Bitcoin sees most long liquidations of 2023 as BTC price tags $22.5K

CointelegraphPublished on 2023-01-31Last updated on 2023-01-31

Abstract

BTC price downside volatility sees $46 million of long Bitcoin positions evaporate in a single day before the monthly close.

Bitcoin (BTC) swapped bullish gains for chop into Jan. 31 as the end of the month saw nervous price action.

BTC/USD 1-hour candle chart (Bitstamp). Source: TradingView

""

$46 million of longs liquidated


Data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView tracked a less confident BTC/USD as it briefly wicked to just above $22,500 on Bitstamp overnight.


A rebound saw the pair flip $23,000 to short-term resistance, and was still trading below that level at the time of writing.


The stakes remained high for traders both long and short with the monthly close just hours away. This was to be followed by interest rate decisions from the United States Federal Reserve on Feb. 1, along with the European Central Bank (ECB) a day later.


With volatility likely lying in wait, liquidations mounted despite Bitcoin maintaining a fairly narrow trading range.


The trip to $22,500 sparked $46 million of long liquidations on Jan. 30, which according to data from Coinglass was the highest daily total of 2023 so far.

Bitcoin liquidations chart. Source: Coinglass

""

Further data from on-chain analytics resource Material Indicators meanwhile highlighted the tense situation on the Binance order book.


Bid and ask liquidity remained in flux, with incremental shifts up and down having a tangible impact on BTC price trajectory. Bids just below $22,000 and asks at $24,000 kept BTC/USD in check.

BTC/USD order book data (Binance). Source: Material Indicators/ Twitter

""

“It's worth noting that this is the same block of bids that has been pushing BTC price for weeks and because it's prone to move, could end up getting rugged,” Material Indicators commented in a Twitter thread on Jan. 30.


Continuing, analysis said that the location of the liquidity was “no coincidence,” singling out Bitcoin’s old all-time high from 2017 as a “last stand” support zone should current levels fail to hold.

BTC/USD annotated chart. Source: Material Indicators/ Twitter

""

Crypto traders stem "dry powder" inflows


Catalysts for a Bitcoin and altcoin comedown had already been mounting at the week's Wall Street open.

U.S. equities lost ground on Jan. 30, with market-wide nerves over the Fed showing themselves in decreased risk appetite.


This was also conspicuous on crypto exchanges as stablecoin deposits cooled, reducing what one analyst called "dry powder" available for deployment into cryptoassets.


"Right now there is a negative correlation between price & stablecoin deposits. Of course this is not the only one indicator which we need to check but Fed meeting will be held within this week and we also see this negative correlation," Kripto Mevsimi, a contributor to on-chain analytics platform CryptoQuant, summarized in a blog post.


"We can expect high volatility within this week however we need to be careful since there is not much dry powder coming into exchanges anymore."


An accompanying chart showed a divergence in stablecoin deposits relative to BTC/USD growth in the second half of January.

BTC/USD vs. stablecoin deposits chart (screenshot). Source: CryptoQuant

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit3h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit3h ago

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit has referred around 40 unregistered virtual asset service providers to the police as part of a regulatory crackdown. Under local law, all crypto exchanges must obtain ISMS certification and FIU registration before operating, yet only 28 entities are currently registered. The FIU identified methods used by offshore platforms to attract Korean users, including advertising on local messaging apps and using private money changers to convert stablecoins. Officials stressed that unregistered platforms are not protected by Korean law. This action aligns with South Korea's push for stricter global crypto compliance through FATF measures. FIU Director Lee Hyung-joo recently urged FATF members to remove transaction thresholds for the "Travel Rule," as South Korea plans to mandate identity checks for all crypto transactions starting in August, expanding from the current 1 million won (≈$730) minimum. Regulatory enforcement has intensified in 2026, with authorities pursuing criminal cases against market manipulation schemes and enhancing cooperation with financial institutions to curb cross-border illegal transactions.

TheNewsCrypto3h ago

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

TheNewsCrypto3h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手4h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片