Can you understand the FUD token?

MirrorPublished on 2023-02-06Last updated on 2023-02-09

Abstract

Huobi launched the FUD token on February 5th, and it's currently priced at over $50. So what is FUD?

Huobi launched the FUD token on February 5th, and it's currently priced at over $50. So what is FUD?

·

What are DebtDAO and FUD?

FUD is not Fear, Uncertainty, or Doubt, as you often hear, but FTX Users' Debt, an FTX debt token issued by DebtDAO. The FTX exchange was mismanaged on November 11, 2022, leaving it with massive debts.

DebtDAO uses decentralized agreements to provide debt liquidity to the debt market and is committed to building the best debt platform with the lowest price in the whole network, with the ultimate purpose of promoting on-chain debt financing and providing funds convenience for lenders and borrowers. FUD is the first token authorized by FTX creditors to be issued by DebtDAO and is a bond token for the highest quality of all FTX debt.

·

FUD release rules

FTX's debt amounts to between $20m and $100m, DebtDAO confirmed through contracts with FTX's bondholders. And the creditor entrusted DebtDAO to sell this debt at a discount, which was divided into several issuance stages:

1. Early bird stage. The first issue of 1FUD=1 USD, the initial issue and circulation of FUD is 20 million.

Early subscribers will have the opportunity to subscribe for FTX debt at a very low price, and will enjoy FTX debt and debt-related airdrop, priority right of information, priority right of compensation and other rights in the future.

2. Airdrop period. After FTX recovers the database or FTX officially confirms the actual debt of the creditor, DebtDAO will issue additional debt according to the actual amount of the debt and issue airdrop to all FUD holders.

For example: If the actual amount of the debt is confirmed to be USD 60 million through FTX database or published debt information, 40 million FUDs will be issued on the basis of the initial 20 million FUDs, and according to the rules of DebtDAO, the user who holds 1 FUD issued in the initial issue will receive 2 additional FUDs by air drop.

3. Payment period. This debt has the highest priority rating of all FTX debts because FTX has far higher collateral than the debt and the collateral cannot be disposed of without the creditor's consent. During the repayment transaction, DebtDAO will help all users holding FUD carry out 1:1 debt repurchases.

·

Advantages of holding and trading FUDs

For creditors, it is understandable that if they do not want to wait for FTX to repay the debt, they can obtain working capital in advance through FUD for other purposes. Similar to collateralized debt obligations, decentralized agreements will be more convenient than traditional finance.

For investors investing in FUD, if FTX's original creditors have urgent capital needs, it is inevitable to sell at a discount. Investors in FUD can obtain FTX debt at a lower price. In addition, FUDs can be traded freely, and there is no liquidity problem; Fair value can also be reflected in price in a timely manner, without affecting short-term investment decisions.

In addition, the risk of debt assets is much lower than that of equity assets. The token value of FUD is backed by FTX debt, which will not return to zero at worst. At FTX's bankruptcy hearing, lawyers said that $5bn of assets had been recovered, suggesting that the chances of the debt being repaid were high and that it was only a matter of time before it entered the US legal process.

·

Information for FUD investors to note

1. The size of FTX's debt. Decide later can obtain several times the airdrop.

2. Repayment time of FTX. Determine the time value of assets and determine the cycle of FUD price return to value.

3. Other possibilities of FTX debt, i.e. other powers other than debt servicing, such as debt-equity swaps.

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit5h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片