随着 First Republic Bank 跌至历史最低点,加密货币及相关股票飙升

the block cryptoPublished on 2023-04-27Last updated on 2023-04-27

Abstract

比特币和以太币周三分别上涨了 9% 和 6%,随后在当天晚些时候回吐涨幅。两个代币都在关键阻力位徘徊; BTC 30,000 美元, ETH 2,000 美元。

加密货币和相关股票周三下午在纽约飙升,因为 First Republic Bank 的股价因美国政府打算远离银行业危机的报道而创下历史新低。

比特币和以太币周三分别上涨了 9% 和 6%,随后在当天晚些时候回吐涨幅。两个代币都在关键阻力位徘徊; BTC 30,000 美元, ETH 2,000 美元。

股市也保持上涨,科技和加密货币公司领涨。加密货币交易所Coinbase在发布时上涨了 3%,而矿工Hut 8和商业智能公司MicroStrategy分别上涨了 10% 和 8%。大型科技股也上涨,Meta 上涨约 2%,亚马逊上涨近 3%。

First Republic Bank 在今年第一季度损失了 720 亿美元的存款,股价下跌 35% 至每股 4.78 美元的新低。抛售是由有关美国政府不会介入以帮助这家陷入困境的银行的报道引发的。

在整个银行业危机期间,股市历来较低,尤其是在最近的财报季之后,加上美联储即将做出的利率决定让交易员谨慎行事。但分析师表示,这可能是加密货币的完美风暴。

“具有讽刺意味的是,市场不确定性的回升应该对风险资产有利,因为投资者准备采取涉及流动性宽松的货币和流动性解决方案,”诺埃尔艾奇逊, Crypto is Macro Now的作者和 Genesis 的前市场洞察负责人,说。 “然而,在这方面存在预期超前的风险(或者,我应该说比平时更超前?)。这为比特币创造了一个有趣的局面。”

艾奇逊补充说,随着另一家传统金融机构的衰落,比特币作为传统银行系统替代品的投资理念现在有望大放异彩。

但是,其他人质疑比特币目前普遍接受的“风险资产”地位。

Amberdata 的分析师写道:“在BTC现货价格和相关波动率表面在 2022 年的交易方式之后,几乎已成定局的是, BTC是一种有可能发生剧烈崩盘的风险资产,类似于股票中的行为”在周三的一份报告中。 “回顾 2023 年第一季度的现货/成交量活动,我们可以很快地说,2022 年的活动并不是一成不变的先例。到目前为止,2023 年第一季度已经完全颠覆了 2022 年。”

Related Reads

From Sand to Chips: Hefei's Semiconductor Alchemy

From Sand to Chips: Hefei's Semiconductor "Alchemy" On July 27, 2026, a memory chip maker from Hefei made history by surpassing the market capitalization of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China on its Shanghai Stock Exchange debut. This marks the culmination of Hefei's two-decade industrial transformation, often summarized in three strategic leaps: "Screen, Chip, Vehicle." The journey began in 2008 with a bold investment in BOE, establishing China's first 6th-generation LCD panel line. The second leap was the "Project 506" in 2016, which gave birth to ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). With initial backing of 14.4 billion RMB from Hefei's state-owned investment platform, CXMT aimed to break into the global DRAM market, then over 95% controlled by three overseas giants. CXMT achieved a breakthrough in 2019 by producing China's first 8GB DDR4 DRAM chip, employing "generational leapfrog" R&D to catch up. After years of significant losses, the company turned profitable in 2025. A dramatic surge followed in 2026, driven by AI-driven demand and full capacity utilization, propelling CXMT to become the world's fourth-largest DRAM manufacturer. CXMT's success is not isolated. It anchors a dense, localized semiconductor ecosystem in Hefei. Within its vicinity are numerous supporting companies for equipment, materials, and packaging & testing. This cluster has fueled the regional economy, with Hefei's integrated circuit industry output growing over sevenfold between 2016 and 2025. The ripple effects extend beyond high-tech, revitalizing local communities with new businesses and services catering to the influx of workers. For individuals, Hefei offers competitive tech salaries at a significantly lower cost of living compared to major coastal cities, along with improved amenities and shorter commutes. Hefei's story demonstrates two decades of focused, long-term industrial policy, transforming the city from a provincial capital into a trillion-RMB GDP "Double Ten-Thousand" city (10 million people, 1 trillion RMB GDP). It shows how persistence in strategic sectors—turning sand into chips—can redefine a city's economic destiny.

marsbit3m ago

From Sand to Chips: Hefei's Semiconductor Alchemy

marsbit3m ago

Some Go Bankrupt, Others Go Shopping: The Counter-Cyclical Acquisition Logic of MoonPay, Circle, and Kraken

During a period of market stress where multiple crypto firms filed for bankruptcy or shut down, three major companies—MoonPay, Circle, and Kraken—pursued strategic acquisitions to strengthen their positions. Their divergent strategies reflect differing dependencies on key unresolved industry questions: which trading platforms, public blockchains, and stablecoins will ultimately dominate. MoonPay, operating at the fiat-crypto gateway, acquired Glide to expand its capabilities in token swaps, cross-chain operations, and financial reconciliation. Its business model is not tied to any single blockchain or stablecoin, allowing it to profit from user activity across various platforms. Circle, facing competitive pressure from the new Open Dollar Standard (OUSD) which could erode its core revenue from USDC reserve interest, acquired nearly a thousand patents from IBM. This move aims to build a competitive moat around USDC by enhancing its enterprise infrastructure, banking integrations, and compliance tools, shifting competition beyond mere interest yields. Kraken acquired Magic Labs' wallet-as-a-service business to deepen its integrated trading platform. The goal is to create a seamless "universal account" where users can trade crypto, stocks, and tokenized assets without leaving Kraken's ecosystem, while also bolstering its own layer-2 blockchain, Ink. These acquisitions highlight a trend where leading firms are consolidating core infrastructure not just for immediate profits, but to secure their futures amid ongoing industry consolidation and uncertainty. The competitive battleground is shifting from basic infrastructure access to superior product integration and ecosystem scale.

marsbit9m ago

Some Go Bankrupt, Others Go Shopping: The Counter-Cyclical Acquisition Logic of MoonPay, Circle, and Kraken

marsbit9m ago

The Permanent Underclass: No One Can Answer That 17-Year-Old Child

The article "The Permanent Underclass: No One Has an Answer for That 17-Year-Old" explores the concept of a "permanent underclass" emerging in a future where AI can perform most cognitive and physical labor. This theory, gaining traction in tech circles, suggests that as AI reduces the need for human workers, wages lose importance, and wealth increasingly flows to those who own AI models, compute, and data. The core issue is not temporary poverty but the potential breakdown of the traditional ladder of upward mobility—through labor, bargaining, and asset accumulation—making "underclass" a permanent status. The piece highlights a poignant question posed by researcher Jasmine Sun to AI lab personnel: What advice would you give a typical 17-year-old facing this future? Most had no answer, acknowledging the frightening transition ahead. However, while struggling to advise others, many in the AI field are securing their own positions, shifting from research or policy into labs to gain equity and stand on the "capital" side. This creates a vicious cycle: the more people believe labor's bargaining power is vanishing, the fewer work to rebuild it, accelerating its decline. Common personal survival strategies—learning AI skills, acquiring AI company equity, or pivoting to hands-on, in-person work—are analyzed. The author argues these are largely stopgaps, accessible mainly to the privileged, and may collectively undermine labor's overall position. The fundamental question shifts from "how not to fall behind" to "why must one's survival depend on being needed by capital?" The article concludes that the real solution is not individual adaptation but building a new societal "negotiating table"—new laws, forms of collective bargaining, or redistribution mechanisms (like taxes or public funds) to ensure the wealth AI creates is shared, especially with those displaced. It contrasts tentative institutional responses in China with a potential regulatory vacuum in the US, warning that without such frameworks being established before public frustration boils over, social unrest could follow. The 17-year-old’s dilemma underscores a systemic failure: the architects of this future are buying personal insurance but offering no collective answers.

marsbit18m ago

The Permanent Underclass: No One Can Answer That 17-Year-Old Child

marsbit18m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片