Curve DAO Token Price(CRV)

Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov has proposed a 17.45 million CRV token grant (worth approximately $6.6 million) to Swiss Stake AG, the firm behind Curve, to support ecosystem growth, research, and development. The funds will be used for tech and security enhancements, sustaining the 25-member team, and advancing projects like the new lending system Llamalend, onchain foreign currency swaps, and UI improvements. The grant will also support open-source development, cross-chain functionalities, and governance infrastructure. While Swiss Stake AG has generated some revenue, it remains dependent on community funding. If approved, the firm must use the grant as specified and provide bi-annual spending reports.

Curve DAO (CRV) experienced a 6.6% increase in Open Interest, indicating heightened speculative activity, despite its price declining by 2.63% in 24 hours and 9.9% over the past week. Analysis of higher timeframes reveals a bearish trend, with the weekly chart showing a break below key support levels at $0.49 and $0.37. The A/D indicator and MACD both reflect strong selling pressure and downward momentum. On the 6-hour chart, a bearish structure break and a short-selling setup were identified, with an overhead imbalance zone up to $0.38. A move above $0.38 would invalidate the bearish outlook. The next major support target is $0.243, with intermediate supports at $0.329 and $0.298. Overall, market structure and indicators favor further downside.

A proposal to grant 17 million CRV tokens (worth approximately $1.7 million) to Swiss Stake AG, a long-time core development team, was rejected in a Curve Finance governance vote. Major veCRV holders, including Convex and Yearn, voted against it, wielding enough voting power to determine the outcome. The rejection reflects two key shifts in DAO governance: First, communities are demanding greater accountability, transparency, and measurable results for treasury grants, moving beyond unconditional funding. Second, large veCRV holders, motivated by self-interest, are resistant to proposals that dilute their token value without clear, foreseeable benefits to them. The incident highlights the evolving power dynamics within Curve's governance. The veToken model, which ties voting rights to long-term locked capital, inherently concentrates power among large, capital-rich entities like Convex and Yearn. As users delegate their tokens to these protocols for yield and liquidity, governance is increasingly shifting from founders and communities to a form of "governance capitalism" dominated by major stakeholders.

A significant governance proposal within the Curve DAO, requesting 17 million CRV in funding for development team Swiss Stake AG, was recently rejected. Major veCRV holders, including Convex and Yearn, voted against the proposal, effectively blocking its passage. The rejection reflects two key concerns within the community: a demand for greater transparency and accountability regarding the use of previous grants and future spending plans, and a reluctance from large token holders to dilute the value of their veCRV holdings without a clear, direct return on investment. The article highlights a shift in DeFi governance, moving away from a model of automatic funding approval. It contrasts the veToken model, used by Curve, with standard governance systems. The ve model binds voting power to long-term token lock-ups, attracting capital-heavy players focused on long-term gains. This, combined with the prevalence of vote-aggregating protocols like Convex, is centralizing decision-making power with large capital providers rather than the broader community or even project founders. The outcome of this vote suggests that future governance power in Curve may lie primarily with these major stakeholders.