Crypto executives hint the 'tide is turning’ on digital asset market regulation

FinboldPublished on 2022-04-15Last updated on 2022-04-15

Abstract

Despite the tough regulatory stance toward the fast-growing decentralized finance (DeFi), executives of major cryptocurrency platforms are not losing hope and are even optimistic about the future.

Despite the tough regulatory stance toward the fast-growing decentralized finance (DeFi), executives of major cryptocurrency platforms are not losing hope and are even optimistic about the future.
One of them is Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, the CEO of Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange. He has expressed his views while speaking to CNBC during the Paris Blockchain Week Summit, as the news network reported on April 15. 
In 2021, the regulators in the United Kingdom banned Zhao’s company from carrying out any regulated activity there. At the same time, the central bank of Singapore stated that Binance’s services could be in violation of the local laws, forcing the platform to limit its operations.
However, as he told CNBC:
“The tide is definitely turning.”
These words echo the sentiment he expressed in his speech opening the summit on April 13, saying that regulatory discussions concerning crypto have moved from “negative” to “positive.”
Zhao’s views are shared by other important figures in the industry, including Nicolas Cary, the co-founder of crypto wallet maker Blockchain.com. Talking to CNBC, Cary said that:
“The regulatory landscape around the world is coming up to speed quickly.” 
Entering the regulatory framework
Indeed, although the Chinese authorities have made it clear they didn’t want anything to do with crypto, Great Britain and the United States are planning to bring the budding market under regulatory control, as they seek to become leaders in crypto innovation and investment.
In line with this stance, the U.K. government has recently announced plans to recognize stablecoins as a valid form of payment. At the same time, the country’s Finance Minister Rishi Sunak has asked the Royal Mint to create a non-fungible token (NFT), which will be issued by the summer.
As Cary sees it:
“The U.K. could be a dark horse in this whole situation. Post-Brexit, they sort of have a policy decision to make and a strategy decision to make. Do they rebuild Brussels in London, or do they become the Singapore of the West, invite all this innovation, all this technology and all this wealth generation and really own the future of the Web?”
France, the host of the Paris Blockchain Week Summit, is another country mentioned in a positive context. Namely, Zhao considers it “very progressive and very welcoming towards cryptocurrencies,” as well as “far more advanced in their understanding.”
Commenting on the authorities’ cautiousness regarding the ‘dark side’ of the industry, including money laundering and other illegal transactions, the co-founder of Tezos (XTZ), Arthur Breitman, has said that:
“I think they’re starting to take it seriously [but] I don’t think they’re getting a warm and fuzzy feeling about it. Naturally, they are going to have a conservative bias.”
Some experiences differ
That said, some crypto executives have had a bitter experience with financial regulators recently, including the CEO of Ripple, Brad Garlinghouse, whose company is in the middle of a legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
He said:
“When I give advice to entrepreneurs that are thinking about building a crypto or blockchain company, I tell them do not incorporate in the United States. The lack of clarity and a lack of certainty means that you are at risk for the exact kind of lawsuit the SEC brought against us.”
Notably, the SEC is accusing the firm of illegally selling over $1 billion worth of the XRP token between 2013 and 2020.

Related Reads

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbit18m ago

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbit18m ago

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbit23m ago

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbit23m ago

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbit24m ago

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbit24m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片