比特币与黄金和纳斯达克的相关性

CRYPTO BrefingPublished on 2023-06-26Last updated on 2023-06-26

Abstract

任何特定的相关性都可能被打破,从而使投资策略面临风险。

任何特定的相关性都可能被打破,从而使投资策略面临风险。

2022 年和 2023 年初,比特币与科技股(纳斯达克)同步交易。然而,自2023年3月Silvergate、Signature Bank和Silicon Valley Bank倒闭以来,黄金和比特币的价格都上涨了。同时,相关性创历史新高。

这对加密资产具有相当大的影响。因为如果比特币被视为投机资产,它可以像科技股一样进行交易。然而,如果比特币是一种避险资产,那么与黄金的相关性似乎是合理的。

然而,值得注意的是,相关性可能会出现或消失。仅仅因为两种资产已经相关一段时间并不意味着它们将在市场上长期占据一席之地。当缩小更大的时间范围时,任何类型的相关性都可以被排除。

因此,让我们在一年的基础上一起测试这两种相关性,看看它们是否有任何好处!

今年迄今为止,比特币上涨了约 58%,从年初的 16,600 美元上涨到周中的 30,000 美元以上。在同一时间范围内,纳斯达克指数的涨幅稍慢一些,约为 36%(从 11,000 点升至超过 15,000 点),而黄金年初至今的涨幅略高于 7%。

来源:TradingView

根据90天相关系数,BTC目前与黄金呈正相关(0.58),与纳斯达克呈负相关(-0.65)。

但是,今年迄今为止,比特币与这两种资产都高度相关。具体来说,年初时与黄金的相关性非常熊市,而与纳斯达克的相关性则低于中性。

因此,可以说,多重相关性的存在表明,无论是避险相关性还是风险资产相关性,它们都不是永久性的。

值得注意的是,在过去 14 年里,比特币兑美元汇率上涨了数千万个百分点。很少有资产类别能够拥有类似的回报。其他资产也不具有相同水平的波动性,使得长期相关性的可能性更小。

来源:TradingView

迄今为止,黄金价格已从2009年初的800美元上涨至如今的1945美元,涨幅接近150%。

来源:TradingView

纳斯达克自2009年初以来已经增长了10多倍,利润超过1000%。利润不错,但与 2010 年 7 月至今比特币的 52,000,000% 相比还相去甚远。

来源:TradingView

概括来说,这里的要点是:

在其生命周期内增长超过 50,000,000% 的资产可能与许多其他事物无关。

比特币、黄金和纳斯达克之间的相关性通常在超过一两年的时间范围内无法看出。此外,它们之间的相关性会根据宏观经济状况和市场环境不断变化。

目前,投资者应该意识到任何特定的相关性都可能被打破,从而使投资策略面临风险。

Related Reads

Why is XRP in the red now after a 50% weekly surge?

XRP fell 2.2% over 24 hours after a 49.4% surge in the previous week, moving back into negative territory. The drop coincides with major banks advancing blockchain-based payment solutions that address the need for prefunding in cross-border transfers, potentially competing with XRP's use case. JPMorgan Chase expanded its blockchain settlement system, Kinexys, to eight currencies, allowing clients to move and exchange funds around the clock without needing a separate crypto asset. Similarly, Citigroup operates a round-the-clock USD clearing network and offers Citi Token Services for tokenized deposits, aiming to speed up payments while reducing the amount of capital required upfront. While its 90-second settlement is slower than XRP Ledger's 3-5 seconds, using cash already held in a regulated bank may be more critical for companies. Furthermore, SWIFT has facilitated interoperability between different bank-issued tokenized deposits without a common cryptocurrency. In a recent pilot, HSBC and Standard Chartered completed a cross-border transaction using SWIFT's ledger to coordinate and settle obligations between their separate token systems. SWIFT reports that 17 banks across six continents are preparing for real transactions using this model. These developments in traditional finance present alternative, bank-integrated pathways for instant, cross-border value transfer, potentially impacting the demand and price trajectory for XRP.

cryptonews.ru9m ago

Why is XRP in the red now after a 50% weekly surge?

cryptonews.ru9m ago

The Ambition of the OEM: Dissecting Leju Robot's External Investments to Understand the 'Ecosystem Positioning' Battle in the Humanoid Robot Track

Leju Robotics, a leading humanoid robot manufacturer from China, is aggressively building an industrial ecosystem through strategic investments as it pursues a public listing. Founded in 2016 and known for its "Kuavo" robot, Leju saw its revenue surge to 258 million yuan in 2025, though it remains unprofitable. Its IPO plan, submitted in May 2026, outlines a strategy focused on cost reduction and full-stack capability development. Analysis of Leju's 13 disclosed investments reveals a three-pronged approach to securing its value chain. First, it targets core components like precision actuators (e.g., Lingxinqiaoshou), joint modules, and motors to control costs and supply. Second, it invests in software and AI layers, including companies working on foundational models and embodied intelligence datasets, to develop an independent "brain" while maintaining partnerships with giants like Huawei. Third, it forms alliances with firms in logistics and service robotics to transform from a hardware seller into a solution provider for real-world applications. While this investment network aims to create a competitive moat and support Leju's industrialization story, risks persist. The company faces ongoing losses, declining gross margins, and potential industry price wars. Many investments are early-stage with long payback periods and unproven synergistic benefits. Leju's strategy exemplifies how humanoid robot players are moving beyond pure R&D to ecosystem competition, betting that controlling the "hard work" of the supply chain will be the ultimate barrier to entry.

marsbit21m ago

The Ambition of the OEM: Dissecting Leju Robot's External Investments to Understand the 'Ecosystem Positioning' Battle in the Humanoid Robot Track

marsbit21m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片