A look at Polygon ID, a new zk-proof based Web3 identity solution

cryptoslatePublished on 2022-03-31Last updated on 2022-03-31

Abstract

Polygon has just launched a new self-sovereign, zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) identity service. Called Polygon ID, the solution will enable users to verify their credentials and identity without ever revealing any personal information.

Polygon has just launched a new self-sovereign, zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) identity service. Called Polygon ID, the solution will enable users to verify their credentials and identity without ever revealing any personal information.

The solution aims to front-run the know-your-customer (KYC) regulation that will put incredible pressure on cryptocurrency companies around the globe.

A decentralized solution for KYC

Privacy and anonymity are the cornerstone of Web3 culture, representing everything its users hold dear. However, the huge growth seen in the Web3 market, driven by DeFi and NFT industries, has made it a target for regulators.

Market watchdogs around the globe have been racing to regulate the burgeoning industry and gain some semblance of control over its fast-growing market. This push for regulation translates into more stringent KYC requirements for companies operating in the Web3 sphere.

For crypto service providers, KYC means requiring their users to provide personally-identifying information such as passports, government-issued IDs, and biometric data. And while this relieves the pressure from regulators, it presents a slew of other problems, which include infringement of privacy and data leak risks.

This rising concern is what Polygon set out to address with its new ID solution. Polygon ID is one of the first such solutions to be powered by zero-knowledge (ZK) cryptography and represents the first milestone in Polygon’s ambitious roadmap for 2022.

The scalable blockchain platform has made zero-knowledge cryptography the centerpiece of its strategic vision for the next couple of years and has committed $1 billion to fund projects exploring and implementing the technology. Polygon ID, the company told CryptoSlate, is the latest product in this rapidly growing portfolio.

The ID solution will leverage the Iden3 protocol and the Circom ZK toolkit to provide a decentralized and self-sovereign platform for organizations, businesses, and users. It can be used to construct a variety of identity and trust services, including dAccess-as-a-Service, KYC and KYB attestation, as well as distribution channels.

For end-users, Polygon ID offers a decentralized way to KYC by enabling them to create a digital identity that can confirm their access rights without divulging their personal information. Polygon told CryptoSlate that this is a major step forward over traditional forms of digital identification as it removes all redundancy and middlemen from the process.

“Polygon ID is private by default, offers on-chain verification and permissionless attestation. There is nothing in the digital identity space now that ticks all these boxes,” said Mihailo Bjelic, Polygon’s co-founder. “It is also a great showcase for how zero knowledge proofs can help us create a better world.”

It also allows for the construction of new forms of reputation, opening up new possibilities for companies in the Web3 space. According to Polygon, its new ID solution can be used to provide decentralized credit scores for financial primitives and social payments in DeFi and enable a decentralized Sybil score that could create new decision-making and governance models in DAOs. Polygon ID could also be used to create player reputation profiles for Web3 games and facilitate private P2P communication and interactions on social applications.

Polygon’s convenient privacy set that’s set to be delivered this year

Based on the expressible claim standard, Polygon ID offers advantages over other forms of digital verification such as NFTs and verifiable credentials (VCs).

While NFTs have become ubiquitous in the Web3 world, they lack the privacy and cost-efficiency needed to make them an effective verification solution. Verifiable credentials, on the other hand, offer a higher degree of privacy as they enable selective disclosure and can support ZK cryptography. However, they’re limited when it comes to expressibility and composability—all features required when implementing verification solutions to complex applications.

And while zk-proof-based identity solutions offer significantly more benefits and applications, their complexity often stands in the way of mainstream adoption. Polygon ID has drastically reduced the complexity that comes with the use of Circom 2.0 and created a much more streamlined solution.

This enables the onboarding for developers and partners to take place via the ID client toolkit, which will come with native apps, SDKs, and white label solutions. On-chain private verification is done using zkProof Request Language, while identities can issue claims through the relayer, a unique model that reduces the cost of user claims.

To support all of these features, Polygon ID will be structured as a set of tools and platform services. The product portfolio will include the Polygon ID Wallet app, the Polygon ID platform, and the Polygon ID Connect, a public service platform that enables access integration across user wallets and apps.

By the end of the week, Polygon is set to deliver a proof of concept for the Polygon DAO. Next quarter, the market should see the public release of the ID Wallet app and the Polygon ID SDK, while the full release of the Polygon ID platform and the SDK for custom use cases should happen this fall.

Posted In: , DeFi, Technology, Web3

Related Reads

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit27m ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit27m ago

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbit2h ago

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbit2h ago

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

Intel CEO Chen Liwu outlines a bold vision for the company's transformation in a podcast interview, targeting a "10x return in 5-10 years." He emphasizes a strategic shift beyond traditional process node scaling, focusing on advanced packaging (like EMIB), new materials (glass substrates, GaN, SiC, InP, synthetic diamond), and system-level integration. Key to this is Intel's foundry business, where he prioritizes building trust through superior yield, defect density, and cycle times. Chen sees strong CPU demand resurgence driven by agent AI and inference workloads. He details the Terafab collaboration with Elon Musk to address semiconductor infrastructure gaps and stresses the strategic importance of U.S.-based advanced manufacturing. Acknowledging Intel is still in the "crawl" phase of his crawl-walk-run framework, Chen believes the company's full potential—extending from its PC base into edge computing and physical AI—will become apparent by 2030-2032.

marsbit2h ago

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

marsbit2h ago

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit2h ago

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit2h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit4h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片