Can Bitcoin break out vs. tech stocks again? Nasdaq decoupling paints $100K target

cointelegraphPublished on 2022-02-20Last updated on 2022-02-20

Abstract

Bitcoin's growth has quickly outpaced Nasdaq's in the past ten years.

A potential decoupling scenario between Bitcoin (BTC) and the Nasdaq Composite can push BTC price to reach $100,000 within 24 months, according to Tuur Demeester, founder of Adamant Capital.

Bitcoin outperforms tech stocks

Demeester depicted Bitcoin's growing market valuation against the tech-heavy U.S. stock market index, highlighting its ability to break out every time after a period of strong consolidation. 

"It may do so again within the coming 24 months," he wrote, citing the attached chart below.

BTC/USD vs. Nasdaq Composite weekly price chart. Source: Tuur Demeester, StockCharts.com

BTC's price has grown from a mere $0.06 to as high as $69,000 more than a decade after its introduction to the market, as per data tracked by the BraveNewCoin Liquid Index for Bitcoin (BLX).

BTC/USD versus Nasdaq Composite monthly price chart. Source: TradingView

That amounted to around a 64.50 million percent increase in Bitcoin's price since 2010. In comparison, Nasdaq's returns in the same period come to be nearly 650% — from 20.99 points on June 22, 2020, to 171.54 as of Feb. 18, 2022. As a result, Bitcoin's market cap has grown to $755 billion compared to Nasdaq's $28.68 billion.

Will Bitcoin decouple from tech stocks again?

Bitcoin's history so far has witnessed multiple periods of its strong correlation with U.S. tech stocks. For instance, earlier this month, the cryptocurrency's correlation efficiency with Nasdaq reached 0.73, almost near its five-year high of 0.74 in 2020, as per data from Bloomberg.

Bitcoin and tech stocks price performance since. September 2017. Source: Bloomberg

BTC's price per token dropped from its record high of $69,000 to below $33,000 last month amid a selloff across broader risk-on markets. The decline was accompanied by the Federal Reserve's decision to aggressively raise benchmark rates against rising consumer prices, which reached their four-decade high in January 2022.

Matthew Sigel, head of digital assets research at VanEck Associates, anticipated Bitcoin to fall alongside Nasdaq and other U.S. stock indexes, albeit more severe. However, he notes that Bitcoin's volatility has been in a downtrend in recent years. In comparison, Nasdaq 100 has been exhibiting more standard deviation moves than its five-year average.

The outlook portrays that Bitcoin has been gradually improving to become a dependable safe-haven asset against rising inflation. As a result, its correlation with risk-on assets, such as tech stocks could decline. 

"It's correlated for now," said James Butterfill, head of research at data analytics firm CoinShares, told Bloomberg, adding that the cryptocurrency is "quite sensitive to rising interest rates" fears. He noted:

"But what happens in a situation where you have a policy mistake, i.e. the Fed hikes too aggressively, for instance, or they don't hike aggressively enough, and there's an inflation problem. That would actually probably be much more supportive of Bitcoin and less supportive for equities."

Additionally, Joey Krug, CEO of Pantera Capital — a crypto-focused hedge fund, anticipates the decoupling to happen in the "next number of weeks," noting that "crypto will begin to trade on its own."

That $100K BTC price target

Demeester cited Bitcoin's ability to consolidate around $50,000 despite reeling under the pressure of its correlation with Nasdaq as one of the primary reasons why it could embark on a run-up toward $100,000.

The price target came in line with what Goldman Sachs anticipated at the beginning of 2022. The investment giant, which manages $1.2 trillion worth of assets globally, noted that Bitcoin could reach $100,000 if it takes some part of the market share of gold, a traditional safe-haven asset. Today, Bitcoin's market cap is just under 6% of gold's.

Related Reads

GitHub Empire on the Brink of Collapse: Source Code Leak, 18-Year Veteran Leaves, Microsoft Loses 1.5 Billion Developers

GitHub is facing an unprecedented crisis, marked by a massive exodus of developers and severe operational failures. The tipping point came when Mitchell Hashimoto, creator of Ghostty and an 18-year GitHub user, publicly severed ties, citing persistent platform outages that made serious work impossible. This departure highlights a broader pattern of user frustration. The platform's instability has drawn complaints from major corporate clients like Citibank and Intel, forcing Microsoft to issue substantial service credits. A critical incident last month saw an accidentally triggered, unreleased feature cause widespread repository rollbacks, erasing recent code changes and pushing enterprises to migrate. Security has catastrophically breached. In May 2026, hackers infiltrated over 3,800 of GitHub's internal repositories via a poisoned VS Code extension installed by a developer, leading to the attempted sale of core source code for $50,000. This follows the discovery of a critical zero-day vulnerability in March that threatened access to millions of repositories. Internally, GitHub's autonomy has collapsed. After the resignation of CEO Thomas Dohmke in mid-2025, Microsoft eliminated the CEO role, folding GitHub into its CoreAI division under the unpopular leadership of Jay Parikh. This triggered a talent drain, with key executives and engineers leaving. A disruptive migration of GitHub's infrastructure to Azure servers, pushed by CTO Vladimir Fedorov, is blamed for the recurring outages. Competitively, GitHub Copilot is under "existential threat" from superior AI coding tools like Cursor (now owned by SpaceX) and Claude Code, which offer more advanced contextual coding and automation. Ironically, Microsoft's own engineers reportedly preferred Claude Code, forcing management to revoke licenses. Financially, GitHub is a loss leader. Despite Copilot surpassing 4.7 million paid users and $3 billion in annual revenue, the AI inference costs for free services massively outstrip subscription income, hurting Microsoft's cloud margins. The recent shift from a flat fee to a pay-as-you-go model for Copilot has further alienated developers. The core question for Microsoft is whether a centralized code repository remains essential in the AI agent era. The erosion of trust, developer culture, and platform reliability threatens the very ecosystem Microsoft spent decades building.

marsbit1h ago

GitHub Empire on the Brink of Collapse: Source Code Leak, 18-Year Veteran Leaves, Microsoft Loses 1.5 Billion Developers

marsbit1h ago

SEC Promotes Tokenized Stocks, Is the Traditional Finance Industry Starting to Worry?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is preparing to formally release an "innovation exemption" framework this week. This framework would allow third parties to tokenize U.S. stocks like Apple and Tesla without approval from the listed companies. The move, rooted in a deregulatory vision proposed by pro-crypto commissioners earlier this year, could accelerate the migration of traditional stock markets to blockchain. This development poses a structural threat of "fragmentation" to traditional finance. Core concerns are liquidity fragmentation—where trading volume disperses across multiple blockchains and platforms, leading to price disparities and reduced market efficiency—and revenue fragmentation—where trading fees and intermediary income shift away from domestic exchanges to overseas or competing platforms. The report compares the traditional stock market to a monopolistic "supermarket." Tokenization enables countless "street stalls" to operate outside this system, threatening the exchange's dominance, diluting liquidity for large orders, and slicing into revenue streams. Evidence of this capital fragmentation is already emerging. On the same day the SEC signaled the framework, decentralized platform Hyperliquid saw its RWA (real-world asset) open interest hit a record $2.6 billion, driven by demand for 24/7 on-chain trading of traditional assets. Traditional institutions face a dilemma: either collaborate to build tokenization infrastructure proactively or lobby regulators to block innovation. Regulators must balance controlling the pace of innovation with preventing domestic revenue from being captured by offshore platforms. Key future battles will revolve around defining shareholder rights for tokenized assets and regulating platforms that have grown in regulatory gray areas. In the digital asset era, inaction risks the permanent loss of long-held fee monopolies and financial leadership as capital continues to disperse.

marsbit1h ago

SEC Promotes Tokenized Stocks, Is the Traditional Finance Industry Starting to Worry?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片