7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

According to monitoring by Beating, someone shared a screenshot from OpenClaw's latest documentation stating that 'Anthropic allows the use of Claude CLI in OpenClaw style' on Hacker News, which quickly gained traction and was also circulated on X. OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger responded on both platforms, providing the clearest version of the situation: verbal permission is true, but the actual blocking is also true. According to Steinberger, Boris Cherny, the head of Claude Code, previously stated on X that CLI usage was permitted, prompting OpenClaw to re-enable support and default to disabling high token consumption features like heartbeat. However, the team found that the Anthropic server still blocks OpenClaw's system prompt snippets, resulting in calls being denied. He added that a few renaming tweaks could bypass the classifier, but he does not want to engage in such a cat-and-mouse game. OpenClaw's integration with Claude Code fundamentally involves calling `claude -p`, which is a one-time non-interactive mode of the official Claude CLI, without an independent bypass; whether it uses an API key or Pro/Max/Team subscription depends on which account the local Claude CLI is logged into at the time. Anthropic's current 'blocking of OpenClaw' does not prohibit the `claude -p` command itself, but rather identifies OpenClaw through system prompt fingerprinting on the server side, leading to rejections upon detection. Boris's verbal 'CLI allowed' and the documentation's 'reuse of `claude -p` is tacitly permitted' refer to the same issue, with the only difference being whether the classifier allows OpenClaw based on subscription limits. OpenClaw removed Claude CLI from the default onboarding for new users in version 2026.4.5, but added it back two days later in version 2026.4.7, while also implementing a series of variable cleanups and permission restrictions for the Claude CLI runtime environment. The 're-allowed' status in this round of documentation corresponds to the changes made in version 2026.4.7.

[OpenClaw Founder Responds to Claude CLI 'Unblocking' Rumors: Verbally Allowed but Still Blocked in Practice]According to monitoring by Beating, someone shared a screenshot from OpenClaw's latest documentation stating that 'Anthropic allows the use of Claude CLI in OpenClaw style' on Hacker News, which quickly gained traction and was also circulated on X. OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger responded on both platforms, providing the clearest version of the situation: verbal permission is true, but the actual blocking is also true. According to Steinberger, Boris Cherny, the head of Claude Code, previously stated on X that CLI usage was permitted, prompting OpenClaw to re-enable support and default to disabling high token consumption features like heartbeat. However, the team found that the Anthropic server still blocks OpenClaw's system prompt snippets, resulting in calls being denied. He added that a few renaming tweaks could bypass the classifier, but he does not want to engage in such a cat-and-mouse game. OpenClaw's integration with Claude Code fundamentally involves calling `claude -p`, which is a one-time non-interactive mode of the official Claude CLI, without an independent bypass; whether it uses an API key or Pro/Max/Team subscription depends on which account the local Claude CLI is logged into at the time. Anthropic's current 'blocking of OpenClaw' does not prohibit the `claude -p` command itself, but rather identifies OpenClaw through system prompt fingerprinting on the server side, leading to rejections upon detection. Boris's verbal 'CLI allowed' and the documentation's 'reuse of `claude -p` is tacitly permitted' refer to the same issue, with the only difference being whether the classifier allows OpenClaw based on subscription limits. OpenClaw removed Claude CLI from the default onboarding for new users in version 2026.4.5, but added it back two days later in version 2026.4.7, while also implementing a series of variable cleanups and permission restrictions for the Claude CLI runtime environment. The 're-allowed' status in this round of documentation corresponds to the changes made in version 2026.4.7.

OpenClaw Founder Responds to Claude CLI 'Unblocking' Rumors: Verbally Allowed but Still Blocked in Practice

On April 22, renowned trader Killa (@KillaXBT) announced that he has raised the stop-loss price for his Bitcoin short position to $83,000. In mid-April, Killa stated that he had shorted Bitcoin at $74,688, with a stop-loss set at $80,000, which would become invalid if the weekly close exceeds that price. Killa, a quantitative trader focusing on BTC, predicted the peak of the current bull market in May 2025 and has over 180,000 followers on platform X.

[Renowned Trader Raises Bitcoin Short Stop-Loss to $83,000]On April 22, renowned trader Killa (@KillaXBT) announced that he has raised the stop-loss price for his Bitcoin short position to $83,000. In mid-April, Killa stated that he had shorted Bitcoin at $74,688, with a stop-loss set at $80,000, which would become invalid if the weekly close exceeds that price. Killa, a quantitative trader focusing on BTC, predicted the peak of the current bull market in May 2025 and has over 180,000 followers on platform X.

Renowned Trader Raises Bitcoin Short Stop-Loss to $83,000

On April 22, MoonPay, the Dogecoin Foundation, and House of Doge donated 1 million $DOGE to the AKC Humane Fund to support dog welfare initiatives across the United States.

[MoonPay, Dogecoin Foundation, and House of Doge Donate 1 Million DOGE to AKC Humane Fund]On April 22, MoonPay, the Dogecoin Foundation, and House of Doge donated 1 million $DOGE to the AKC Humane Fund to support dog welfare initiatives across the United States.

MoonPay, Dogecoin Foundation, and House of Doge Donate 1 Million DOGE to AKC Humane Fund

On April 22, the privacy crypto protocol Umbra shut down its frontend website to increase the difficulty for hackers to transfer stolen funds. Umbra stated that approximately $800,000 in stolen funds had flowed through its protocol, and the frontend shutdown was a 'maintenance mode' decision that would be reversed once it ensured that recovery efforts were not affected. This move comes after the Kelp protocol was recently attacked, resulting in losses exceeding $280 million, with the attackers suspected to be North Korean hackers attempting to transfer funds from Ethereum to Bitcoin through protocols like Umbra. However, Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm warned that merely shutting down the frontend may not be enough to avoid regulatory accountability. He pointed out that in their case, authorities considered 'changing the frontend equivalent to controlling the entire protocol,' and 'if you can change the user interface, including updates via a new version on IPFS, then you have complete control over the protocol.' Umbra responded by stating that its protocol is primarily used to 'protect the identity of recipients, not senders,' and that all stolen funds flowing through its protocol can be traced, and they have contacted security researchers.

[Privacy Protocol Umbra Shuts Down Frontend to Thwart Kelp Attackers; Tornado Cash Co-Founder Says Move Insufficient to Avoid Regulatory Accountability]On April 22, the privacy crypto protocol Umbra shut down its frontend website to increase the difficulty for hackers to transfer stolen funds. Umbra stated that approximately $800,000 in stolen funds had flowed through its protocol, and the frontend shutdown was a 'maintenance mode' decision that would be reversed once it ensured that recovery efforts were not affected. This move comes after the Kelp protocol was recently attacked, resulting in losses exceeding $280 million, with the attackers suspected to be North Korean hackers attempting to transfer funds from Ethereum to Bitcoin through protocols like Umbra. However, Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm warned that merely shutting down the frontend may not be enough to avoid regulatory accountability. He pointed out that in their case, authorities considered 'changing the frontend equivalent to controlling the entire protocol,' and 'if you can change the user interface, including updates via a new version on IPFS, then you have complete control over the protocol.' Umbra responded by stating that its protocol is primarily used to 'protect the identity of recipients, not senders,' and that all stolen funds flowing through its protocol can be traced, and they have contacted security researchers.

Privacy Protocol Umbra Shuts Down Frontend to Thwart Kelp Attackers; Tornado Cash Co-Founder Says Move Insufficient to Avoid Regulatory Accountability

On April 22, the Nikkei 225 index closed up 236.69 points, a gain of 0.40%, reaching 59,585.86 points, marking a historic high. The South Korean KOSPI index closed up 29.43 points, a gain of 0.46%, reaching 6,417.9 points, also a historic high. (Jin Shi)

[Japanese and South Korean Stock Markets Rise to Historic Highs]On April 22, the Nikkei 225 index closed up 236.69 points, a gain of 0.40%, reaching 59,585.86 points, marking a historic high. The South Korean KOSPI index closed up 29.43 points, a gain of 0.46%, reaching 6,417.9 points, also a historic high. (Jin Shi)

Japanese and South Korean Stock Markets Rise to Historic Highs

On April 22, the privacy cryptocurrency protocol Umbra announced it has shut down its frontend website to increase the difficulty for hackers to transfer stolen funds. Umbra stated that approximately $800,000 in stolen funds have flowed through its protocol, and the frontend shutdown is a "maintenance mode" decision that will be reversed once it ensures that recovery efforts are not affected. This move comes in the wake of the Kelp protocol being attacked recently, resulting in losses exceeding $280 million, with the attackers suspected to be North Korean hackers attempting to transfer funds from Ethereum to Bitcoin through protocols like Umbra. However, Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm warned that merely shutting down the frontend may not be sufficient to avoid regulatory accountability. He pointed out that in their case, authorities considered that "changing the frontend is equivalent to controlling the entire protocol," and that "if you can change the user interface, including updates through a new version on IPFS, then you have complete control over the protocol." In response, Umbra stated that its protocol is primarily designed to "protect the identity of the receiver, not the sender," and that all stolen funds flowing through its protocol can be traced, with contact established with security researchers.

[Umbra Privacy Protocol Shuts Down Frontend to Thwart Kelp Attackers; Tornado Cash Co-Founder Warns It May Not Prevent Regulatory Accountability]On April 22, the privacy cryptocurrency protocol Umbra announced it has shut down its frontend website to increase the difficulty for hackers to transfer stolen funds. Umbra stated that approximately $800,000 in stolen funds have flowed through its protocol, and the frontend shutdown is a "maintenance mode" decision that will be reversed once it ensures that recovery efforts are not affected. This move comes in the wake of the Kelp protocol being attacked recently, resulting in losses exceeding $280 million, with the attackers suspected to be North Korean hackers attempting to transfer funds from Ethereum to Bitcoin through protocols like Umbra. However, Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm warned that merely shutting down the frontend may not be sufficient to avoid regulatory accountability. He pointed out that in their case, authorities considered that "changing the frontend is equivalent to controlling the entire protocol," and that "if you can change the user interface, including updates through a new version on IPFS, then you have complete control over the protocol." In response, Umbra stated that its protocol is primarily designed to "protect the identity of the receiver, not the sender," and that all stolen funds flowing through its protocol can be traced, with contact established with security researchers.

Umbra Privacy Protocol Shuts Down Frontend to Thwart Kelp Attackers; Tornado Cash Co-Founder Warns It May Not Prevent Regulatory Accountability

On April 22, according to HTX data, Ethereum has surged past $2,400, currently priced at $2,402, with a 24-hour increase of 3.9%.

[Ethereum Surges Past $2,400, Up 3.9% in 24 Hours]On April 22, according to HTX data, Ethereum has surged past $2,400, currently priced at $2,402, with a 24-hour increase of 3.9%.

Ethereum Surges Past $2,400, Up 3.9% in 24 Hours

On April 22, according to monitoring by Hyperinsight, after a market uptrend this morning, HYPE rebounded to fluctuate around $40, with a 24-hour decline of 3%. A newly opened whale position on Hyperliquid (0xec8) established a 5x leveraged short position on HYPE within the past hour, with an average price of $40.04 and a liquidation price of $46.6, holding a position size of approximately $3.38 million. Additionally, among the whales that opened positions today (with sizes over $1 million), the address closest to the liquidation line (0x4a8) opened a position at 1 PM today with an average price of $39.64, which has now turned from profit to loss. If HYPE rises to $41.6, this position will trigger liquidation. Address: 0xdf86c7c9069e9bd5bac9d97e21f9aa10f728fb86.

[HYPE Struggles at $40 Mark as Whales Open Short Positions with 5x Leverage]On April 22, according to monitoring by Hyperinsight, after a market uptrend this morning, HYPE rebounded to fluctuate around $40, with a 24-hour decline of 3%. A newly opened whale position on Hyperliquid (0xec8) established a 5x leveraged short position on HYPE within the past hour, with an average price of $40.04 and a liquidation price of $46.6, holding a position size of approximately $3.38 million. Additionally, among the whales that opened positions today (with sizes over $1 million), the address closest to the liquidation line (0x4a8) opened a position at 1 PM today with an average price of $39.64, which has now turned from profit to loss. If HYPE rises to $41.6, this position will trigger liquidation. Address: 0xdf86c7c9069e9bd5bac9d97e21f9aa10f728fb86.

HYPE Struggles at $40 Mark as Whales Open Short Positions with 5x Leverage

On April 22, Al Jazeera reported that Tohid Asadi, a professor at Tehran University, stated that regarding the ceasefire, Iran has received both positive and negative signals. Tehran has indicated that it will not negotiate under imposed conditions and terms. Comparing the initial 10-point and 15-point proposals from Iran and the US reveals a significant divergence in their positions. Iran's distrust of the US, along with military rhetoric accompanying the potential failure of negotiations, casts a shadow over the current atmosphere. This serves as a warning that another round of confrontation may be imminent. Tehran still plans to use the Strait of Hormuz as a pressure point and bargaining chip in negotiations, attempting to assert jurisdiction over vessels passing through this strategically significant waterway. Iran has stated that the foundation of its foreign policy actions—especially concerning Israel—is that 'either everyone is safe, or no one is safe.' (Dongxin News Agency)

[Mixed Signals from Iran on Ceasefire; US-Iran Proposals Diverge]On April 22, Al Jazeera reported that Tohid Asadi, a professor at Tehran University, stated that regarding the ceasefire, Iran has received both positive and negative signals. Tehran has indicated that it will not negotiate under imposed conditions and terms. Comparing the initial 10-point and 15-point proposals from Iran and the US reveals a significant divergence in their positions. Iran's distrust of the US, along with military rhetoric accompanying the potential failure of negotiations, casts a shadow over the current atmosphere. This serves as a warning that another round of confrontation may be imminent. Tehran still plans to use the Strait of Hormuz as a pressure point and bargaining chip in negotiations, attempting to assert jurisdiction over vessels passing through this strategically significant waterway. Iran has stated that the foundation of its foreign policy actions—especially concerning Israel—is that 'either everyone is safe, or no one is safe.' (Dongxin News Agency)

Mixed Signals from Iran on Ceasefire; US-Iran Proposals Diverge

On April 21, news emerged that, according to monitoring by PeckShield, the Kelp DAO attacker transferred 30,800 ETH to a special address starting with 0x00000, possibly indicating a destruction action.

[Kelp DAO Attacker Transfers 30,800 ETH to Special Address]On April 21, news emerged that, according to monitoring by PeckShield, the Kelp DAO attacker transferred 30,800 ETH to a special address starting with 0x00000, possibly indicating a destruction action.

Kelp DAO Attacker Transfers 30,800 ETH to Special Address

Bitcoin Created By The CIA? Chinese Professor Jiang Xueqin Makes Bold Claim

BIT Research: Five Signals Flash Simultaneously, Has the Bitcoin Bear Market Ended?

Bitcoin Recovery Fails To Lift Market Sentiment From Extreme Fear

Nic Carter Says Bitcoin Has 3 Ways To Handle Satoshi’s Coins

Crypto And Financial Industry Giants Reveal What X Money Launch Means

Crypto Regulation: Polish Parliament Fails To Overturn Presidential Veto Again

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

BTC Market Pulse: Week 17

Shiba Inu Crosses 20,000 Burn Transactions Milestone, Dogecoin Eyes X Money, But Why Are Prices Down?

Strategy Surpasses 800K BTC as $2.5B Bitcoin Buying Spree Continues

Article

ZachXBT: KelpDAO Attacker Begins Laundering Stolen Funds into Bitcoin via Thorchain

Kelp DAO Attacker Transfers 30,800 ETH to Special Address

Disclaimer：The content above does not represent HTX's positions.，HTX does not provide any trading recommendations.。

Related Articles

All Comments0LatestHot

Trending Topics

Related Articles