FTX审判做结案陈词，SBF或面临115年监禁

Odaily星球日报Published on 2023-11-02Last updated on 2023-11-02

Abstract

检方：这明显是欺诈；辩方：SBF不是故意的

北京时间 11 月 1 日晚 21 时许，在旷日持久的 FTX 创始人 SBF 刑事欺诈案件审判中，检方与辩方终于进行了结案陈词。结案陈词是庭审过程的关键部分，对于法院的决定具有重大影响，因此律师通常会精心准备并努力说服陪审团或法官支持他们的立场。在双方结案陈词后，法院和陪审团需要耗费几天的时间来做出决定。

从 10 月 3 日正式开启审判以来，SBF 在法庭上多次使用「不清楚」「没记得说过」等说法。而检方也展示出各项证据及证人，以说服法官和 12 人的陪审团对 SBF 定罪。

相关阅读：《SBF 再次出庭为自己作证，审判案迈向终局》

SBF 试图强调，虽然他担任 FTX 首席执行官，但他并不总是了解公司运作方式。他将 Alamede 在 FTX 有几乎无限信贷额度的事归咎于前同事 Nishad Singh 和 Gary Wang。检方结案陈词：「这就是欺诈，简单明了」

11 月 1 日，检察官在结案陈词中声称 SBF 有欺诈和串谋犯欺诈的罪行。检察官 Nicolas Roos 指出：「这就是欺诈，简单明了。在 FTX 之前，就有 Alameda。」

Nicolas 表示，「被告推销清算引擎，称 FTX 是安全的。他告诉国会，抵押品必须放在平台本身上，而不仅仅是质押。但秘密规则允许 Alameda 借入数十亿美元而不存在被清算的风险。」

在检方陈述结案陈词的过程中，同时指出 SBF「失忆 140 次」，同时对核心问题撒谎、躲避。

相关阅读：《SBF 庭审现场：缺席的陪审团，以及「失忆」的主角》

SBF 说的最多的是「我不记得了」。据 WSJ 报道，SBF 在法庭作证表示，他不记得 2022 年曾通过 Signal 消息应用程序与他的高级副手讨论过关闭 Alameda Research 的事宜。当被问及他是否记得关于公司 130 亿美元如何失踪的对话时，他表示「我不记得了。」辩方律师一度「泪流满面」

辩方这边，则试图将 SBF 描绘成一位善意犯下「可怕错误」的企业家，否认他指导核心圈子进行政治捐款和风险投资，以及用客户资金购买豪华房地产的指控。在结案陈词的过程中，辩方律师还因情绪激动，一度「泪流满面」。

据 Cointelegraph 报道，SBF 辩护律师在说服陪审员相信 SBF 是无辜的一事方面面临着严峻的挑战，因为政府提供了大量证据，包括参与该案的官员和执法人员的证词。

FTX审判做结案陈词，SBF或面临115年监禁

在 SBF 代理律师 Mark S. Cohen 的结案陈词中，其要求法庭及陪审团认定 SBF 在经营 FTX 和 Alameda Research 期间始终「善意」行事，因此不能认定其犯有诈骗罪。

是「现实世界的沟通不畅」、「错误」和「延误」伤害了 FTX 和 Bankman-Fried 的加密帝国的其他成员，而不是故意欺诈。萨姆竭尽全力在新市场创办和经营两项价值数十亿美元的企业，有些决定结果很好，有些决定结果很糟糕。

值得注意的是，或许由于检方在辩方之前发表结案陈词，陪审团在检方发表结案陈词的环节「专注聆听」，而在辩方发表结案陈词的时候则「打哈欠」同时显得十分「疲惫」。

SBF 或面临 115 年监禁，最终结果将在数日内公布

本次审判，SBF 面临七项欺诈和共谋欺诈的指控，由 12 人组成的陪审团将在未来几天内决定他的命运。如果罪名成立，SBF 将在监狱服刑 115 年。

BlockBeats此前报道， 12 月 14 日，美国检察官发言人 Nicholas Biase 就已发言称，长达 13 页的起诉书中列出的指控可能会让 SBF 在监狱里待上几十年，SBF 最高将面临 115 年的监禁。

FTX 及 Alameda 相关地址近期共转出 1.7 亿美元

在法庭之外，FTX 的交易记录变得越发频繁。据 BlockBeats 统计，目前 FTX 相关的地址已转出总计价值约 1.7 亿美元的加密资产。 最近一笔转账发生在今日上午，据 Spot On Chain 监测，FTX/Alameda 在过去 7 小时内将价值 4600 万美元的 9 项资产转移到 Kraken、Binance 和 Coinbase。

相关阅读：《近7天，FTX卖了哪些币？》

继 25、 26、 27 日，FTX 及 Alameda 相关地址转出 5900 万美元资产之后，刚刚过去的几天中，FTX/Alameda 似乎又加快了操作步伐，至今已转出总计价值约 1.275 亿美元的加密资产。

FTX审判做结案陈词，SBF或面临115年监禁

Related Reads

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit11m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit11m ago

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist20m ago

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist20m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片