于 1)技术创新和 2)货币(代币)生产能力。

  • 流动性再质押代币。

  • 人工智能与加密的融合。Arthur Hayes 推销 Filecoin(FIL)代币,因为需要存储,但 Arweave(AR)或更新的代币在合适的时机也可能崭露头角(两者表现不佳)。由于人工智能和其他技术的发展,机器对机器的小额支付叙事也有可能复兴。

  • 模块化与单片式区块链叙事。以太坊和 Cosmos 是模块化区块链的典型例子,尽管它们都有不同的实现愿景。Solana 在单片 L1 叙事中领先,时间将告诉哪种方法将主导未来十年。

  • 新一代去中心化交易所(DEX)。我密切关注近期从顶级风投公司筹集资金的项目。筹集资金的新 DeFi 协议中,大部分是 DEX。这并不令人意外,因为加密的主要用途之一就是投机。随着牛市中交易量的增加,DEX 和其代币的估值将上升。

  • 新一代 DeFi 稳定币。UST 的崩溃明显不是解决稳定币三难问题的最后尝试。据说 Liquity V2 将这样做,Frax V3 和 DAI 利用 RWA 来扩大规模。Ethena 提供了一种不同的(尽管不是去中心化的)可扩展性方法,我预计新的模型将继续提供新的致富方式。

然而,在每个牛市,通常会出现一种全新的叙事,可能会超越上述提到的每个叙事。这就像 Friend tech 与 SocialFi 似乎突然出现一样。

成功创建新叙事的协议和早期拥抱这些叙事的协议将成为下一个牛市的赢家。

在 Al Ries 和 Jack Trout 的书《营销的 22 条不变法则》中,他们提到了“领导力法则”。根据这一法则,让自己成为某人心目中的第一比让他们相信你的产是比第一个成功的产品要容易得多。

所以,所有这些将自己营销为更好的“Friend tech”的 SocialFi 分叉,只是在确立 FT 作为该类别的龙头方面帮了 FT 的忙。

请记住,当出现新叙事时,通常更明智的做法是押注原始协议而不是分叉。有一些例外,比如 Pancakeswap 和 Velodrome,大多数分叉承诺给你天堂,但最终只会把你带到地狱。

Celestia 是一个很好的例子,他们掌握了该书中介绍的另一种营销法则——“类别法则”。Celestia 并不是第一个投身模块化区块链叙事的协议,但与今天数百个 L2 专注于“执行层”的不同,他们专注于数据可用性层。你知道多少个 DA 解决方案?

有些分叉实际上在短期内表现出色,因此完全避免它们可能会错失(短期)机会。

最后

每个人的经验和教训都不同。这就是为什么在加密中有一句谚语,你需要经历 3 个周期才能在加密中“成功”:一个用于学习,一个用于赚钱,一个用于财富自由。

无论市场变得多么疯狂,都要确保它不会彻底摧毁你。你可以在一个协议上失去 10 %、 20 %甚至 50 %的净值,但你如果亏完了就没有了机会了。

加密市场充满了 Nassim Taleb 所谓的“Fat Tails”分布事件。这些极端事件频繁发生,但我们无法预测它们。FTXCelsiusTerra 等曾经是上一次牛市中的主要参与者,但它们现在都令人唏嘘。

因此,为迎接前进的疯狂牛市,同时也要为最坏的情况做好准备。风险管理听起来很无聊,直到你失去了钱。以美元计算,我最大的损失发生在 Terra 崩溃时的 Osmosis OSMO/UST 池上。由于有两周的解锁期,我无法撤出 LP,所以从那以后,我不再将我的“稳定币”与时间锁定。

因此,即使市场变得比我们预期的更加疯狂,这也不是我们自己变得疯狂和愚蠢的借口。学习、做好准备、享受乐趣!

Related Reads

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit9m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit9m ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit14m ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit14m ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit20m ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit20m ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit20m ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit20m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit36m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit36m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片