Waves Price(WAVES)

Amid a broader crypto market downturn, Humanity Protocol (H) has surged over 17%, trading around $0.1699 with a market cap of $366.24 million. Daily trading volume spiked 122% to $273.68 million, though $4.46 million in liquidations occurred. Technical indicators suggest bullish momentum: MACD shows strength, CMF indicates buying pressure, and RSI at 60.44 reflects positive sentiment without overbought conditions. If bullish pressure continues, H could test resistance at $0.1739 or even $0.1865. However, a reversal might push prices down to $0.1524 or lower support zones near $0.14–$0.13.

Ethereum staking is experiencing significant weekly withdrawal spikes from major entities like Lido, Binance, and Frax Finance, with peaks reaching 800,000 to 1.5 million ETH. However, these withdrawals represent operational rotations—such as validator rebalancing and client migrations—rather than a loss of confidence. The total staked ETH continues to grow steadily, surpassing 33 million, supported by new validators and the rise of restaking services like ether.fi and Renzo. This shift indicates a move toward multi-layer yield structures and restaking ecosystems, underscoring sustained long-term growth and a structurally bullish trend for Ethereum’s staking economy.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) surged 22.22% in 24 hours, reaching around $27.05 amid a broader crypto market uptick. It broke through key resistance levels between $22.13 and $27.11, with trading volume spiking over 98%. Technical indicators like MACD and Chaikin Money Flow suggest bullish momentum and buying pressure. However, the RSI at 77.19 indicates overbought conditions, raising the possibility of a short-term pullback. If bullish pressure continues, HYPE could challenge the $27.20 resistance, while a reversal might see it fall toward support below $26.90.

Amid a broader crypto market correction, Humanity Protocol (H) has defied the trend with a significant 10.77% surge in the last 24 hours. The altcoin broke through key resistance levels, climbing from a low of $0.1272 to a high of $0.147, and is currently trading at $0.1417. Daily trading volume also increased by over 45% to $39.57 million. Technical indicators suggest growing bullish momentum. The MACD shows a strong bullish trend, while the RSI at 59.03 indicates healthy buying pressure without being overbought. The Chaikin Money Flow points to mild accumulation, and Bull Bear Power confirms slight bullish dominance. If the uptrend continues, the price could target $0.1437 and potentially break above $0.1457, possibly forming a golden cross. However, a reversal could see a retracement to $0.1397 or lower supports near $0.1351, potentially triggering a death cross.

The article discusses how Solana's grand vision of becoming an "Internet Capital Markets" platform is facing significant challenges in 2026, primarily from the unexpected rise of Hyperliquid. Solana's performance has weakened, with its token SOL experiencing the largest price decline among major cryptocurrencies. Its core narrative of building a global, chain-based marketplace for all assets is under pressure both internally and externally. Hyperliquid, originally a perpetual futures exchange, has evolved into a dedicated Layer 1 financial infrastructure network. Its focused, trading-centric approach is attracting capital and challenging the assumption that a "general-purpose" ecosystem like Solana is necessary for a capital market. Hyperliquid's success suggests that for high-frequency trading, superior performance, liquidity, and user experience may be more critical than a broad application ecosystem. Internally, Solana's strategy suffered a blow from a major hack on the Drift Protocol in April, resulting in over $200 million in losses. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko has heavily promoted Phoenix as a new decentralized perpetual futures platform on Solana. While this boosted Phoenix's visibility, its trading volume remains far behind leading platforms. Solana's community has launched a rhetorical attack against Hyperliquid, questioning its decentralization due to its limited validator set and closed-source code. Critics, however, point out Solana's own decreasing validator count and increasing centralization of stake. This focus on "decentralization metrics" has also caused internal friction, with other Solana ecosystem developers expressing discontent over the foundation's perceived favoritism towards Phoenix. The article concludes that the rise of Hyperliquid represents a challenge to the "general-purpose blockchain" narrative, proving that an efficient trading engine might be more central to a capital market than a vast ecosystem. If Solana cannot regain dominance in the derivatives space, it risks remaining a "meme coin paradise" rather than achieving its ambition of hosting global assets.