Economist Peter Schiff Says 'Nobody’s Money Is Safe in Any Bank' — Warns of Financial Crises, Depressions

newsbtcPublished on 2023-05-11Last updated on 2023-05-11

Abstract

Economist Peter Schiff expects a lot more banks to fail, warning that “nobody’s money is safe in any bank.” He stressed: “When the Fed sets interest rates too low and prints a lot of money … it unleashes massive inflation, creates tremendous economic imbalances that result in financial crises and depressions when the bubbles burst.”

Economist Peter Schiff Says 'Nobody’s Money Is Safe in Any Bank' — Warns of Financial Crises, Depressions

Economist Peter Schiff expects a lot more banks to fail, warning that “nobody’s money is safe in any bank.” He stressed: “When the Fed sets interest rates too low and prints a lot of money … it unleashes massive inflation, creates tremendous economic imbalances that result in financial crises and depressions when the bubbles burst.”

Peter Schiff on Inflation Tsunami, Financial Crises, Depressions, and Bank Failures

Economist and gold bug Peter Schiff discussed the U.S. banking crisis and where the U.S. economy is headed in an interview last week on One America News Network.

Citing “the mess that the Fed made by keeping interest rates so low for so long,” Schiff explained that it enabled banks to load up on “low yielding, overpriced long-term debt, treasuries, [and] mortgages.” Moreover, he stressed that the government and regulators push banks “into these securities with favorable accounting treatment for government securities or anything guaranteed by the U.S. government.” He warned:

A lot more banks are going to fail. This is just the reality.

Commenting on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) contemplating how they might tweak the coverage for regional banks after several major banks failed, Schiff suggested: “How about abolishing the FDIC and let the free market handle banking. We’d have a much more solid bank system if depositors knew that their deposits could be lost at a bank that was reckless and took a lot of risks, and then those banks would be under competitive pressure not to take those kinds of risks.”

Noting that the source of the U.S. banking crisis is that “We socialized the banking industry,” Schiff detailed: “We’ve also socialized interest rates because the Federal Reserve is like a Polit Bureau. They just pick an interest rate rather than allowing the market to discover the appropriate rate.” The economist opined:

When the Fed sets interest rates too low and prints a lot of money in order to make that possible, it unleashes massive inflation, creates tremendous economic imbalances that result in financial crises and depressions when the bubbles burst. That’s where we are right now.

Schiff added: “I think the Fed is going to have to unleash so much inflation to try to prop up all these banks, and the U.S. government, which is also insolvent. That is going to unleash runaway inflation. That is the real problem.” He cautioned:

Nobody’s money is safe in any bank, because even if your bank doesn’t fail, it’s going to be bailed out through inflation. So, you might not lose your money, but your money will definitely lose its purchasing power.

Regarding the Federal Reserve raising interest rates by 25 basis points at their latest Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, Schiff stated that it is not enough to bring down inflation but “it is enough to create more problems for the banks and anybody else that has debt that they have to service.”

He explained that a lot of companies and people, particularly those who own commercial real estate, took out short-term loans at very low rates a few years ago. As those loans mature, they cannot afford higher payments. “They have less revenue, and now their interest expenses are rising,” Schiff described. In addition, many companies that borrowed in the junk bond market are not going to be able to afford to service their debt at the new rates once these bonds mature, he noted, emphasizing:

So, the bulk of this financial crisis, which just got started, is in our future. We’re just at the tip of a huge iceberg right now.

Regarding where people should put their money, Schiff advised: “Get out of the dollar. Get out of banks, and get into something real, whether it’s gold, silver, foreign stocks. You have to look for a port in the storm because this is an inflation tsunami.”


Related Reads

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

Hiring in Crypto: Balancing Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent As the crypto industry grows, founders face the dilemma of whether to prioritize hiring professionals with blockchain experience or those with traditional tech backgrounds who can learn. The key is recognizing that crypto companies are still tech companies at their core and should apply proven hiring best practices. Crypto-native talent offers immediate productivity and is essential for roles involving high-stakes, specialized work like smart contract development, where errors can be catastrophic. However, traditional professionals from large-scale software companies bring valuable experience in scaling products, operational flexibility, and expertise in areas like fintech, UX, and security, which are crucial as crypto products target mainstream adoption. Recruiting requires tailored approaches. Some candidates may be hesitant due to crypto's volatility or complexity, while others are excited by its innovative potential. Assess candidates' motivations, curiosity, and alignment with the company's vision early. Emphasize the opportunity to shape technology's future and address financial incentives, such as token-based compensation, which can offer liquidity compared to traditional equity. Onboarding is critical. Identify knowledge gaps during hiring and design education programs, mentorship, knowledge-sharing sessions, and resources like blogs or courses to accelerate learning. Pairing new hires with experienced crypto professionals helps bridge gaps and fosters collaboration. Ultimately, successful teams blend both crypto-native and traditional talent, leveraging their strengths to drive innovation and growth.

marsbit1h ago

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

marsbit1h ago

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

On April 19, a major DeFi security breach occurred, resulting in the loss of approximately $292 million. The attack targeted Kelp DAO’s rsETH bridge contract built on LayerZero, with 116,500 rsETH stolen. The attacker initiated the exploit using funds from Tornado Cash and manipulated the LayerZero EndpointV2 contract to transfer the assets. Kelp DAO confirmed the incident and temporarily paused rsETH contracts across multiple networks while collaborating with security experts for investigation. Initial analysis suggests the root cause was a compromised private key on the source chain, with the contract secured by only a 1/1 validator set, making it vulnerable to a single malicious transaction. The attacker used the stolen rsETH as collateral on lending platforms—including Aave, Compound, and Euler—to borrow more liquid assets like WETH, accumulating over $236 million in debt. Aave alone accounted for $196 million of this amount. In response, Aave froze its rsETH markets and stated it would explore covering potential bad debt through its Umbrella safety module, which holds around $50 million in WETH. This incident follows another large exploit earlier in April, where Drift Protocol on Solana lost $280 million. The repeated high-value attacks raise concerns about DeFi security, even affecting major protocols like Aave. Users are advised to exercise caution, diversify holdings, and limit exposure to on-chain protocols until more robust security measures are established.

marsbit2h ago

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片