长推:阴霾笼罩下,浅谈Curve护城河

MarsBitPublished on 2023-08-04Last updated on 2023-08-04

Abstract

Curve是典型的“用时间换空间”,核心中的核心是CRV的价格。

注:原文来自@sun_xinjin发布长推。
Curve的护城河。
1)冠绝Web3的“邪教”(非贬义)社区:中英文全方位覆盖,战斗力极强,有种在知乎上看曹丰泽李建秋等人的感觉,“Curve必赢”不是跟你开玩笑。
2)币圈最天才的Tokenomics设计:且最有影响力,(3,3)在它跟前都是弟弟。VE大法好,不仅自己好,还能基于VE构建一个生态系统(虽然被诟病是套娃,但确实能解决问题,且很飞轮)
3)平衡“CRV Hodler,LP,项目方,交易者”利益:CRV是实实在在分红的,虽然需要你去质押成veCRV或者是换成cvxCRV等,一方面是交易费,另一方面是贿赂费;LP是有CRV排放的, APY更高(取决于CRV价格池子的排放量);项目方买或者租“流动性”,是能看到一些效果的,也能打开一些“应用场景“(不要问,问就是挖矿);交易者,也能有更好的交易体验(虽然有的时候走聚合器更好)。uniswap达不到这种平衡程度。
Curve是典型的“用时间换空间”,核心中的核心是CRV的价格。 CRV的价格除了靠魔改tokenomics,社区大户等续命,更需要实在的收入,所以你会看到以crvUSD为首的探索:提高整个协议剔除掉CRV排放后的“APY”。
上文中的“你“无任何指向,本人对uni和crv持中立态度。
附转推文👇(作者:@thecryptoskanda
道理没错,然而真正的问题是:Curve的叙事已经破功了。
Curve的护城河其实是个meme,这个meme来自:
1. 稳定币Swap TVL和交易量第一的基础设施地位
2. 基于CRV的贿赂系统(ponzi界的tbill)
CRV本质上是一个拥有超长锁仓期ponzi机制的矿币。不论因为什么出安全事故,结果都是一样的:大量TVL因此出逃,交易量锐减,更多的稳定币交易向Uniswap迁移。当CRV出现暴跌到一个威胁其“ponzi界Tbill”地位的时候,有什么理由这个叙事不被证伪,CRV不死亡螺旋。
之前哪位Curve教徒跟我说,Curve是币圈央行,那么现在就是央行爆雷时刻。除非“周小川”们给出市场足够信心,否则这就是Curve的“津巴布韦时刻”。
现在还在为CRV护航的大V们,麻烦把自己在Curve deposit的tx id发一下,或者发一下你们持有CRV的地址。证明你们是在用行动撑CRV。

Related Reads

Hubei State-Owned Assets Achieve the Largest Return in History

After years of anticipation, Yangtze Memory Holdings Co., Ltd. (YMTC) has filed for an IPO on Shanghai's STAR Market, seeking to raise 33 billion yuan—the largest offering in the board's history. This move follows the recent listing of its peer, ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), which reached a market valuation exceeding 4 trillion yuan. Dubbed the "twin stars of domestic memory," both companies, founded in 2016 in Hefei and Wuhan respectively, symbolize China's push for semiconductor self-sufficiency. YMTC's journey began with its predecessor, Wuhan Xinxin, established in 2006. Backed by substantial state investment from Hubei and Wuhan, it evolved into a national memory base. The company achieved key technological breakthroughs, and now ranks as the world's third-largest and China's top NAND Flash manufacturer by sales. Its recent financials are strong, with Q1 2026 revenue of 47.04 billion yuan and net profit of 33.38 billion yuan. Post-IPO, its market value is widely expected to surpass 1 trillion yuan. The potential windfall highlights the success of long-term, patient capital from Hubei's state-owned entities. Key shareholders like Hubei Changsheng, Xintech, and government-backed funds have supported YMTC through years of development. Their collective stake could be worth hundreds of billions after the listing. This model mirrors other successes in Wuhan, such as Huagong Tech, where local state investment during a low point later yielded massive returns. The story reflects a broader national trend of regional transformation through strategic, high-tech investments. Hefei's bet on CXMT, now worth over 3.7 trillion yuan, propelled the city's A-share market cap to 4th nationally, showcasing how a major firm can reshape an entire local industry ecosystem. Similarly, Wuhan's photoelectronics cluster, now worth over 850 billion yuan, aims to become a world-class hub. The takeaway is clear: in the reshuffling of Chinese cities, patient, courageous state investment in core technologies—from memory chips to advanced manufacturing—is proving to be a decisive factor, turning long-term visions into economic reality.

marsbit31m ago

Hubei State-Owned Assets Achieve the Largest Return in History

marsbit31m ago

The Myth of AI Investment Collapses

"The AI Investment Myth Bursts: The Swift Collapse of a $45 Billion Fund The high-flying hedge fund Situational Awareness (SA), founded by 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner, neared total collapse in late July. Once a Wall Street darling, the fund saw its assets under management rocket from $1.5 billion to $45 billion in under a year, driven by a massively leveraged bet on the AI boom. Its core strategy was a 'Texas hedge'—simultaneously buying stocks seen as AI beneficiaries (like chipmakers) and shorting those deemed AI victims (like certain software firms). In reality, both sides of this trade were dependent on unbroken market confidence in AI. This strategy generated staggering returns, peaking at 439% year-to-date. However, it concealed extreme concentration, high leverage (reportedly 3-to-1), and liquidity risks from illiquid private holdings like Anthropic. When semiconductor stocks corrected sharply in late July, SA's long positions plummeted. Simultaneously, its short bets failed as 'AI victim' stocks rose, causing losses on both sides. The fund faced immediate, massive margin calls. With minutes to spare before a forced liquidation by its prime brokers, SA sold its entire public market portfolio at a discount to Citadel on July 30, narrowly avoiding a market-wide cascade. The fund's value crashed from $45 billion to roughly $10 billion (excluding its remaining Anthropic stake). The episode exposes the systemic risks embedded in the frenzied, highly leveraged chase for AI returns. It serves as a stark reminder of the old Wall Street adage: markets can stay irrational longer than investors can stay solvent. The crisis shifts focus from Aschenbrenner's AI predictions to whether capital markets will continue ignoring such dangerous concentration and leverage in pursuit of the next 'sure thing' narrative."

marsbit32m ago

The Myth of AI Investment Collapses

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片