7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

On April 16, Yi Lihua, founder of Liquid Capital (formerly LD Capital), acknowledged that he is quite ordinary yet important. Whether in traditional industries or entering the cryptocurrency space, we have always focused on primary investment and secondary trading. Although operating projects and trading platforms can be very profitable, our energy and capabilities are indeed limited, leaving us only to admire and envy others. In 2018, we incubated a market-making firm, but the team kept the profits for themselves and left the losses to us, which led to a painful exit in 2019. Since then, I have not been deeply involved in market making; at most, I have invested in some promising trading teams. Conspiracy theories are always popular, but I am not a jack-of-all-trades; I simply do not have the ability or energy to manage projects, and trading platforms are very aware of this.

[Yi Lihua: Focused on Primary Investment and Secondary Trading, No Longer Deeply Involved in Market Making Since 2019]On April 16, Yi Lihua, founder of Liquid Capital (formerly LD Capital), acknowledged that he is quite ordinary yet important. Whether in traditional industries or entering the cryptocurrency space, we have always focused on primary investment and secondary trading. Although operating projects and trading platforms can be very profitable, our energy and capabilities are indeed limited, leaving us only to admire and envy others. In 2018, we incubated a market-making firm, but the team kept the profits for themselves and left the losses to us, which led to a painful exit in 2019. Since then, I have not been deeply involved in market making; at most, I have invested in some promising trading teams. Conspiracy theories are always popular, but I am not a jack-of-all-trades; I simply do not have the ability or energy to manage projects, and trading platforms are very aware of this.

Yi Lihua: Focused on Primary Investment and Secondary Trading, No Longer Deeply Involved in Market Making Since 2019

On April 16, on-chain analyst Murphy indicated that the cost for short-term holders (1-3m_RP) holding for 1-3 months is approximately $75,400, which is near the current price. In this downtrend, BTC has rebounded close to this resistance level for the second time. The last rebound near this position occurred between January 13 and January 19, where a slight breakthrough led to selling pressure and continued pullback. Based on historical data, the analyst believes that the likelihood of another pullback is high, as in the past three cycles, there has never been a successful reversal on just the second challenge of a resistance level. Additionally, there is a potential scenario where BTC could break through but encounter greater resistance above, specifically at the average cost line for short-term holders (STH-RP). Currently, around 2.31 million BTC are located at approximately $81,000, and if BTC faces resistance here after an upward movement, the market will need time to digest the selling pressure and begin to cautiously choose a direction.

[Analysis: BTC Faces Second Challenge at $75,400 Short-Term Holder Cost, High Likelihood of Further Pullback]On April 16, on-chain analyst Murphy indicated that the cost for short-term holders (1-3m_RP) holding for 1-3 months is approximately $75,400, which is near the current price. In this downtrend, BTC has rebounded close to this resistance level for the second time. The last rebound near this position occurred between January 13 and January 19, where a slight breakthrough led to selling pressure and continued pullback. Based on historical data, the analyst believes that the likelihood of another pullback is high, as in the past three cycles, there has never been a successful reversal on just the second challenge of a resistance level. Additionally, there is a potential scenario where BTC could break through but encounter greater resistance above, specifically at the average cost line for short-term holders (STH-RP). Currently, around 2.31 million BTC are located at approximately $81,000, and if BTC faces resistance here after an upward movement, the market will need time to digest the selling pressure and begin to cautiously choose a direction.

Analysis: BTC Faces Second Challenge at $75,400 Short-Term Holder Cost, High Likelihood of Further Pullback

On April 16, it was reported that Exchange Traded Concepts, an asset management giant with a management scale of $21.7 billion, has increased its holdings in MicroStrategy ($MSTR) by 19,897 shares, bringing its total holdings to 262,066 shares, valued at approximately $37.5 million.

[Asset Management Giant Exchange Traded Concepts Increases MSTR Holdings to 262,066 Shares Worth Approximately $37.5 Million]On April 16, it was reported that Exchange Traded Concepts, an asset management giant with a management scale of $21.7 billion, has increased its holdings in MicroStrategy ($MSTR) by 19,897 shares, bringing its total holdings to 262,066 shares, valued at approximately $37.5 million.

Asset Management Giant Exchange Traded Concepts Increases MSTR Holdings to 262,066 Shares Worth Approximately $37.5 Million

On April 16, market news: Anthropic plans to provide access to 'Mythos' for UK banks within the next week.

[Anthropic Plans to Provide Access to 'Mythos' for UK Banks Next Week]On April 16, market news: Anthropic plans to provide access to 'Mythos' for UK banks within the next week.

Anthropic Plans to Provide Access to 'Mythos' for UK Banks Next Week

On April 16, JPMorgan analysts stated that negotiations on the U.S. Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (the CLARITY Act) have entered the final stage, with both sides working to reach compromises on a few remaining contentious points. The number of disputes has been reduced from over a dozen to 2-3 core issues, with discussions on stablecoin rewards being "in a good place." While banks express concerns about stablecoins offering similar yields to deposits, there is an overall bipartisan compromise trend. JPMorgan believes that "there is no perfect bill"; once passed, the act will provide important regulatory clarity for the integration of digital assets into the U.S. financial system. The remaining major disagreements focus on stablecoin rewards, DeFi regulation, and token classification. Although optimism is rising, there is still a risk of delays due to the 2026 midterm elections, which could lead to a more uncertain political environment. If the act is ultimately passed, it will delineate the regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC, bringing a long-term regulatory framework for stablecoins, DeFi, and the entire cryptocurrency industry.

[JPMorgan: Negotiations on the CLARITY Act Enter Final Stage, Disputes Reduced to 2-3 Core Issues]On April 16, JPMorgan analysts stated that negotiations on the U.S. Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (the CLARITY Act) have entered the final stage, with both sides working to reach compromises on a few remaining contentious points. The number of disputes has been reduced from over a dozen to 2-3 core issues, with discussions on stablecoin rewards being "in a good place." While banks express concerns about stablecoins offering similar yields to deposits, there is an overall bipartisan compromise trend. JPMorgan believes that "there is no perfect bill"; once passed, the act will provide important regulatory clarity for the integration of digital assets into the U.S. financial system. The remaining major disagreements focus on stablecoin rewards, DeFi regulation, and token classification. Although optimism is rising, there is still a risk of delays due to the 2026 midterm elections, which could lead to a more uncertain political environment. If the act is ultimately passed, it will delineate the regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC, bringing a long-term regulatory framework for stablecoins, DeFi, and the entire cryptocurrency industry.

JPMorgan: Negotiations on the CLARITY Act Enter Final Stage, Disputes Reduced to 2-3 Core Issues

On April 16, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Baghaei emphasized in an interview with Russian media that the United States and Israel must be held accountable for the assassination of Iranian officials. He pointed out that not only Iran but the entire international community should demand accountability from the two countries, as their actions constitute a "crime against international peace and security." Baghaei stressed that this act is both a war crime and a crime against humanity. (CCTV International News)

[Iran to Hold US and Israel Responsible for Officials' Assassinations]On April 16, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Baghaei emphasized in an interview with Russian media that the United States and Israel must be held accountable for the assassination of Iranian officials. He pointed out that not only Iran but the entire international community should demand accountability from the two countries, as their actions constitute a "crime against international peace and security." Baghaei stressed that this act is both a war crime and a crime against humanity. (CCTV International News)

Iran to Hold US and Israel Responsible for Officials' Assassinations

On April 16, it was reported that the National Cyberspace Administration continues to rectify the chaos surrounding online financial information. (Xinhua News Agency)

[National Cyberspace Administration Continues to Address Online Financial Information Chaos]On April 16, it was reported that the National Cyberspace Administration continues to rectify the chaos surrounding online financial information. (Xinhua News Agency)

National Cyberspace Administration Continues to Address Online Financial Information Chaos

On April 16, a senior Iranian official stated that hopes for an extended U.S.-Iran ceasefire and a second round of negotiations have increased following a visit by Pakistani military officials. However, fundamental disagreements still exist regarding nuclear issues. The fate of Iran's high-purity uranium and the duration of its nuclear restrictions remain unresolved. (Jin Shi)

[Iranian Official: Hopes for Extended Ceasefire and Second Round of Talks Increase, but Nuclear Discrepancies Remain]On April 16, a senior Iranian official stated that hopes for an extended U.S.-Iran ceasefire and a second round of negotiations have increased following a visit by Pakistani military officials. However, fundamental disagreements still exist regarding nuclear issues. The fate of Iran's high-purity uranium and the duration of its nuclear restrictions remain unresolved. (Jin Shi)

Iranian Official: Hopes for Extended Ceasefire and Second Round of Talks Increase, but Nuclear Discrepancies Remain

On April 16, JPMorgan analysts stated that negotiations on the U.S. Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (the CLARITY Act) have entered the final stage, with both parties working to reach a compromise on a few remaining contentious points. The number of disputes has been reduced from over a dozen to 2-3 core issues, with discussions on stablecoin rewards being in a 'good state.' While banks express concerns about offering similar yields to deposits for stablecoins, there is an overall bipartisan compromise trend. JPMorgan believes that 'there is no perfect bill,' but once passed, the act will provide important regulatory clarity for the integration of digital assets into the U.S. financial system. The Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act is currently in advanced negotiations in the U.S. Senate, with Senate staff stating that the draft is 'very close' to resolution, although the final text has not yet been released, and no formal vote has been scheduled. The remaining major disagreements focus on stablecoin rewards, DeFi regulation, and token classification. Despite rising optimism, there is still a risk of delays due to the 2026 midterm elections, which could lead to a more uncertain political environment. If ultimately passed, the act will delineate the regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC, providing a long-term regulatory framework for stablecoins, DeFi, and the entire cryptocurrency industry.

[JPMorgan: Negotiations on the CLARITY Act Enter Final Stage, Disputes Reduced to 2-3 Core Issues]On April 16, JPMorgan analysts stated that negotiations on the U.S. Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (the CLARITY Act) have entered the final stage, with both parties working to reach a compromise on a few remaining contentious points. The number of disputes has been reduced from over a dozen to 2-3 core issues, with discussions on stablecoin rewards being in a 'good state.' While banks express concerns about offering similar yields to deposits for stablecoins, there is an overall bipartisan compromise trend. JPMorgan believes that 'there is no perfect bill,' but once passed, the act will provide important regulatory clarity for the integration of digital assets into the U.S. financial system. The Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act is currently in advanced negotiations in the U.S. Senate, with Senate staff stating that the draft is 'very close' to resolution, although the final text has not yet been released, and no formal vote has been scheduled. The remaining major disagreements focus on stablecoin rewards, DeFi regulation, and token classification. Despite rising optimism, there is still a risk of delays due to the 2026 midterm elections, which could lead to a more uncertain political environment. If ultimately passed, the act will delineate the regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC, providing a long-term regulatory framework for stablecoins, DeFi, and the entire cryptocurrency industry.

June 21 (Huobi) - Web 3.0 aims to establish decentralized and resilient governance through community-driven ecosystems, but token-based governance models can lead to centralization and manipulation. Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are currently the dominant organizational model in Web 3.0, but they are also susceptible to centralization risks through token ownership.

[Reputation-based governance: A solution for fair and meritocratic Web 3.0 ecosystems]June 21 (Huobi) - Web 3.0 aims to establish decentralized and resilient governance through community-driven ecosystems, but token-based governance models can lead to centralization and manipulation. Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are currently the dominant organizational model in Web 3.0, but they are also susceptible to centralization risks through token ownership.

Reputation-based governance: A solution for fair and meritocratic Web 3.0 ecosystems

Article

edge soared to 1.0899 USDT, a new high with a 24-hour increase of -0.10%. It currently trades at 1.027 USDT on HTX.

cfg soared to 0.2115 USDT, a new high with a 24-hour increase of -4.34%. It currently trades at 0.2005 USDT on HTX.

Israel Warns of Possible Renewed Conflict with Iran, Continues Strikes on Hezbollah

SpaceX Plans Site Visits for Potential Major Investors Ahead of Large IPO

US Dollar Index Declines 0.07% on April 15

Iranian Speaker Ghalibaf: Lebanon's Ceasefire is a Result of Resistance Front's Struggle

Bitunix Analyst: Energy Supply Risks Shift to Manageable but Not Resolved, Delayed Responses in Policy and Corporate Behavior, Market Enters Asymmetric Pricing Phase

Reputation-based governance: A solution for fair and meritocratic Web 3.0 ecosystems

Disclaimer：The content above does not represent HTX's positions.，HTX does not provide any trading recommendations.。

All Comments0LatestHot

Trending Topics